Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Team Associated

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-11-2007
HKP's Avatar
HKP HKP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South East Region
Posts: 460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anoolite76 View Post
I've been running a B3 and it's becoming more and more difficult to find parts. I wouldn't buy one because of that reason only. The car is perfectly fine, otherwise.
Buy a Thunder Tiger AT 10 for spares maybe? It's a clone of the B3 made in china. You can buy them new RTR for peanuts on eBay.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-11-2007
purpletimbo's Avatar
purpletimbo purpletimbo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 299
Send a message via MSN to purpletimbo
Default AT-10 Phoenix

i've got a NIB one and it came RTR even down to a decent nimh and charger in the box.


you can buy a fair amount of alloy hopups etc for the phoenix which will keep your B3 going a while
lower arms and a few bits here
http://www.anticsonline.co.uk/x898_1.html
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-11-2007
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Interesting!!!!

I always MUCH prefered my B3 to the B4 .... again just a matter of it suiting my style better I guess. Might look into getting a stock of bits and pulling the old girl out of retirement!!!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-11-2007
Nick Goodall's Avatar
Nick Goodall Nick Goodall is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Posts: 2,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerM View Post
Interesting!!!!

I always MUCH prefered my B3 to the B4 .... again just a matter of it suiting my style better I guess. Might look into getting a stock of bits and pulling the old girl out of retirement!!!
Seriously Roger i think it must be down to set-up or something as the B4 is far superior in every way to the B3, i used to race for Associated until packing up in 2002 - The car was great in the day, and still not bad but i don't believe for a minute anyone would get round better or quicker with a B3 compared to a properly set-up B4.

I came back into racing end of 06 with an old B3 and although did ok with it, the car would not live with B4's - the newer car is such an improvement there's no way i can see how the B3's worth sticking with when the B4 just does everything better?
__________________
http://www.oople.com/forums/image.php?u=559&type=sigpic&dateline=1289902790
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-11-2007
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Nick, I understand where your coming from mate but believe me I went significantly SLOWER with the B4!!!

My car was from the initial batch in the UK and subsequently it was found that the chassis and rear plate weren't as straight as they should be. That aside I went through everything I could think off;

inline and trailing front hubs
25 and 30 deg castor
weight in the front, weight in the rear, weight all over the shop
ALL combinations of standard front link positions
ALL combinations of standdard rear link positions
Custom rear link positions (both longer and shorter)


Everything you could think of. I've been racing since the mid 80s, am an automotive design engineer by trade (specialised in vehicle dynamics .. although I work in fuel systems now) and believe me I really tried.

The problem I had / have with the B4 is that it's just not consistent enough for my liking, it seemed to do something different every lap! I know some of that will be due to me trying to drive around the problem that I had at that point the previous lap but still .... shouldn't have had that sort of problem in the first place though.

The B3 was just so consistent, supper smooth, loads of steering with no sudden loss of rear end only for it to grab like velcro again the moment you started to collect the slide as the B4 always seemed to do. I also liked the fact that the B3 needed so little set-up change ... basically one set-up for high grip, one for slippery .. job done.

The B4 actually put me off 2wd which in turn meant there was no point in going to nationals (too much driving for not enough track time if you just go for one day) and ultimately my defection to 1/8th rallycross. Guess you could say my B4 was bad enough to put me off 1/10th off-road for about 3 years!!

I am more than happy to try another one if I could borrow one of somebody to see if it was just a physical problem with my own car and all the others are awesome, however I doubt it!!!

Part of the problem, I believe, is that the current crop of cars all seem to have been designed with the "point and squirt" driving style in mind and I just can not get my head around that style, always been the part stick, flowing style driver.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-11-2007
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

Roger, I agree with you. The B4 rear end always seemed a little 'random' to me, would do the same thing on the same corner say 3 laps in a row, then would do something random the next lap. I always felt I really needed to be on top of it waiting for it to bite me.

However, I have tried almost everything this year, plus made my own car, and still don't know what I'll run next year

I might just have to get the B3 off the wall and give it a try, or perhaps a black tub team car

G
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-11-2007
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Glad it isn't just me then!

I'm thinking of one of the mid motor cars or ..... shock horror ... a Kyosho RB5
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-11-2007
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

I've run an S2 and an X-6, and the rear end of those cars IS very consisntant!

I've been tempted with an RB5, but don't want to go it alone.

Still undecided.

G
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-11-2007
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Sounds like my thoughts on the B4's issue being one of weight distribution (hence saying it was built for point and squirt) might well be correct. Suspension geometry looks fine TBH .... never did work it out.

My main concern with S2 is that I've not seen one yet ... X6 is the importers not being helpful at all when I tried to get some info off them recently and the RB5 being one of spares availability, although Dom at DC Racing tells me it shouldn't be a problem!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-11-2007
Northy's Avatar
Northy Northy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Malton, North Yorkshire - Gods Country
Posts: 8,364
Blog Entries: 15
Default

It depends how much of a rush you are in, but the production version of the S2 sounds like it will be very nice indeed!

G
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-11-2007
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

No rush really .... currently on a new car every two weeks ... LOL .... they have a 13 days on that score ...

I contacted OldTimer and he wasn't letting on so for me at least the S2 is still an invisible car! We'll see
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-11-2007
MK999's Avatar
MK999 MK999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Banbury
Posts: 509
Default

I've always looked at the B4 and it's strange weight distribution and wished I could move it around myself, I saw a quick dremel job that tris did to move the batteries into saddle pack formation in the middle of the car and although it had no rear end grip (as far as i know it was running on standard setup) it looked to me to be very quick and stable changing direction and ever since I keep looking at my b4 and then back to the dremel, then onto the gearbox to see how i can turn it round .

I'm sure I used to go much better with my hyper 7 but that was over 2 years ago and an entirely different class, so i'm not sure if it's just inexperience or the car since i always had a very point and stab driving style just like the B4 is supposed to like, but I'd still love to try something like an S2 as the weight distribution to me just looks far more 'right' in terms of where it should be in a car. I'm an undergrad motorsport engineer myself, technically as of next year but I started on homework early, and my housemates are doing the same course almost so theres plenty of discussions/arguments about vehicle dynamics
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 13-11-2007
Welshy40's Avatar
Welshy40 Welshy40 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: .
Posts: 4,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerM View Post
Nick, I understand where your coming from mate but believe me I went significantly SLOWER with the B4!!!

My car was from the initial batch in the UK and subsequently it was found that the chassis and rear plate weren't as straight as they should be. That aside I went through everything I could think off;

inline and trailing front hubs
25 and 30 deg castor
weight in the front, weight in the rear, weight all over the shop
ALL combinations of standard front link positions
ALL combinations of standdard rear link positions
Custom rear link positions (both longer and shorter)


Everything you could think of. I've been racing since the mid 80s, am an automotive design engineer by trade (specialised in vehicle dynamics .. although I work in fuel systems now) and believe me I really tried.

The problem I had / have with the B4 is that it's just not consistent enough for my liking, it seemed to do something different every lap! I know some of that will be due to me trying to drive around the problem that I had at that point the previous lap but still .... shouldn't have had that sort of problem in the first place though.

The B3 was just so consistent, supper smooth, loads of steering with no sudden loss of rear end only for it to grab like velcro again the moment you started to collect the slide as the B4 always seemed to do. I also liked the fact that the B3 needed so little set-up change ... basically one set-up for high grip, one for slippery .. job done.

The B4 actually put me off 2wd which in turn meant there was no point in going to nationals (too much driving for not enough track time if you just go for one day) and ultimately my defection to 1/8th rallycross. Guess you could say my B4 was bad enough to put me off 1/10th off-road for about 3 years!!

I am more than happy to try another one if I could borrow one of somebody to see if it was just a physical problem with my own car and all the others are awesome, however I doubt it!!!

Part of the problem, I believe, is that the current crop of cars all seem to have been designed with the "point and squirt" driving style in mind and I just can not get my head around that style, always been the part stick, flowing style driver.
I agree with you 100%. I didnt feel that driving the B4 was as consistent than the B3, hence why i have bought another B3. Like you the car suits my style of driving.
__________________
www.kamtec.co.uk
www.fibre-lyte.co.uk
answer-rc.com/uk/en/
Answer UK team driver
Designer of the Lazer ZX/ZXR carbon fibre tub chassis
Designer of the Lazer ZXRS
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com