Kidderminster National - May 12th + 13th 2007.

[jimmy]

The 4WD went from your best time from the two rounds - not your position in either round or after both rounds.

I think.

[Chris Doughty]

the 'overall' results for the kiddy meeting are working on best 2 from 2

the official results are best single SCORE out of 2 rounds.

so, if 2 different people had 1's from rounds 1 and 2 they would be first and second, they would be sorted by count-back which is best race time.

if the person with a 1 broke in the other round and scored 120, they would be waaay down if it was 2 to count from 2 which is how the 'overall' results posted on the BRCA site are worked out.

basically, the 'meeting results' on the BRCA site are not exactly correct considering it is/was and abandand meeting.

[Chris Doughty]

Originally Posted by jimmy

The 4WD went from your best time from the two rounds - not your position in either round or after both rounds.

I think.

your wrong Jimmy, it was best single SCORE out of 2 rounds, time was only considered when it went to tied scores.

[jimmy]

Ok, I was misinformed - Must have been the overall winner, lee, that applied to then.

[Rossco_4]

Originally Posted by DoughtyUK.net

your wrong Jimmy, it was best single SCORE out of 2 rounds, time was only considered when it went to tied scores.

Ok, if it was the best single score out of the 2 rounds that still doesn't make sense..... my best round finish was 36th. 130 subtract 36 is 94, but my score from kiddy on the nationals series page is 85

[Doomanic]

35 people were faster than you in that round, chances are that some people went faster in round 1 but dnf'd round 2 and so knocked you further down the order.

[_sleigh_]

Originally Posted by Rossco_4

Ok, if it was the best single score out of the 2 rounds that still doesn't make sense..... my best round finish was 36th. 130 subtract 36 is 94, but my score from kiddy on the nationals series page is 85

Some results do look a little wrong, as two people have exactly the same points from Kiddy in the 4WD overall results. The only normal way this can happen is if the TQ man finishes second (as they get an extra point for TQ)

[super__dan]

There are only 120 drivers in 4wd though so it's from 120 not 130 surely?

[Rossco_4]

120 would make sense, but the top guys were scoring up to 130

[Stu]

Blimey, when I said "lets pretend to give Chris a kicking" I didn't expect it to look quite that realistic.

If we do that stunt again I think it sould be 'toned down' a bit -



It looks terrible.

[jimmy]

It made me laugh Stu

[Stu]

I suspect you have some that should never see the light of day?

Especially as I have my BRCA shirt on - oOops.

[jimmy]

Oh yeah, I have a photo of you beating Ashley also, but I thought one beating was enough

[Stu]

Hmmm, but have you got one of Ashley laying into us, that one would be a winner.

[PaulRotheram]

This is how us north western drivers are treated if we step out of line and stu has to step in.. mr long was obviously in for a beating for missing round 1 at southport

[Stu]

It's actually me that needs a real kicking, for loosing the pictures from Saturday night.

[PaulRotheram]

dont worry dude.. theyd of been ace, but the memory is there.. maggie.. lampost.. chavs.. speed camera.. hedge..

the list alone shows how random a night it was

[ashleyb4]

You wait until bury stu i so wanted to see the cheese photo's so now you will have to meet K and O

Come on jimmy get the rest of the pics up of us beeting each other up.

A

[_sleigh_]

Originally Posted by super__dan

There are only 120 drivers in 4wd though so it's from 120 not 130 surely?

No, both championships are scored out of 130 for continuity.

[mw02veg]