Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > KYOSHO

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361  
Old 18-01-2013
jonathan may's Avatar
jonathan may jonathan may is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: plymouth
Posts: 825
Default

What amount of rear toe-in does it have kit standard
__________________
Schumacher cougar laydown
Reply With Quote
  #362  
Old 18-01-2013
adam_u's Avatar
adam_u adam_u is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 262
Default

3 deg
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #363  
Old 18-01-2013
jonathan may's Avatar
jonathan may jonathan may is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: plymouth
Posts: 825
Default

new to kyosho cars how is it adjusted hubs or brace ?
__________________
Schumacher cougar laydown
Reply With Quote
  #364  
Old 18-01-2013
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Currently only option is to adjust with hubs ....
Reply With Quote
  #365  
Old 18-01-2013
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danmurphy View Post
Should there be an optional plastic RF wide suspension mount on the parts tree for the mid motor config? Or do I need to buy the alloy option mount to reduce my rear toe in?
Kit parts for mid motor are the wide spec already, if you want to reduce rear toe use the option hubs mounted on the opposite sides to marked.
Reply With Quote
  #366  
Old 18-01-2013
danmurphy's Avatar
danmurphy danmurphy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Great Sutton, Cheshire
Posts: 427
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerM View Post
Kit parts for mid motor are the wide spec already, if you want to reduce rear toe use the option hubs mounted on the opposite sides to marked.
Thanks for the info Roger, I was about to order the RF wide mount
Reply With Quote
  #367  
Old 19-01-2013
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

The ali mount is a good upgrade but certainly not necesary with the RB6
Reply With Quote
  #368  
Old 19-01-2013
bigred5765's Avatar
bigred5765 bigred5765 is offline
Lion-O - King of the Thundercats
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chorley
Posts: 8,474
Send a message via MSN to bigred5765 Send a message via Skype™ to bigred5765
Default

rodger what happens if you use the thin brkt up front and wide rear and vice versa
__________________
Mattys the driver,my names carl
Reply With Quote
  #369  
Old 19-01-2013
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

There is no narrow rear mount for the mid motorr, using the narrow rf block would give you a lot of extra rear toe in, will have to check my notes but I think 1.5deg extra.
Reply With Quote
  #370  
Old 19-01-2013
bigred5765's Avatar
bigred5765 bigred5765 is offline
Lion-O - King of the Thundercats
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chorley
Posts: 8,474
Send a message via MSN to bigred5765 Send a message via Skype™ to bigred5765
Default

so giving 4.5 degree toe on the rear sounds OK to me think we will try it,
i did fit the small front brkt just to see but didn't run it, and yeah i know its front the rear motor car but it is almost identical just thinner,
__________________
Mattys the driver,my names carl
Reply With Quote
  #371  
Old 20-01-2013
pip122872's Avatar
pip122872 pip122872 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: new milford connecticut
Posts: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to pip122872
Default shock tool and turnbuckle wrenches

hi guys i am not a regular on this forum but i am a kyosho driver through and through. i have been making some tools for kyosho cars for a couple months now and would love to share them with as many kyosho drivers as possible. The first tool is a kyosho shock tool for removing the shock cartridge, its a great replacement for the one that comes with the kit and strips out easly. It costs $12 in the u.s and 15 overseas. the second tool s a turn buckle wrench that has three sizes on it. the one side has 2 sizes in it that fit the kyosho turnbuckles as well as the lundsford and ae turnbuckle. it will also fit durangos and any car with a 4mm turmbuckle. the other side is 5.5mm and fits all kyosho 10th scale trucks, the losi 4wd sc and some 8th scale vehicles This wrench is $17 in the u.s. and $19 for over seas. if any of you are interested please email me at [email protected] as i am not always on the forums. thank you for your time and i hope to be able to provide some of you some great tools..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg shock tool with shock.JPG (102.4 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg shock tool.JPG (136.5 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg turnbuckle.JPG (103.1 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg turnbucklewrench.jpg (239.3 KB, 33 views)
Reply With Quote
  #372  
Old 20-01-2013
JustARcFan's Avatar
JustARcFan JustARcFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 800
Default

At this point i'm not really that convinced about the RB6.
The quality is of course perfect, like all Kyosho cars but I prefer the DB1.

Yesterday I had some free time so had a look at the weight distribution in MM. About measuring (and re-measuring) I found out that the front to rear ratio is 59% rear and 41% front?????
Talking about a nose heavy car!

My electric set up was like most of you with a LP servo, receiver at the back of the servo, saddle pack and the esc just in front of the motor.

Re-did all the wires (with 14awg), managed to slide the saddles 6mm more in the rear, put the receiver at the side in the back.
Like this i saved 16gr in the front and the weight bias is now 62,5 / 37,5.

Didn't had the chance to test it like this but I'm sure it's going to be better.
I'm also going to try a stubby lipo, like this the car will be +/- 80gr lighter and around 63,5%.

Cheers
__________________
Yokomo B-Max2 V2 MR
Kyosho DB2


LRP Flow, Orion R10, Orion VST2, Speed Passion, Speed Power, B-Fast, Much More CTX, LRP X 20,
Reply With Quote
  #373  
Old 20-01-2013
danmurphy's Avatar
danmurphy danmurphy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Great Sutton, Cheshire
Posts: 427
Default

If you want more rear bias then maybe you should be running rear motor? I'm quite impressed with the weight balance of the car
Reply With Quote
  #374  
Old 20-01-2013
tomtom's Avatar
tomtom tomtom is offline
No trade access
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 430
Default

After a few months I'm very pleased with mine, especially the overall balance and stability so I wouldn't worry about weight bias that much.

The DB1 is on another league, I totally understand you prefer it over your RB6 as I feel the same yet for my driving skills the RB6 might be easier to run lap after lap and could be set to run good on almost any track.

I will keep both and choose the one to race depending on track and mood. At some point I may choose one and race but the choice today is a hard one.
Reply With Quote
  #375  
Old 20-01-2013
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

The forward weight distribution is what makes the RB6 such a nice car to drive IMHO.
Still loving mine on proper off-road tracks, I massively let the car down indoors but can't blame the car for that!
Reply With Quote
  #376  
Old 20-01-2013
Fabs Fabs is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Default

Personally I've always ran the car with all the electronics behind the short servo, and the cells at the back. When I built the car both my servo and speedo wires were too short to have it any other way.

Am now running shorty in the same way, and after a few tweaks to the setup I can honestly say it's far better than any DB1 I've tried. In fact I've hated the way the DB1 handles, it's defo not a car for me.
Reply With Quote
  #377  
Old 20-01-2013
tomtom's Avatar
tomtom tomtom is offline
No trade access
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 430
Default

You're already fast Fabs !

And your RB5 front end really help to tame the DB agressive feel.
You were right once again

Thanks for your support at our last race !
Reply With Quote
  #378  
Old 20-01-2013
Fabs Fabs is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Default

Aye, but I felt the DB1 was a car to drive "on throttle", it doesn't like to be off power. At least yours didn't! So I felt to be fast, I would have to keep a small amount of throttle through the corner, or it would lose all corner speed. I prefer when a car carries its corner speed "naturally" if you see what I mean?

RB5 front bulkhead and arms makes for a much more predictable front end. Even on the MCS I felt the WC front end was a bit too agressive, but the MCS kinda needed it, whereas on the DB1 it makes the car evil.

No worries mate, I always help if I can.
Reply With Quote
  #379  
Old 20-01-2013
dirkdiggler's Avatar
dirkdiggler dirkdiggler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 32
Default

A young Marshall kindly stood on my rb6 today
and snapped a rear shock shaft ending my day.
I now find that je don't have any in stock or rb5
Or zx5.
Any other alternatives out there that fit?
Reply With Quote
  #380  
Old 20-01-2013
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Kev and Ana have stock and always send parts out quickly.

Dont worry about the RB5/ZX5 listing, the RB6 shares the same rear 50mm shafts.

http://www.the-pred.co.uk/zencart/in...roducts_id=434
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com