Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Schumacher

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 17-02-2008
bish's Avatar
bish bish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 189
Default

has there been any mention of 2 layshfts? that must be the only way to use 3 belts in that way (agree with terry.sc and sparrow.2) cruise only mentioned that 'one' of the shafts was up with the top deck, the forward one may be low down. love all this speculation! i would have thought it quite inefficient to run like that-suppose it won't matter with brushless anyway? would be nice to see it with some well made belts and alloy pulleys as standard!
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 17-02-2008
sparrow.2's Avatar
sparrow.2 sparrow.2 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Langenfeld/Germany
Posts: 1,383
Default

It has to have two layshafts in order to work the way cruise has explained it. If the motor is in the front it will end up transmitting power to the front layshaft I reckon.

This is going to make it tight for the steering, or it is going to push the layshaft and motor back too far to do anything nice with the batteries.

At least it doesn't sound like it's going to be a BJ4WE clone (not that I don't like the layout, it's just that it's nice to have different takes on a problem...)
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 17-02-2008
elvo's Avatar
elvo elvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruise View Post
The chassis is just 100mm wide and none of the belts is running between the cells.
Whoa. The S2 is 108mm, and that's anorexic.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 17-02-2008
Cruise's Avatar
Cruise Cruise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Augsburg/Germany
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elvo View Post
Whoa. The S2 is 108mm, and that's anorexic.
Well don`t nail me down on the exact size but its only two cells with the minimum material around.They didn`t let me measure it so it just calibrated eyes.

Cruise
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 18-02-2008
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Another clue .... oh the suspense!!!

Seriously though, I'm glad to see all the hype around this car building expectations .... will be great to see Schumy back at the sharp end.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 18-02-2008
U.S.CAT3K U.S.CAT3K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terry.sc View Post
Not JRXS, that's only two belts. I think three belts means a transmission layout like the Team Magic E4RS, or any 1/8th scale on road chassis if no belt goes between the batteries.
That makes sense. Batteries in the center, "centered" differentials, and the ability to easily change trans. gearing/overdrive.
__________________
Bring back the CAT!
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 18-02-2008
Cruise's Avatar
Cruise Cruise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Augsburg/Germany
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southwell View Post
Is it coming with a one way diff as standard?
There is a "center" one way integrated in the drivetrain.It`s got an on/ off option.

Cruise.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 18-02-2008
mattym0310's Avatar
mattym0310 mattym0310 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: York
Posts: 1,470
Send a message via MSN to mattym0310
Default

we want pictures! when do we get em cruise?
__________________
Matt Myers

Team Associated b4
Team Associated b44
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 18-02-2008
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

I'm bored now....
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 18-02-2008
Cruise's Avatar
Cruise Cruise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Augsburg/Germany
Posts: 261
Default

As I told you before : I don`t know when the official pictures will be available.
and you have already seen what I was allowed to take.


@ Sparrow2 : Woodpath

Cruise.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 19-02-2008
Cruise's Avatar
Cruise Cruise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Augsburg/Germany
Posts: 261
Default

You will be able to fit a stick type lipo without getting the weight balance out of shape.

Cruise
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 19-02-2008
_sleigh_ _sleigh_ is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In front of my PC
Posts: 1,920
Default

I reckon it looks like this....

and no, the drawing's not to scale and would need a little adjustment to fit the servo at the front, but its more to explain how the transmission 'could' look.

Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 19-02-2008
J_WOODY's Avatar
J_WOODY J_WOODY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _sleigh_ View Post
I reckon it looks like this....

and no, the drawing's not to scale and would need a little adjustment to fit the servo at the front, but its more to explain how the transmission 'could' look.

thats how i had it pictured in my mind !
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 19-02-2008
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

Bored Phil?

I think it's still using B4 wishbones or something, that's why we can't see it....

G
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 19-02-2008
_sleigh_ _sleigh_ is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In front of my PC
Posts: 1,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_WOODY View Post
thats how i had it pictured in my mind !
So that's what you're doing with all your time at home while being a mum.... designing the new CAT
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 19-02-2008
_sleigh_ _sleigh_ is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In front of my PC
Posts: 1,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northy View Post
Bored Phil?

I think it's still using B4 wishbones or something, that's why we can't see it....

G
More like they're made of something weak and snap easy, oh perhaps they're Losi XX4 arms.

Bored?? no, just an excuse to test the new network scanner that's appeared in the office.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 19-02-2008
RCbob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree with phil i was thinking along those lines, but why have a 4+2 cell combo if the cells go down the centre

also what do they hope to achieve with that transmission setup? is it really going to be that much better as it looks a bit over engineered to me.

Interesting though especially now everyone knows shaft is best
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 19-02-2008
Richard Lowe Richard Lowe is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,398
Default

It might be 4 cells inline then 2 cells at 90 degrees, I don't see why they would do that though as it is basically a stick pack
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 19-02-2008
_sleigh_ _sleigh_ is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In front of my PC
Posts: 1,920
Default

Perhaps it's a 4/2 hump pack (old skool)
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 19-02-2008
James's Avatar
James James is offline
RHR RACING
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Worksop/Blyth Tracks Nottinghamshire
Posts: 2,457
Send a message via MSN to James
Default

.......................................
__________________
~JAMES HELLIWELL~ROBIN HOOD RACEWAY~RHR DIRT~WORKSOP RACEWAY~BIRDS EYE VIEW~
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com