|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi,iv been looking at the 02 SAAB 9-3 20T SE and the 01 SAAB 9-5 20T VECTOR,
they both have much the same spec,but does anyone know what the difference is with the two models, thanks Mark |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The main difference is the model....
![]() The '02 9-3 you are looking at is a hatchback with the B205 engine, in SE spec 185 hp and running Trionic 7 engine management. Nice car, very thin & high-looking compared to the later 9-3's, but its a hatchback - you can fit virtually anything in it ! Handy when you have two large dogs and dont want a estate... of a couple of MTB's or lots of RC kit ! I presume you are looking at the 3-door and not the 5 door ? Fuel economy is suprisingly good, parts are relatively cheap, its extremely quick and it dosent have too many inherent problems - the old sludging problem isnt so much of a concern these days as they will have been sorted out by now with a clean out and the latest oil breathing kit. The '01 9-5 is the larger model, booted with 4 doors - basically larger all round. A family car. I personally dont like it myself - i still prefer the old 9000 for the larger Saab - but if you do have a large family its great. It also runs the B205 engine in 2.0 litre form, basically the same so the same rules apply as for the 9-3's engine. But larger car, slightly slower. And a bit boring tbh ![]() Ive been a Saab fan for years for 9000's and early 900 Turbos, i had the same choice as you for a buisness car recently so i went for a '01 Saab 9-3 Viggen with the biggest engine they put in it - the B325 with 230 hp.... ![]() ![]() Also look at the 9-3 Aero HOT up to '02 - same bodykit as the Viggen but with the 2.0 T engine. Better interiors in my opinion, and also not expensive. And a bit quicker than the SE. Oh, and if possible get a 3-door if you decide on a 9-3, they command better re-sale values than the 4 door. Early 9-5's are now cheap as chips - if it goes wrong, bin it and buy another.... ![]() If you need more info go on UKSaabs. Bets place for friendly information and advice if you require it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Saab 95 is bigger than the 93. Like the diffence between a vectra and a omega. The 93 is hatchback and 95 is a saloon.
__________________
Robert Jaques, Schumacher Racing KC, K2. Team Associated SC5M "The Japanese Sniper" Team Autocare & Cycles |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
wow thanks Dyna,just the info i was after,out the two the 02 has the least milage,only 46,000
![]() Thanks rob,you understand how my brain works ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice car if u want a vauxhall.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() nothing wrong with vauxhall.......but i like the saab better ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
EFA.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Jolly Goodz. WBMCC. Team Autocare and Cycles. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Saab 9-3 is based on a vectra!!!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
dont worry wes,the boot is big enough for all our stuff,and you
![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does this mean you can drive now reg
![]() be careful with anything thats got a z19dth engine in it ![]() ![]()
__________________
Website: http://www.wbmcc.co.uk/bingham-model-raceway.html Schumacher Cat Xls, Rc10 Team(retired), Mardave Cobra, SST 98 Rally Car, TT02 Rally car, Wpl-c24 and Element Enduro builders kit #71 #deaddogracing Autocare, unit 5 candleby Court, Cotgrave NG123RT. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You will soon find out if you buy a car based on a Vectra
![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
thanks Dave,ill make sure i ask ![]() thanks Daz,very un helpfull as usual |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bloody hell Mark, how did I miss this thread!
Although both the 9-3 and 9-5 are based on a Vauxhall platform, Saab has done plenty with these to make them very un-Vauxhall-like. I've just acquired a 2002 9-5 Aero with 1 owner, 60K on clock for an unbelievable steal and it puts a smile on my face every time I jump into it! (250 BHP, 0-60 in 6.5 secs ![]() ![]() Out of the 9-3s, I definately prefer the 02 model to the later ones - in fastback they look more like proper Saabs. I do agree that the 2.0t 9-5 model is a bit underpowered for the car's size. If you can stretch to an Aero spec model I would as they SE spec is fitted with a Garrett turbocharger and the Aero is fitted with a Mitsubishi TD04 turbo (same on both the 9-3 and the 9-5, and the Scooby Impreza!!) - my understanding is that the Mitsubishi turbo is more reliable good for 150K, even though it is a high-pressure unit. There isn't much difference in the car's fuel economy so long as you don't go stupid with my right foot. I managed 40mpg on a return run to Luton airport. Even though the 9-5 has a higher milage, I wouldn't be put off with high-milage Saabs - they are generally driven by people who look after them and are good for 200k miles. If you want a blast in mne give me a shout ![]()
__________________
www.wbmcc.com |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Worth a look if you don't mind travelling:
http://www4.autotrader.co.uk/classif...ge/1?logcode=p If you go for a 9-5, try and get a post 2002 model since these were drastically improved (better handling, sharper front end etc
__________________
www.wbmcc.com |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Chris,thanks for the info,iv bought the 95 2.0t vector,after budget,insurance was the next thing,iv got no no claims so the sports model,at this point
![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Was it the one from Vee-Dub cars? if so it looks a nice motor! They aren't the cheapest cars to insure: my Aero is costing me £800 per year, and thats with 12 years NCB!
__________________
www.wbmcc.com |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
no its from a garage,12 months MOT,full saab service history and a month or 1000 miles warranty,i pay £700 with no NCB,and a claim in the last 5 years
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|