Quote:
Originally Posted by RudeTony
Dave,
I have read your post twice and taken that deap breath because with all the jokes aside you talk some logic.
You then please answer why should Vega HAVE to justify themselves for something they did not start.
Why should many manufacturers suffer because of this comment.
Why in fact should the BRCA not answer the question that one of their officials posted.
Why should in fact many drivers be unsure whether to buy or not based on that comment.
And lastly but certainly not least why shouldn't Graham just come on here and say it himself.
If you can aswer all of the above then I will not post on this thead again.
Now Dave, please take a minute and a deap breath before you answer the above.  Also think outside the box and the people that read all this and so on. I repeat over and over again, i have nothing against Graham but the more he doesn't come on here and tell us what's what and why and the more the silence goes on, the worse people think and that includes me!
I actually now think it's a BRCA problem and not a Graham problem - their offcial - they should sort this out
|
tony
im pretty sure if somone or a brca official came on here and said rude bits weights are not brass there anodised coke tins, YOU would be on here saying it was bollox as the manufacture, you would not wait for manchester universitys metalist bofin to post for you.
ive read all this and agree with dave, all vega need to do is post yes the body fits the brca rules...................simples