Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > JConcepts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-07-2009
cmgreen's Avatar
cmgreen cmgreen is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gods Country-Tyne & Wear
Posts: 1,114
Default Bj4 WE

Has any one thought of a tub chassis for the bj4 we? I got some carbon bits made from fibre-lyte and while talking to steve there, he said he can still make them but would be a good idea to have 6-7 people interested.

First things first, would a tub chassis make the car any better?

Wots people's thoughts?
__________________
'There are two choices in life-Take it or leave it !'

Yokomo - Nemoracing
Sb Designs
http://www.fairfueluk.com/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-07-2009
colmo's Avatar
colmo colmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fermanagh, N. Ireland
Posts: 842
Send a message via MSN to colmo Send a message via Skype™ to colmo
Default

The reason to go for a tub chassis is to eliminate the need for a top deck. I'm thinking of the Predator here.

The problem would be that you'd need to leave half the top deck in place to provide some stability to the central bulkhead, rather defeating the purpose.

This idea would work better on the original BJ4, but there aren't many of those left, and I already have plenty of chassis for mine
__________________


Photos:
Oople Invernational 2010 - Sodden Sunday
Muchmore N. Irish GP 2010 (Touring cars)
BADMCC 1/8th Nitro buggies

Current cars:
X6^2 | JC BJ4WE | TM E4 & E4JS | HPI E-Firestorm | Losi Crawler | + many F1s, super crawlers, scalers, drifters in the works...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-07-2009
cmgreen's Avatar
cmgreen cmgreen is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gods Country-Tyne & Wear
Posts: 1,114
Default

But wouldnt a tub chassis make the bj4 we better, less flex..........

Would like to here other people opinions.
__________________
'There are two choices in life-Take it or leave it !'

Yokomo - Nemoracing
Sb Designs
http://www.fairfueluk.com/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-07-2009
peetbee's Avatar
peetbee peetbee is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: www.caldicotrcracers.co.uk
Posts: 4,013
Default

Wouldn't you end up with something similar to the Atomic Carbon S4 if you did this?
I'm pretty sure you still need some bracing of the front and rear gearboxes due to the chassis sides needing to be done away with to allow the wishbones to attach!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-07-2009
colmo's Avatar
colmo colmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fermanagh, N. Ireland
Posts: 842
Send a message via MSN to colmo Send a message via Skype™ to colmo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmgreen View Post
But wouldnt a tub chassis make the bj4 we better, less flex..........
I've noticed that a number of hop-ups for 4wd buggies are intended to increase flex - off the top of my head, Diggity Designs do a slim top deck for the B44, and Team Azurashi do thin topdecks for the 501X - something that has appeared in the 511X too.

Considering the venue I run mine at (wood floor = nearly zero traction), flex would be my friend

I suppose the trick is to have an easy means of stiffening or softening the chassis dependant on the surface, such as the XRay touring cars do.
__________________


Photos:
Oople Invernational 2010 - Sodden Sunday
Muchmore N. Irish GP 2010 (Touring cars)
BADMCC 1/8th Nitro buggies

Current cars:
X6^2 | JC BJ4WE | TM E4 & E4JS | HPI E-Firestorm | Losi Crawler | + many F1s, super crawlers, scalers, drifters in the works...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com