Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > I Made This !

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2007
BloodClod BloodClod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 120
Default Bored of mid motor 2wds yet?

The "I made this" part of Oople is one of my favourite forums - some awesome projects here. I saw the different mid motor 2wd buggies and thought they were really unique and interesting. As I never really fancied how my XXX handled I decided to take it out of storage and build a mid motor buggy out of it.

... yes yes, another one...

Started by hacking up the chassis and after some measurements the backbone of the chassis was designed and cut from aluminum and G10



The rear brace was designed to be narrow so as to provide some rigidity but yet allow a saddle pack configuration...

The battery hold-downs were fabricated next and this is how the setup looked.



Actually the hole where the antennae tube holder is mounted was actually designed as a spot for an additional stand off to increase chassis rigidity but after bolting everything up as in the pic I found the chassis didn't really have too much flex (using the sophisticated "hand-twist" test)

If you excuse the unsightly wiring, here's some simple test gear I put in there. I figure if I like the performance I'll swap it out for some higher spec gear.



Here's a pic with the ugly hacked up cover (I really don't like the color but the whole car was bought used)



Comments would be most welcome.

I'd love to hear from other mid motor 2wd drivers what your experiences are with the handling of these cars and what setup changes you've made.

Cheers,

BC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2007
Dunc's Avatar
Dunc Dunc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 549
Default

I'm afraid I've no experience with mid-motor 2wd buggies (building or driving); I just wanted to say how impressed I am by your workmanship - great job!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2007
annie_himself annie_himself is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baton Rouge, La, USA
Posts: 152
Send a message via AIM to annie_himself
Default

I've wanted to do that to my BK1, if I get a CR I will do it to match my mid-motor truck.

Great craftsmanship, do you have a full chassis shot with no body?
__________________
Sponsors:
Team Kassanova
www.TeamKassanova.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2007
BloodClod BloodClod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 120
Default

Thanks for the kind comments.

Had the opportunity to run this buggy over the weekend. First time out the car performed very poorly - it was erratic at best. I suspected that the poor performance was caused by unsuitable rear tires and a rear diff that needed a rebuild.

Swapped out the tires for some bowties and rebuilt the diff for the next run. Performance was much improved. After some spring tuning the car started to find its groove slowly... actually keeping up with some of the 1/8s going around the track. It lost out on the straights due to the stock class motor but through the turns it was doing quite well.

It drives very different from a standard 2wd through. On power it seems to understeer but off power the car brings its rear around quite well. I had to watch the throttle at lower speeds as the rear had a tendency to come loose if I pinned the throttle too hard. At higher speeds though, it seemed to be a lot more stable around the track.

I was browsing the X-6 forums and was glad to read the experiences of the X-6 drivers. Although I'm sure my car performs nowhere near the level of the X-factory buggy, the descriptions of their buggy driving characteristics seemed similar to mine.

What are the other mid motor guys experiencing?

More tuning to do to try to get more steering on power... I probably need to fashion a way to adjust roll-center in the rear.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-09-2007
Welshy40's Avatar
Welshy40 Welshy40 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: .
Posts: 4,773
Default

Well thought out and made. That is the correct way to do it and now as it is a prototype you can now develop it more via testing. Well done and keep us posted with the new ideas that you put into it.

I doubt youd remember but Tekin many years ago when Eustace Moore was racing his 4wd RC10 (Mr MIP by the way) a chassis specifically for the RC10 was brought out with the gearbox swopped around and mid mounted motor, almost like yours and the X series cars. Its not a new design but still an interesting one.

Do you reckon youd be up for putting the cells in the original position rather than side by side and put in a smaller servo so you would have room then the car to do it and that should handle a lot better and then you should have less body roll. Well its an idea that you may want to try. Still good work.
__________________
www.kamtec.co.uk
www.fibre-lyte.co.uk
answer-rc.com/uk/en/
Answer UK team driver
Designer of the Lazer ZX/ZXR carbon fibre tub chassis
Designer of the Lazer ZXRS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-09-2007
xx4-nutter xx4-nutter is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: hull
Posts: 1,253
Send a message via MSN to xx4-nutter
Default

Cracking job there mate, after driving an X-6 mid motor 2wd car ill never drive anouther " normal " 2wd buggy again, i see them as a disadvantage now

Garry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-09-2007
BloodClod BloodClod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshy40 View Post
Well thought out and made. That is the correct way to do it and now as it is a prototype you can now develop it more via testing. Well done and keep us posted with the new ideas that you put into it.

I doubt youd remember but Tekin many years ago when Eustace Moore was racing his 4wd RC10 (Mr MIP by the way) a chassis specifically for the RC10 was brought out with the gearbox swopped around and mid mounted motor, almost like yours and the X series cars. Its not a new design but still an interesting one.

Do you reckon youd be up for putting the cells in the original position rather than side by side and put in a smaller servo so you would have room then the car to do it and that should handle a lot better and then you should have less body roll. Well its an idea that you may want to try. Still good work.
Thanks for the comments.

I did think of the layout you mentioned but I went with the saddle pack configuration as I still wanted to bias the weight distribution toward the rear of the car. Using a stick pack that occupies the space of the steering servo would move the weight a little further forward (although it would center the weight down the centerline of the car a lot more).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-09-2007
Richard Lowe Richard Lowe is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,398
Default

Very nicely done, puts my effort to shame

Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshy40 View Post
Do you reckon youd be up for putting the cells in the original position rather than side by side ... and then you should have less body roll..
Doesn't work like that
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-04-2009
FERRETTI's Avatar
FERRETTI FERRETTI is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North East England
Posts: 270
Default

I admire anyone with the talent and vision to attempt projects of this nature, good on you BloodClod I hope you get it dialled

Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshy40 View Post
I doubt youd remember but Tekin many years ago when Eustace Moore was racing his 4wd RC10 (Mr MIP by the way) a chassis specifically for the RC10 was brought out with the gearbox swopped around and mid mounted motor, almost like yours and the X series cars. Its not a new design but still an interesting one.
Here's a link to my shelfer Tekin for reference http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom_m...64658&id=18028 I'm putting a runner one together to race at Jarrow (back end of the year) so I'm also interested in the handling characteristics of such mid motored 2WDs
__________________
If you're living within your means you don't have enough imagination.

Here's my TC showroom
http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom.asp?id=18028
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-04-2009
losixxxcr losixxxcr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Default

i was doing the same and love the aluminum back bone idea.. but could you make 2 and mill the curve of the front side to the curve of the battery and still have the weight far enought back.. and motor movement for gearing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com