Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > General Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 20-04-2007
MK999's Avatar
MK999 MK999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Banbury
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
If both top (link) and lower (arm) are of equal length, you can have short arms and zero camber rise.
Track width changes radically with equal length links, especially short ones
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20-04-2007
super__dan's Avatar
super__dan super__dan is offline
#1 ZX5 fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,482
Default

Course there is a train of thought which says centring the weight front to back is more important than side to side, hence the X6 which has the motor inboard so the moment of inertia when looking in plan is less than a conventional 2wd.

Stretching the weight right out front to back in my opinion will benefit in roll but may make jumps and front to back responce overbumps and ripples worse.

It's all a massive compromise and a guessing game, slim cars I like though, I liked Lee's a lot on the weekend.

Lastly I agree camber change is good, can help the rear break away in the middle of the corner as it leans over which can help you pivot to corner faster. Again it's all a compromise IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-04-2007
MK999's Avatar
MK999 MK999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Banbury
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoughtyUK.net View Post
sometimes camber change is a good thing, I have found that there is an 'optimum' lenght for suspension arms and that is less than 'longest'
All depends on where you're moving from and by how much, but by controlling the amount of change in camber you get by having longer links you can tune everything else more finely, some camber change is a good thing as when the suspension moves into droop position during lateral load transfer the wheels camber negatively slightly and that helps the wheel that needs it most (outside one) get the most possible contact patch while the body rolls without having it cambered in a straight line which would lose you a little straight line speed.

Ideally you should use a longer top and bottom link to obtain the same geometry you would get using a shorter arm to get the same camber change with less track with change, which we don't have the luxury of doing generally with RC cars, but this 'ideal' setup also ends up with a car with amazing cornering power but all the stability of weak jelly in an earthquake zone that no one without absolutely perfect precision and reflexes can drive... at the end of the day, the best setup is the one you can drive fastest really.

Also tire scrub I thought was any time that the tire is moving at a slower/faster speed than the car/ground underneath it? i.e steering with a locked differential with bad ackerman settings. Wheels moving in and out I'd express as "a change in track width"

I'm doing motorsport engineering next year at uni and been doing my background research hence the knowledge (or lack) of it and that's what i understand of it, feel free to correct though

/essay end

edit in response to prev post: everything you can do to your car is a compromise really, never ever get something for nothing (even if you go from running on 3 wheels to 4, more drag !)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 23-04-2007
Dirt-Racer's Avatar
Dirt-Racer Dirt-Racer is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cali-4-Ni-A
Posts: 28
Send a message via MSN to Dirt-Racer
Default

Camber change is beneficial when racing on loose dirt, i think.
__________________
www.tamiyaclub.com nice site if you like some vintage rc..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com