|
#121
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() THATS A JOKE NICK |
#122
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There ain't no nicer shade of blue than the Tamiya one
![]() I am looking forward to seeing how the 502 and 417 perform. I'm saving already although I hope they release it with a new shell though, as the 511 is a minger compared to the 501x
__________________
http://www.thercracer.com/ |
#123
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#124
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Anyway, I am digging the thought of Tamiya keeping the 511 in production (hopefully) along with this new shafty ![]() ![]()
__________________
TRF501X - 201 |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'd hope the db02 would still be belt drive, but 501x/511 layout with the saddles in the rear, motor up front
|
#126
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, the DF03 chassis is being discontinued from what I can tell, so it wouldn't be that far fetched honestly. Let's hope for the best!
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
DB02 would be a plastic shaft drive, stick pack down one side, electrics down the other. |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Would it be a DB02 though or a DF04?!
It'll take them a while to release it though as they will have to think of a more reeeediculoous name to replace the Keen Hawk and Durga! |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to what I heard, trf502 should be a bit cheaper than trf511 (still on the expensive side, though).
|
#130
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With the DB-01 Dirk Diggler and Baldrick, we got to have a DF-04 Ron Jeremy!
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man! |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would be a df04. Probably called something like the log munch or something which translates badly.
__________________
http://www.thercracer.com/ |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think TRF502X "Basic" version, so no aeration dampers etc. Same platform though.
|
#134
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Its gotta be the DB02. The DF series don't share any of the parts from the 501/511 so there would be no reason to call it a DF04
![]()
__________________
Mark Dyson Clown |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Anyway we are getting away from the discussion about the BJ4WE, er I mean 502! ![]() |
#136
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You´re right peetbee, does anyone know the following: in th CAD drwaing it looks as if the Slipper can only be adjusted when out of the car, or can you adjust it buy holding the 7mm Lock nut with a gripper while someone else turns the wheels to make it tighter or looser? This would mean you need 3 hands to adjust it... |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or you could use a 7mm key there's well enough space in the top deck for that. Hell it might even be provided
![]() |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yeah fair call, though its not impossible for them to set the car up so it could cope with both layouts, i guess it was more of a hope than a prediction, lol
|
#140
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Speculating once more, it could be called a DS01, as in D "Shaft" 01. similar to D "Belt" 01 or DB01.
Anyone wonder why the DTs were 2wd and the DFs were 4wd? Clue's in the name, DTwo or DFour, of course, I'm just guessing and I like to think that the letters do actually mean something rather than some slant just messing around with his alphabeti spageti at teatime.
__________________
Answer RC SWorkz 35-3 SWorkz 350T SWorkz S12-2 Instagram: crazylthirteen Blogger: http://the-croucher.blogspot.co.uk/ |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|