|
|
View Poll Results: What is your view of reduced carbon footprint for an R/C product? | |||
I have no interest in reduced carbon footprint and/or I will always go for a lower price. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
61 | 74.39% |
I am interested in reduced carbon footprint but cannot afford it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 4.88% |
If two products have a similar price, a reduced carbon footprint will be a decisive advantage. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 14.63% |
I am willing to pay a slightly higher price for a product with reduced carbon footprint. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 6.10% |
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to agree with Paul. Economics currently are ahead of principles due to the ongoing recession.
The cynic in me smiles wryly when informed that one of the hardest hit markets over the past couple of years is the "organic/fair trade" fruit / veg / coffe / free range eggs stuff. The people who were buying this on principle a couple of years ago have gone back to the cheaper, less politically correct versions. Charity begins at home.... ![]() |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've all started reducing our carbon foot print by using lipo cells and brushless motors.
![]() Years ago we would have 5 packs of cells now I have just the one. You would change motor brushes every run, skim motors all day and use motor spray ect. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So like I said, my opinion is design an Eco-RC car but majority of people will choose it if it is good/the best first and foremost. But price it far above the current market trend and it won't sell in high numbers. Im not knocking anyone, good luck! ![]() |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've seen that global warming thing advertised on the telly (during dealiest catch I think), I'd like to speed it up a bit as I'm off on holiday to Scotland next week.
Does anyone know when that acid rain will come, I seem to have been waiting for that for about 15 years?
__________________
SP12/RC10/XLS/JRX-2/XX/XXCR/XXCR-KE/XXX/XXXBK2/CR2/Xpro/B4/XX4/XXX4/X5/X11/DEX410/DEX210/DNX408/8ight/VW Golf GTI MK2/VW Golf TDI Wagon/Ovlov V70 D5/VW Beetle II (registered to Carrie)/Bailey Ranger/(does anyone read this bullshit?)/Creda Tumble2/HotPoint FE800/BOSCH SGS45C02GB/Dyson DC04/new patio doors & windows/freshly painted bannister rail & skirting boards, baby. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stu,
I think a quick scan of Wiki or Goole will show that some north European countries had had significant issues with acid rain. It's decimated some forests.... As for the global warming..I want that too! ![]() |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just out of interest, where in the RC part/car supply/value chain do you think the "Eco-unfriendlyness" occurs?
The production of moulds? The materials themselves - not being biodegradable (although I cant see many containing so called banned metals and compunds such as chromium and lead). The packaging of the products? The fuel used by the planes/boat to ship from point of origin to the distributors, and then the fuel used by UPS, FEDex, Parcelforce etc to ship the parts to model shops? Just curious... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you talking about the imprint left from a carbon chassis as it slams in to the ground off a massive jump?
If so it depends on the scale of the model........... |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If, at no cost to yourselves, and performance was the same, but you had a chance of trading in a broken pair of wishbones, get a small discount on a new pair, whilst the old broken ones are returned and reused in the mix to make new wishbones?
Also, why aren't the tyres recycled, I am sure Schumacher could do that easily enough?
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man! |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've had a tip off- global warming is a myth but shh!!
![]() ![]() |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What happened to bird flu and swine flu... Im guessing man flu is still worse.
![]() |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() I'm not far from being a coffin dodger so couldn't give a hoot
__________________
o0ple Trader Feedback NE Venue's New & Old my space on YouTube CFR RCTV Channel Glenn Atterton BRCA 2005 1/10th Off-Road Veterans Champion LMP12 National Champion 2003/2004 / F3 class |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In my opinion... they'd have to be mad. ![]() |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has to be bollox, it's always the 'wettest' or 'hottest' or 'coldest' since some date in the 1970's, or whenever - so it must have settled down since then.
There is a local forest up here that I go cycling in irregularly, no acid rain damage there so as far as I'm concerned I'm still waiting. I'm with Glen in that I don't give a ****.
__________________
SP12/RC10/XLS/JRX-2/XX/XXCR/XXCR-KE/XXX/XXXBK2/CR2/Xpro/B4/XX4/XXX4/X5/X11/DEX410/DEX210/DNX408/8ight/VW Golf GTI MK2/VW Golf TDI Wagon/Ovlov V70 D5/VW Beetle II (registered to Carrie)/Bailey Ranger/(does anyone read this bullshit?)/Creda Tumble2/HotPoint FE800/BOSCH SGS45C02GB/Dyson DC04/new patio doors & windows/freshly painted bannister rail & skirting boards, baby. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looking at Stu's sig i'd say he'd buy any car, low carbon foot print or not!
![]()
__________________
www.insidelineracing.co.uk |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
simple answer is NO, i don't give a fuck!
we're already being raped through taxation for this and every other "crisis" they can quote while demanding ever more money out of us ![]() plus i dont leave footprints anyway because i drive everywhere in my V8!
__________________
JQ Racing - Ultimate Racing - SMD - Nitrolux Fuel - J Concepts - Nuclear-RC - Sandy Point Clothing - |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
o0ple Trader Feedback NE Venue's New & Old my space on YouTube CFR RCTV Channel Glenn Atterton BRCA 2005 1/10th Off-Road Veterans Champion LMP12 National Champion 2003/2004 / F3 class |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The carbon footprint (and what a load of PC new Labour bollox that term is) is totally irrelevant.
If we are trying to cut down the amount of good / fuels used then reduce packaging. The packaging used to promote goods is the biggest waste. The story that transportation is the highest part of a carbon footprint is also rubbish. Most goods are trasnported on enourmous ships crammed with 40ft containers that are filled to over 95% capacity. the authors (OP) term "do you racers" also has a negative connotation that he is not a racer, and is looking at us from the outside. Anyone notice how "global warming" has disappeared from goverment speak. It was replaced with "climate change". It's hard to tax a problem that doesnt exist and after the proof that GW does not exist in a taxable form the term was withdrawn. I recall the trip to the arctic circle that was made with some prominent MP's and pop stars. this was made with the intention of proving how ice caps were depleting. It's a shame that as part of their indoctrination the photo's used to show how it used to be were made in the winter, and the trip was made in the summer. Similar story with the dry rivers / lakes of Russia. Again the politicians forgot to mention the dam that had been built to divert the water that was now providing electricity for hundreds of thousands of homes. As a final note, isnt carbon the basis for life on this planet? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|