Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > I Made This !

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2012
col1nw3bb col1nw3bb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 45
Default Yet another Mid Engine XXX Buggy

Hey guys, im new on here. Been out of the RC loop for about 10yrs, recently dragged my old stuff out and am trying to get back up to speed. So i have a XXX BK2 and i normal XXX.

After reading on here about the benefits of mid motor conversions i decided to give it a go on the normal XXX. So far ive flipped the trans and trimmed the chassis. Also ive stiffend the chassis with some metal reinforcing bars and plastic weld (pro stuff thats used to hold car bumpers together).

Ok will get pics up soon but now its question time, excuse the crappy diagrams (and the fact its the wrong side) best google and my paint skills could do. Which one of the following laylouts would you say is best? The advantage to stick packs is my other XXX uses them, but then my rally weapon uses saddle.... I cant see a major difference in weight distribution from either design either...





Cheers
Colin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2012
Alan Reeves's Avatar
Alan Reeves Alan Reeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hazel Grove, Stockport
Posts: 450
Default

Here is a good thread
http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71798
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2012
col1nw3bb col1nw3bb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 45
Default

Cheers i have seen that one before. Have also read that the mid converted cars have a tendancy to nose dive more, so i didnt want to keep the original battery layout, in order to minimise weight over the front wheels.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2012
peetbee's Avatar
peetbee peetbee is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: www.caldicotrcracers.co.uk
Posts: 4,013
Default

Neither layout!
Put the esc & rx where you have them in picture 2, but use the saddle layout as per picture 1, except move them to the centreline of the chassis
And then you have a CR2!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2012
col1nw3bb col1nw3bb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 45
Default

Do you mean like this?

If so can you explain the benefit of this design over either of the other two for me? Like i said ive been outta the game a while and alots changed, so i dont just want an answer i want to understand the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2012
peetbee's Avatar
peetbee peetbee is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: www.caldicotrcracers.co.uk
Posts: 4,013
Default

I'm not in anyway technical, but I'll try!
I believe it's all about keeping the weight central to reduce roll whilst keeping it as close the rear as possible (but I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong!)

The way you have it shown there is the same as in the Atomic Carbon CR2 & S2, the Centro, the X6 and the new Cougar SV2 - so there must be something good about it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com