Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > Electrics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 20-06-2007
super__dan's Avatar
super__dan super__dan is offline
#1 ZX5 fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,482
Default

In off road I agree most of the time grip is out biggest limiting factor but battery voltage can still be hugely important. If only they could be 7.2V that would be fine with me. Whilst perhaps nimh have crept up past 7.2V nominal, what would then stop Lipo from creeping up past 7.4V nominal.

Unusually on the weekend because of the grass straight line speed (particularly in 2wd) was more important than normal. If I was maxed out for speed and someone was breezing past with Lipo I wouldn't be very happy.

Perhaps in my mind I can't get past how much quicker Jimmy's car was at the vintage with Lipo comparred to our 7.2v cells, the difference as I recal was very noticable.

The rest of the technology personally I'm OK with and recognise they form a large part of our racing future, just such a shame they don't compete on a completely level playing field.
__________________


Nortech is ACE!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 20-06-2007
mole2k's Avatar
mole2k mole2k is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to mole2k
Default

Personally I think Lipo will come but I cant see it being mainstream before 2010+
__________________
Tamiya TRF 501x Worlds Edition
Team Associated B4

www.rcbearings.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrislong View Post
Stop trying to ram these bloody things down our throats! Go back to selling double glazing.

7.2v vs 7.4v is clearly different. Regardless of what magic the matchers work on them, the nominal voltages are different, there is a reason.
tut guess some peeps are still stuck in the 80's
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by super__dan View Post

Unusually on the weekend because of the grass straight line speed (particularly in 2wd) was more important than normal. If I was maxed out for speed and someone was breezing past with Lipo I wouldn't be very happy.

Perhaps in my mind I can't get past how much quicker Jimmy's car was at the vintage with Lipo comparred to our 7.2v cells, the difference as I recal was very noticable.
they could do that now if they were running a better motor or got the gearing spot on.

in a stock motor class they will have an advantage especially if there not run to the same weight limit
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 20-06-2007
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

no, I disagree there Mark, the extra voltage allows you to run the same motor with taller gearing so it drives the same out of the corners, but where as you top out half way down the straight, they keep accelerating.

It isn't so much the nominal voltage, but how the power is produced too. The two couldn't sit very comfortably together, and in a competitive series, would mean everyone buying LiPo.
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCM View Post
no, I disagree there Mark, the extra voltage allows you to run the same motor with taller gearing so it drives the same out of the corners, but where as you top out half way down the straight, they keep accelerating.

It isn't so much the nominal voltage, but how the power is produced too. The two couldn't sit very comfortably together, and in a competitive series, would mean everyone buying LiPo.
so you have seen then run side by side in a series?

i have and there is little differance and lipo did not wipe the floor, nimh was just as fast, and this was in 19 turn where voltage would help
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 20-06-2007
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

with IB cells, and 19t, voltage is a killer not a saviour Mark....
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 20-06-2007
MattW's Avatar
MattW MattW is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,396
Send a message via MSN to MattW
Default

Well, personally i'm very anti LiPo. Nothing to do with the voltage. At the moment, there is little or no development in the LiPo RC market (at least not the development that we can all see in the NiMh market). However, i've spoke to a few poeple in the know and they assure me that if the development was required (i.e they were actually used for racing) then that development would be at a pace that we have never seen before. I said this before - and i believe Mark C started that thread as well.

What i will say though, is that i have run LiPo back to back with IB NiMh cells, and i have to say i didn't notice a difference. In fact, if i'm really being honest, i think new ish Ib's are probably faster. This is a point that was confiremd by a friend of mine at my locak club last week. He's been running LiPo for ages, but bought a couple of packs of NiMh as he needed them for a BRCA meeting.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 20-06-2007
modelimages modelimages is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
ok and a higher voltage (all be it .2volt) does what to amps for the same wattage draw?
at biws in 6 cell touring car lipo and nimh ran side by side lipo took one win, (all cars to same weight) the advantage is in no loss of performance and easier charging.

if miss used they do go bang yes, but so does any form of power cell. to date only nimh has cost one racer a very badly injured eye and another not so good, lipo has non documanted. simply dont miss use em (corectly charge and dont go below 6 volts) and there safe, how many carry em in your pocket? (mobile phone)
to say they go bang and plead ignorance to any other cell being a danger is very poor knowledge!
i have an opinion, i gave it, i don't really need the personel insults, at no point did i plead ignorance to any other cell going bang, i am pointing out that these cells require a little care when in use and when charging and that that is different to the current cells.

voltage differences, yes you can buy nimh packs with nominal voltages of each cell being higher than 1.2v, thats why people spend hours looking through new cells to find those elusive high voltage ones, its why matching companies exist. i just checked the figures on a 6 pack of ib4200 the total for all 6 is 7.41v, thats a top spec and top price matched pack and it equals any 2cell lipo, you would assume therefore that a top spec top price lipo will of course be higher than 7.4. i cannot see how two batteries with different nominal voltages could race together without one racer believing he was at a disadvantage. if your saying that there is no performance difference between these packs then that begs the question why would you fit one, i don't need anymore duration, i would need a different charger and they cost more. not exactly appealing at the moment. so what advantages would buying this type of battery give me?
__________________
www.theraceplace.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by modelimages View Post
i have an opinion, i gave it, i don't really need the personel insults, at no point did i plead ignorance to any other cell going bang, i am pointing out that these cells require a little care when in use and when charging and that that is different to the current cells.

voltage differences, yes you can buy nimh packs with nominal voltages of each cell being higher than 1.2v, thats why people spend hours looking through new cells to find those elusive high voltage ones, its why matching companies exist. i just checked the figures on a 6 pack of ib4200 the total for all 6 is 7.41v, thats a top spec and top price matched pack and it equals any 2cell lipo, you would assume therefore that a top spec top price lipo will of course be higher than 7.4. i cannot see how two batteries with different nominal voltages could race together without one racer believing he was at a disadvantage. if your saying that there is no performance difference between these packs then that begs the question why would you fit one, i don't need anymore duration, i would need a different charger and they cost more. not exactly appealing at the moment. so what advantages would buying this type of battery give me?
it was not meant as a personal insult, but any cell is danjerous and in no way are lipo anymore danjerous as a normal nicad/nimh in use or charge,
its been said on here by many and i will say it again, if you run them in the correct way they are not danjerous, if i abuse nimh they can be danjerous.

they are dearer pack for pack yes BUT two packs will see you for a weekend racing, with no loss in performance
most chargers can do lipo and a good one can be had for £50 which i have posted in this thread along with the other advantages!
weight = can be placed where you want it if you need to run to current weights
need less packs
no need to discharge equalize
no perormance loss over thier life span
can be charged weeks before and dont loose power, fit and go

what does amaze me though is the amount of posters who know all about them but have not actually used them

i have both lipo set up and good nimh so either way im not bothered where it goes, though i do enjoy the lipo ease of use.
i just wanted to see 6 months on how lipo was percieved. more clubs are allowing them and definatly more manufactures (rc ones) are producing/selling them. as i see it many do regionals and not nationals and to me (note to me) they should be allowed at club and possibly regionals.
my stipulation would be only lipo in a hard case, and if using lipo proof should be shown your charger is lipo compatable and poss even a 6 volt cut of is used weather an external or a speedo device (though if you have half a brain the last one is not needed)
i have found that off road electric to be the freindlyist class i have raced this year, with the least amount of rules (only sensible fair ones used) the cheapest by far and dam good fun.
lipo would make it better for me personally but in no way is off road broke or full of borats nieghbours!!
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 20-06-2007
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
what does amaze me though is the amount of posters who know all about them but have not actually used them
It's called research and reading manufacturers technical specification that gives you a grounding on how a particular item works, it isn't rocket science.

You forget to say that most NEW chargers are lipo enabled. I have two chargers here that are not, and four that are.

I will come back to my original concern with the cells, is that, unlike all other cells previously, they could all be charged with older chargers, LiPo can't and needs a specifically LiPo programmed charger, plus, running them below voltage causes issue's too. This is where the crux of the problem is, for me. Where as the educated racer will know what to do, the majority of bashers and club level racers wont. There is no backward compatibility in them.
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 20-06-2007
Cockerill Cockerill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
what does amaze me though is the amount of posters who know all about them but have not actually used them
Thats because most racers on here race at BRCA sanctioned events, therefore cannot justify buying LIPO packs that cannot be used. However, we can still read up about them.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cockerill View Post
Thats because most racers on here race at BRCA sanctioned events, therefore cannot justify buying LIPO packs that cannot be used. However, we can still read up about them.
is that why club numbers are down? thay all do nationals and no club racing?
how many national racers chargers are lipo ready?
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 20-06-2007
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

Mark, this has a veil of you trying to provoke discussion/argument.

Lots of clubs run to BRCA rules, so LiPo ain't allowed, period, till they are allowed and then it will be at the clubs discretion.

No matter how much you 'Big Up' LiPo, till people are comfortable with a totally new power source...... you are wasting bandwidth.
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 20-06-2007
neiloliver neiloliver is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 1,208
Default

The nominal voltage of Nickel coupled cells (NiCd and NiMH) is based on the electrochemical couple which is around 1.20V. The actually running voltage depends on the load mostly but the age of the cell also reduces running voltage. Cell manufacturers can also add additives to both the electrodes and electrolyete to increase voltage, usually at the expense of another performance attribute (this is one of the reasons why IB4200 cells have such high voltage but they dont last very long in terms of cycles).

For Lithium ion and lithium polymer cells, the voltage is based on the average voltage when the cell is discharged at the 5 hour rate and this is typically 3.6V or 3.7V (Some of the cylindrical 18650 cells developed for power tools are now 3.8V) at this 5 hour rate.

Personally, i think lithium polymer is the wrong cell technology for RC cars, the 18650 (18.0mm diameter and 65mm height cell) which has been used in notebooks for the past 10+ years is now finally making it's way into powertool although the cells are only around 1.5Ah in capacity due to their need to deliver high currents.

A 2S2P 18650 battery pack would be ~7.4V 3000mAh and could be manufactured in either stick or saddle pack, have built in electronics for over voltage protection and over discharge protection (like a power tool battery). The current situation in which cells rely on the user to protect them is not a good one. It would not be entertained in the "real" world of consumer electronics and OEM electronic products. I wont let a lithium ion battery leave our factory without adequate protection and customer who want unprotected cells are told to buy them from someone else...

There are great LiIon possibilities for RC cars but i think the technology should be adopted from the powertool market in the same way as NiCd and NiCd was (because if it was not for powertool, the Cs cell would not exist).

The last bit of my rant is about transport. Did you know that transporting Lithium ion cells or batteries is being controlled more and more, they have to undergo many safety tests before they can be transported on aircraft. Any modification to these cells or batteries woudl mean a re-test. Anyone who buys cells and makes their own battery and then takes them on an aircraft woudl be breaking international law. Pre-tested, assembled battery packs are the only way this can go in the future.

N
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 20-06-2007
Chrislong's Avatar
Chrislong Chrislong is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury
Posts: 4,196
Default

Hi Mark, email Charlie Fraser who is the secretary for the BRCA with the proposal of Lipo at regional level for the AGM. Next, make sure you go and attend the AGM later this year and be the one to vote it, it may get seconded and approved or there may be valid reason that it can't be - if so, they'll be explained... either way, will you be content?

Spoiling of a thread with many arguements isn't healthy, and surely the above should be done before it really is worth continueing with any discussion.

From my point of view, I will not consider buying Lipo until it is allowed at nationals, and proven to me that it is better (purely performance wise) than Nimphs.
__________________
JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares
www.jespares.com
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 20-06-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
it was not meant as a personal insult, but any cell is danjerous and in no way are lipo anymore danjerous as a normal nicad/nimh in use or charge,
its been said on here by many and i will say it again, if you run them in the correct way they are not danjerous, if i abuse nimh they can be danjerous.

they are dearer pack for pack yes BUT two packs will see you for a weekend racing, with no loss in performance
most chargers can do lipo and a good one can be had for £50 which i have posted in this thread along with the other advantages!
weight = can be placed where you want it if you need to run to current weights
need less packs
no need to discharge equalize
no perormance loss over thier life span
can be charged weeks before and dont loose power, fit and go

what does amaze me though is the amount of posters who know all about them but have not actually used them

i have both lipo set up and good nimh so either way im not bothered where it goes, though i do enjoy the lipo ease of use.
i just wanted to see 6 months on how lipo was percieved. more clubs are allowing them and definatly more manufactures (rc ones) are producing/selling them. as i see it many do regionals and not nationals and to me (note to me) they should be allowed at club and possibly regionals.
my stipulation would be only lipo in a hard case, and if using lipo proof should be shown your charger is lipo compatable and poss even a 6 volt cut of is used weather an external or a speedo device (though if you have half a brain the last one is not needed)
i have found that off road electric to be the freindlyist class i have raced this year, with the least amount of rules (only sensible fair ones used) the cheapest by far and dam good fun.
lipo would make it better for me personally but in no way is off road broke or full of borats nieghbours!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrislong View Post
Hi Mark, email Charlie Fraser who is the secretary for the BRCA with the proposal of Lipo at regional level for the AGM. Next, make sure you go and attend the AGM later this year and be the one to vote it, it may get seconded and approved or there may be valid reason that it can't be - if so, they'll be explained... either way, will you be content?

Spoiling of a thread with many arguements isn't healthy, and surely the above should be done before it really is worth continueing with any discussion.

From my point of view, I will not consider buying Lipo until it is allowed at nationals, and proven to me that it is better (purely performance wise) than Nimphs.
Chris
your red questions is answered in my previous post (in red)
there is no point in proposing it if the majority of racers on here dont want it (most on here would be at the agm),if its not wanted by the majority i have no intention of trying to force/push lipo in.
as i have put off road aint broke and i have all the eqiupment i need to run either cell format!
as i have put before i was interested in what had changed with drivers views now they are more "out there"
it seems to me those who have them like em, those who dont are either not sure or go on what they read resulting in some for and some against.


DCM i have asked for it to be discussed is that not what a forum is for?
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 20-06-2007
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Lee-Mag
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: More north than Northy!!
Posts: 6,943
Default

Im no lipo fan either, i have run them in the TC a while ago and at the time they did give a slight performance increase, but this only helped to throw a wind quicker so therefore rendered them useless.

In off road we dont need more runtime, we dont need more "power" and frankly if i wasnt charging cells between runs i would have nothing to do once i go brushless.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 20-06-2007
mole2k's Avatar
mole2k mole2k is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to mole2k
Default

My local club runs 19t buggys indoors on polished wood, I would quite like to see Lipo purely from a maintenance factor. It would leave me free to do more work on the car or help some of the other members.

I do agree with Neil Oliver that I think the packs should come pre-assembled perhaps with just the option of a splitting a stick pack and have discharge protection circuitry built into the battery itself. You very well may argue that this is unessecary as some speedo's have it but the fact still remains a lot of speedo's do not have the lipo protection.
__________________
Tamiya TRF 501x Worlds Edition
Team Associated B4

www.rcbearings.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 20-06-2007
PaulRotheram's Avatar
PaulRotheram PaulRotheram is offline
Supah doOpah
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,863
Send a message via MSN to PaulRotheram
Default

i cant see where people are coming from with having more spare time by running lipos.. how long does it take to press the bloody start button with nimhs?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com