Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > Electrics

View Poll Results: Lipo or NiMh ... your preference if it were free choice
NiMh 8 7.62%
Lipo 82 78.10%
Undecided 15 14.29%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-03-2008
Col's Avatar
Col Col is offline
Awesome Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: York
Posts: 4,571
Send a message via AIM to Col
Default

I didn't read it that way!
What I thought it meant was that TC modified is the main event and TC stock (or whatever it's called) is the support class - just like F1 being the main event and TOCA touring cars being support to them

p.s. voted lipo
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-03-2008
MattW's Avatar
MattW MattW is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,396
Send a message via MSN to MattW
Default

I've voted undecided, and i'll tell you why.

At the moment, LiPo hasn't been used in any "competative" race series, and you could argue that this isn't going to change in 2008 - because yes technically the touring car pro stock series is considdered "the support".

However, i have this view that because of this - there would seem to have been little/no development. Many People are using their Orion platignm packs (one of the first to be released i believe) and they are competative and similar in running to anything on the market. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Anyway, i believe that as soon as they are allowed in a "premier" class - we will see an upward development path the like of which we have never seen before.

Anyone remember the first NiMh cells?? We were told that NiMh was much more stable than NiCad, there was no need to discharge, no need to equalise, be much easier for racers - the end of our worries. Any of this sound familar?? How does that compare to where we are with NiMh now?? - in the space of 7 ish years (could be out on time).

So i'll hold my hands up to being very cynical!!!

I'd kind of quite like it if i was proved wrong, because that would mean tha tLiPo had solved all our problems and things were much easier.........we'll see i guess.
__________________
Matthew White
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-03-2008
ashleyb4's Avatar
ashleyb4 ashleyb4 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oswestry
Posts: 6,141
Default

where's the nicad option lol

I voted Nimh its not that im anti lipo i just havent tried it yet so i cant really comment.

A
__________________
Ashley Williams

I always thought by 2013 we would have flying cars, but we have got blankets with sleeves!

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-03-2008
Cockerill Cockerill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleyb4 View Post
where's the nicad option lol

I voted Nimh its not that im anti lipo i just havent tried it yet so i cant really comment.

A
But by voting you have commented Ash, surely if you have no experience of one option then undecided would be best?

Matt, I see where you are coming from and agree we were sold NiMH as the end of all our problems. Lipo are starting to become more common in big races in the US so we should see some Lipo development soon, and with big companies releasing Lipo's there will become a competitive market for them.

Will this development effect off-road? I believe that off-road cars can be so over-powered with Lipo packs that we don't need the latest and greatest packs. With the power we have now we are limting it with slipper clutches. Using Lipo will just give a more relaxed days racing IMO. Obviously not everyone will agree with me.
__________________
Yokomo - LMR
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-03-2008
glypo's Avatar
glypo glypo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 589
Default

LiPo has solved all of our problems. It's just we can't run LiPo to prove it. LiPo, and indeed the other Lithium technologies, are by no means new, I have been using them in aircraft for years now. And the RC aircraft market is factors times bigger then the car market, so RC cars running them won't push the technology along any faster. And we all have Lithium cells in our laptops and mobile phones.

£40 got me a balancing charger capable of up to 5 cell (18.5V) and that's the only cost people will incur. No discharging trays and all that rubbish you need with NiCad and NiMH. There is NO memory effect, no need to discharge them etc. NiMH is an odd technology, as we weren't lied to. You don't need to discharge NiMH, and the cell life remains the same. Similarly there is no memory effect in NiMH either. People interpreted this as you will still get maximum performance without cycling the cells, which is not the case as we all know. So just because people misunderstood the meaning behind the marketing of NiMH technology doesn't mean that LiPo will suddenly get worse with improvements in technology. In fact that's kind of an oxymoron.

So yes Matt, you are being too cynical lol! Embrace the LiPo goodness
__________________
Jason Moller
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-03-2008
ashleyb4's Avatar
ashleyb4 ashleyb4 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oswestry
Posts: 6,141
Default

well at the moment as i havent tried lipo i preffer nimhlol

A
__________________
Ashley Williams

I always thought by 2013 we would have flying cars, but we have got blankets with sleeves!

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-03-2008
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattW View Post
I've voted undecided, and i'll tell you why.

At the moment, LiPo hasn't been used in any "competative" race series, and you could argue that this isn't going to change in 2008 - because yes technically the touring car pro stock series is considdered "the support".

However, i have this view that because of this - there would seem to have been little/no development. Many People are using their Orion platignm packs (one of the first to be released i believe) and they are competative and similar in running to anything on the market. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Anyway, i believe that as soon as they are allowed in a "premier" class - we will see an upward development path the like of which we have never seen before.

Anyone remember the first NiMh cells?? We were told that NiMh was much more stable than NiCad, there was no need to discharge, no need to equalise, be much easier for racers - the end of our worries. Any of this sound familar?? How does that compare to where we are with NiMh now?? - in the space of 7 ish years (could be out on time).

So i'll hold my hands up to being very cynical!!!

I'd kind of quite like it if i was proved wrong, because that would mean tha tLiPo had solved all our problems and things were much easier.........we'll see i guess.
so the worksop serries is not competative?
we have world champs, euro champs, national A finalists running lipo along side nimh

dont forget lipo has been in planes for years, they have devloped packs ,, they are ultra competative one reason they are sorted now, cars put far less strain on them compared to planes

correct me if im wrong but the development on nimh was done by cars racers as a new technology? lipo is not new!

what is interesting is there are top level drivers voting for lipo, take a look at the results
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-03-2008
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_dono View Post
Not sure I understand this ? is he saying the "support" class is the pro-stock class ?

Anyway, that aside, Lipo all the way for me !

Chris
Super stock is a support class for the BRCA National (modified). And as for the class, the top guys will all be running brushless and Lipo, as there is an advantage. simple as.

regards to electric flight and the use of LiPo, I believe the BMFA has brought in specific regulations regarding the use of and charging of LiPo, they also see them as potentialy MORE hazardous due to the flamability of the cell over Nicd and NiMH.

I think LiPo will be the future, but there is so much non-lipo equipment out there, it is managing that issue that poses the biggest issue to me, not the current racer who has new chargers and esc's that are LiPo enabled. This is why I am still undecided on it, I like the idea, but the though of seeing them being used incorrectly kinda un-nerves me about it.
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-03-2008
Chrislong's Avatar
Chrislong Chrislong is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury
Posts: 4,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Col View Post
I didn't read it that way!
What I thought it meant was that TC modified is the main event and TC stock (or whatever it's called) is the support class - just like F1 being the main event and TOCA touring cars being support to them

p.s. voted lipo
Guys guys guys - go and read Charlies email I pasted - there is no mention of stock, super stock, he just mentions TC nationals and "support". Your all running away with what Chris Dono said without reading Charlies email and digesting it.. LOL..

Has anyone had a set of Lipo cells go bang? Lets hear about it. I keep hearing about the "Could happen" but no actuals.
__________________
JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares
www.jespares.com
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-03-2008
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Thanks Chris ...... that is the sort of thing I wanted to hear about ... positive and negative experiences .. real experiences.

I am personally very unsure about the LiPo revolution everybody is predicting, not if it will happen but if it should.

The one major upside of course is that if you want to run a perfectly balanced (side-side) 4wd car your going to have to run a car that can have a stick type Lipo down one side as the weight of a Lipo (from TrackPowers website) is almost identical to the electrical kit you would have on the other side of the chassis.

I can only think of two 4wds that can do that out of the box, Durga or ZX5-SP ......

What will the Atomic boys do? Can LiPos fit under the centre shaft on the Durango inspired cars?

All interesting stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-03-2008
Chris Doughty Chris Doughty is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,693
Default

Roger, I think the idea of allowing LiPo does not mean dis-allowing NiMh.

and the worksop series has proved that they can run side-by-side in off-road quite easily.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-03-2008
super__dan's Avatar
super__dan super__dan is offline
#1 ZX5 fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,482
Default

Actually with minimal modding, a stick pack fits an X5 too
__________________


Nortech is ACE!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-03-2008
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoughtyUK.net View Post
Roger, I think the idea of allowing LiPo does not mean dis-allowing NiMh.

and the worksop series has proved that they can run side-by-side in off-road quite easily.
I appreciate that Chris ....... just asking questions .....

Guess your answer would be to stay "Atomized" and run NiMhs then .... good choice IMHO ..
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-03-2008
AmiSMB AmiSMB is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bracklesham Bay, West Sussex
Posts: 1,375
Default

The only time where I have heard of Li-Poly explosive accidents is usually when the settings on the charger have not been set correctly i.e. Still in NiCad or NiMH mode, cell count incorrect, charging higher than 1C.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-03-2008
c0sie c0sie is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,294
Default

I think LiPo should be used where ever possible.
With regards to the LiPo's being used incorrectly point from above...how many times have you sat next to a racer in the pits who's been charging his IB4200's at 6A? That can be labelled as 'incorrect' use as much as someone attempting to charge a LiPo off a NiMh charger.
I think there are enough scare stories out there that anyone who actually buys a LiPo pack will know well enough to research the products and correct operating methods.
__________________
Previously:
BRCA Micro Section Chairman.
BRCA Micro National Champion.

Currently:
JQ fan.
Bellend.

Forums are better than Facebook groups
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-03-2008
dancoog's Avatar
dancoog dancoog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
Default

Lipos are becoming the norm in US racing and apear to be a positive change.
As a racer returning from 10 years off I can say the outlay for 4+packs of cells versus 1 - 2 packs of Lips is a no brains call.

When you take into account the cost of a novak or much more discharge tray for cells the price has just hit the roof!!

given the choice right now I would take up Lipo and laugh at the fact that I haven't just spent £400 not counting my top level charger..

If you have two packs strapped into two cars (2wd and 4wd) you could even run two classes in the same day at a club race. (they do in the US)

If you think about that it just makes sense!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-03-2008
Cockerill Cockerill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 843
Default

Regarding them been dangerous. The rules Roar have enforced for the packs to pass there tests are pretty strict as far as I can tell, this includes over-charging them to see what happens and a drop test. With these tests in place only packs that will be legal will be the safer ones. Most have seen what happens when a NiMH is over-charged and its not particularly safe

Regarding the NiMH/Lipo performance debate, I cannot honeslty see a performance disadvantage to running NiMH as I feel any off-road car can be over-powered as it is, unless you are currently running the quickest motors you can buy and still wnat more power you have no reason to complain on this front. Therefore cars that can only run NiMH will not have a disadvantage and a new car can be properly developed to allow the use of Lipo or both cells.
__________________
Yokomo - LMR
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-03-2008
danDanEFC's Avatar
danDanEFC danDanEFC is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Crosby, Merseyside
Posts: 1,022
Send a message via MSN to danDanEFC
Default

I voted Lipo

I only started racing last year and I have moved from the old borrowed nicd/nimh cells I was using and upgraded to Lipo.

It is much easier for me to understand Lipo than it was for me to get my head round nimh, balancing, matching and discharging.

I will run in the regionals and I am happy not to score any points, probably wouldnt get a F4 anyway :-).

I also understand it must be differcult for people, who are more serious racers than me, who have invetsed in cells, chargers and dischargers for Nimh to spend more money on 'the next big thing'
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-03-2008
chris_dono chris_dono is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattW View Post
I've voted undecided, and i'll tell you why.

At the moment, LiPo hasn't been used in any "competative" race series, and you could argue that this isn't going to change in 2008 - because yes technically the touring car pro stock series is considdered "the support".
the STCC series is allowing Lipo with Mod motors for touring cars this year, will be interesting to see how much support there is for that against the other series that are being run.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-03-2008
chris_dono chris_dono is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrislong View Post
Guys guys guys - go and read Charlies email I pasted - there is no mention of stock, super stock, he just mentions TC nationals and "support". Your all running away with what Chris Dono said without reading Charlies email and digesting it.. LOL..

Has anyone had a set of Lipo cells go bang? Lets hear about it. I keep hearing about the "Could happen" but no actuals.
Seems i created a stir here

I simply wanted to know if the "support" class that was being referred to was indeed the super stock class that's new for this year

As for cells going bang...
I've personally seen three sets of NimH go in the past year, and heard of another 5 or so.
I've heard on one set of lipo cells that went on fire because a NimH set of cells went bang inside a battery box where the Lipo was, not because of any other reason.

running a single lipo pack in my TC for almost a year, I've had no issues with it at all, a couple of times it's even come out of the car as the battery tape broke and it was dragged along the ground for a bit before I realised.

I can't recommend Lipo enough to people !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com