Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Tamiya

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 10-09-2010
/tobys /tobys is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 1,370
Default

yes but that's the hop-up item, unless it's now in kits?

TBH, with brushless, I change the motor so infrequently it's not that much of a hassle - except when I have to change motor or pinion
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 10-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Hmm, almost looks like there's two distinct options on battery position, though those holes could be for the undertray etc!? Also looks like a full air vent below the motor this time, but what I can't quite see is how that motor position works with the 511 shell they've been running, it won't finunder it will it, the air vent won't line up to fit it under either!?
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 10-09-2010
GRIFF55 GRIFF55 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sunny South West Wales
Posts: 4,875
Default

The hole under the motor is like most of the shaft drive cars mate. I do think that the 511 shell would fit over the layout. Hey, just go build that other belt drive beauty, you know you want to Cant go wrong with the 511 mate. Wait and see how this goes
__________________
~ICON-RC~ATOMIC CARBON~LMR~TONISPORT~NUCLEAR RC~
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 10-09-2010
MattADH MattADH is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF_AK View Post
More detail.
Am I right in thinking that on the third image, it looks like the car has more negative camber on the right front than the left...
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 10-09-2010
TRF_AK's Avatar
TRF_AK TRF_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 87
Default

The beauty of CAD

The TRF511 shell is what the TRF drivers used at the JMRCA.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jm_off_1.jpg (22.2 KB, 97 views)
File Type: jpg jm_off_3.jpg (20.2 KB, 80 views)
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 11-09-2010
moth898's Avatar
moth898 moth898 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 588
Default

is it me or does the right seem to be low on both pics....a side effect of the shaft drive tork maybe
__________________
SHUMACHER CAT SX
SHUMACHER COUGAR SV
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 11-09-2010
cmgreen's Avatar
cmgreen cmgreen is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gods Country-Tyne & Wear
Posts: 1,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northy View Post
Loving the BJ4 clone references.....

G

The bj4 we shell would even fit
__________________
'There are two choices in life-Take it or leave it !'

Yokomo - Nemoracing
Sb Designs
http://www.fairfueluk.com/
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 11-09-2010
Mr. Red Mr. Red is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moth898 View Post
is it me or does the right seem to be low on both pics....a side effect of the shaft drive tork maybe
He he, my thought exactly. Have been having a discussion on swedish forum regarding the position of the motor. I believe the motor should be placed like on the Durango or Kyosho FS. Think both the B44 and yokes and what not are wrong. And now this. Am I totally wrong or what?

Otherwise this car looks awsome. Especially like the large diffballs bit. Works great on the 511 and touringcars. Much like if you have wide tires on your real car. Better traction.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 11-09-2010
MRD's Avatar
MRD MRD is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cleckhuddersfax
Posts: 882
Default

I can't believe what a B44/BJ4 copy that is. Surely they could have come up with something a bit different.

Thing is those cars were designed with heavy NiMh's in mind. We don't use them anymore so why have the cells at the back so we have to add weight.

Com'on Tamiya. You're getting as bad as Ansmann.
__________________
Mark Dyson

Clown
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 11-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRD View Post
I can't believe what a B44/BJ4 copy that is. Surely they could have come up with something a bit different.

Thing is those cars were designed with heavy NiMh's in mind. We don't use them anymore so why have the cells at the back so we have to add weight.

Com'on Tamiya. You're getting as bad as Ansmann.
This is the bit I don't get sorry, what did you expect? The suspension/dampers/towers are carry over 511, and when you make it shaft what are your options, motor has to go either front or rear and to the side, rear means putting the cells at the front, they are STILL the heaviest item, you still need them at the back!! It's very difficult to make stick lacks fit past the spur without a very wide car, so what did you think they'd do? It's either a bj4 copy or a Durango copy, that's their two options!

As I said earlier, if you want to have a go about copying, do it about the 501!!

Oh, sorry, forgot, they could have made it plastic and you'd have called it a bmax clone!!

Ultimately, it will almost certainly have unique weight distribution, the top decks are clearly different design/flax, the steering will probably end up being Tamiya (a guess admittedly!), and the suspension carries ver from their own Euro/Brit champ winning 511, what more would you expect?
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 11-09-2010
RBX RBX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 42
Default

I wonder if the trf502 will give birth to a DB02 and it will be a plastic chassis shaft driven sport racer Durga II!?? hmmmmmm
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 11-09-2010
MRD's Avatar
MRD MRD is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cleckhuddersfax
Posts: 882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG28 View Post
This is the bit I don't get sorry, what did you expect? The suspension/dampers/towers are carry over 511, and when you make it shaft what are your options, motor has to go either front or rear and to the side, rear means putting the cells at the front, they are STILL the heaviest item, you still need them at the back!! It's very difficult to make stick lacks fit past the spur without a very wide car, so what did you think they'd do? It's either a bj4 copy or a Durango copy, that's their two options!

As I said earlier, if you want to have a go about copying, do it about the 501!!

Oh, sorry, forgot, they could have made it plastic and you'd have called it a bmax clone!!

Ultimately, it will almost certainly have unique weight distribution, the top decks are clearly different design/flax, the steering will probably end up being Tamiya (a guess admittedly!), and the suspension carries ver from their own Euro/Brit champ winning 511, what more would you expect?

I expected something with a bit more individuality, something that stands out as a Tamiya with some forward thinking ideas. I understand that options are limited but Durango and Kyosho managed to differ from the BJ4 and still have good cars.
__________________
Mark Dyson

Clown
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 11-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRD View Post
I expected something with a bit more individuality, something that stands out as a Tamiya with some forward thinking ideas. I understand that options are limited but Durango and Kyosho managed to differ from the BJ4 and still have good cars.
Until you see them side by side you've no idea how similar the 502 is to the b44 though?

Having said that, I bet when it does happen it turns out to be pretty bloody similar
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 11-09-2010
Fabs Fabs is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Default

Tamiya never make innovative cars, what they're best at doing is make a car that's a blend of all the good ideas on the market, and add the tamiya quality...
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 11-09-2010
MRD's Avatar
MRD MRD is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cleckhuddersfax
Posts: 882
Default

Thats probably right for the TRF cars but the normal stuff is pretty funky like the FF03 Pro with front motor front wheel drive and IFS. They've had some other crackers like the TA03F and the 3Speed High lift.

Thats the reason I own all those cars, I like the oddball stuff .

Got about 30 tamiyas now.

The new pro drift car is quite tastey too.
__________________
Mark Dyson

Clown
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 11-09-2010
Fabs Fabs is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Default

Yes I meant proper TRF cars with numbers, TC and Off Road alike.

Maybe the TRF 211X was a little different but since?
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 11-09-2010
muratti's Avatar
muratti muratti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria/EUROPE
Posts: 764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabs View Post
Tamiya never make innovative cars, what they're best at doing is make a car that's a blend of all the good ideas on the market, and add the tamiya quality...
They so since a few year, basically since there is TRF. Remember the Avante or the Egress, not as they were good racers but you have to admit they were kind innovative and way ahead of their time.

The 502 is exactly the car i was waiting for since i stopped racing my Top Force Evolution some years ago!!
__________________
Xray XB4 ‚18
My showroom: http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom.asp?id=10777
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 11-09-2010
DaveG28's Avatar
DaveG28 DaveG28 is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muratti View Post
They so since a few year, basically since there is TRF. Remember the Avante or the Egress, not as they were good racers but you have to admit they were kind innovative and way ahead of their time.

The 502 is exactly the car i was waiting for since i stopped racing my Top Force Evolution some years ago!!
I'm looking forward to it too, all the negativity on here about shaft drive kind of ignores that before this year the last 3 years uk nationals were won by shaft drive, there's clearly nothing wrong with it! And it's not like the b44/bj4 has been unsuccessful!!
__________________
Dave "Amish FJ" Gibson
RB Products ~ Yokomo
Nuclear RC ~ Xpert ~ Hacker
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 11-09-2010
GRIFF55 GRIFF55 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sunny South West Wales
Posts: 4,875
Default

+1. I'm looking forward to seeing/getting one of these in the flesh. Being TRF, it will be hard not to be good, clone or not.
I will be keeping my 511, but have one of these for a play
__________________
~ICON-RC~ATOMIC CARBON~LMR~TONISPORT~NUCLEAR RC~
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 11-09-2010
njc11's Avatar
njc11 njc11 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,116
Default

Why dont you all look at the Kyosho Lazer FS2...???? Tamiya have seen this car and are worried..

Thats shaft drive...

and has a nicer shade of blue too on all the ally bits!

Kyosho will be a force in 2011!!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com