|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Northy
Seen as you are "the meat" when it comes to fluid dynamics there is one thing i have been thinking about, now if we can make out fluid flow through the pistons in a laminar flow rather than turbulent then surely they will work more efficiently. I have thought also that if we tapered the holes slightly (but not open the holes any wider, Hard to do i know) then i think this would work to a point? ![]() I dont know if this has been tried before or maybe i am just talking crap, what are your thoughts or findings? Lee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Xray already have tapered pistons for their 1:8 rallycross buggy
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There was me thinking i was clever
![]() What were the findings then? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
turbulant flow is a tuning aid.
its not a matter of making them work more 'efficiently' turbulant flow is good to help 'soft' damping pack up when landing a big jump. small holes + light oil work well on tracks with big jumps. big holes heavy oil work well on 'rippled' tracks |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok cheers chris,
So there is no point in tapering a hole? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you think it would give you what you wanted...
personally, I can reduce pack (or turbulant flow) enough using heavier oils and bigger holes for what I need. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|