Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > 1/10th OFF ROAD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-09-2013
Chris Elworthy's Avatar
Chris Elworthy Chris Elworthy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bolton
Posts: 707
Default Curious: best 2wd in low grip?

As the title suggests I'm just wondering what people feel is the best current 2wd on wet/low grip astro or wet/worn grass tracks?

I've noticed the current trend with new chassis being very much designed with high grip conditions in mind at the expense of rear grip, the Rb6 (that I run) and the Team C TM2 are particular examples.

From my knowledge the X-Factory X-6 seems to generate good grip when it gets loose and slippy but are there any others?

What is your opinion on the subject from your experience of car's on wet/slippy astro in particular.


Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-09-2013
Dudders's Avatar
Dudders Dudders is offline
SHRCCC Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,317
Default

Any vega IMHO.
__________________
Vega RB6 - Orion - Apex Models - JE Models - Cable ties
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-09-2013
neallewis's Avatar
neallewis neallewis is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 3,368
Default

My Yokomo BMAX 2 MR is fantastic in low grip slippy rubber and polished gym floor tracks, best car for it i think. It feels the similar, and generates as much rear grip as the X6^2, and I prefer it driving to the B4.X rear motor as it carries much more corner speed, rather than having to break and turn on B4.

It's also fantastic, along with X6 and centro, at the Batley style track of low grip weathered astro, grass, damp, etc.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Team Yokomo - YZ-2CAL3 | YZ-2DTM3 | YZ-4SF2 | YZ-2T | YZ-2DTM Worlds | YZ-2DTM x2 | YRX-12 x2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10electric | Batley Buggy Club | YORCC | RHR | MB Models
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-09-2013
jaank jaank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudders View Post
Any vega IMHO.
I can't see how MM car would work good on low-grip surfaces.
Slippery astro doesn't count as low-grip.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-09-2013
dicky14's Avatar
dicky14 dicky14 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: sutton in ashfield
Posts: 348
Default

TM2 works on worn grass if you take the right lines. had no problems at our last regional
__________________
Tm2, LRP, Sanwa, SMD, Schumacher KC, L1, PBM Racing
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-09-2013
neallewis's Avatar
neallewis neallewis is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaank View Post
I can't see how MM car would work good on low-grip surfaces.
Slippery astro doesn't count as low-grip.
You've never run at Batley then. much lower grip than regular astro that's wet.

I was also talking polished wooden gym (Yorcc) or rubber floors (Cully or Batley indoors). Very much low grip.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Team Yokomo - YZ-2CAL3 | YZ-2DTM3 | YZ-4SF2 | YZ-2T | YZ-2DTM Worlds | YZ-2DTM x2 | YRX-12 x2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10electric | Batley Buggy Club | YORCC | RHR | MB Models
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-09-2013
JohnM's Avatar
JohnM JohnM is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 1,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaank View Post
I can't see how MM car would work good on low-grip surfaces.
Slippery astro doesn't count as low-grip.
The X-6's all work well on low grip tracks, don't forget they were designed in the States on dirt tracks

Pretty sure Ellis was the only person to get a mid car in the Euro A final on dirt a few years back when he drove for X-Factory.
__________________
Model Junction, Boughton Raceway.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-09-2013
dpackster1980 dpackster1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jarrow
Posts: 987
Default

B- Max2MR is tremendous, it generates loads of traction.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-09-2013
Al3xis007 Al3xis007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: in a house
Posts: 340
Default

Ones with new rear tyres...
__________________
Schumacher Racing

Compositekit.co.uk
Trishbits
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-09-2013
gazhillAE gazhillAE is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al3xis007 View Post
Ones with new rear tyres...
And someone who can change a setup !
__________________
Gareth Hill
Schumacher - Sanwa - LRP - Mb models
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-09-2013
Origineelreclamebord's Avatar
Origineelreclamebord Origineelreclamebord is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaank View Post
I can't see how MM car would work good on low-grip surfaces.
Slippery astro doesn't count as low-grip.
Think again Mid-motor can be absolutely killer on low bite! To be honest I think a Vega might not be the finest example because I think a more flexible chassis will offer better performance on low bite, but I haven't tried it. However, there are some cars I experienced/drove myself and are very nice!

X-6 (Sq): By far the easiest RWD I've ever driven! It has tons of rear grip (even on dusty, bumpy clay) and the car feels very forgiving. Anyone who can't get around on dirt should try one of these cars - there are tons of setups for this car on low bite so it shouldn't be hard getting it right.

TLR22/22 2.0: It's not without reason the Junior Euros Champion used his TLR22 in mid-motor configuration - the rear-motor can be quicker, but according to him it doesn't feel comfortable, and the times are not as consistent as a mid-motor. The setups are on PetitRC (Example, Click): No strange tricks with weights (only weight under the shorty), just a really well thought out setup.

I tried both his 22 and 22 2.0 - the 22 was nice, the 22 2.0 was nothing short of amazing! Very smooth on all fronts, good amount of steering, the rear end slides, but so little that you don't need to countersteer, and lastly: it begs to be pushed and doesn't bite back! It feels much more nimble than an X-6 Sq, but I do want to add the 22 seems to require a much more specific setup to work that well.

DEX210: A fellow club member of mine didn't get the RM DEX210 to work for him in the first few months of racing, so he stuck with mid-motor. I tried his car and it seemed a litle edgy on the rear when you pushed it - other than that it was very solid!

After driving his car I decided to go down the same route. The car needs some small mods/upgrades. For example, the rear droop needs to be increased to the limit of what the shock can give you. Also, I decided to run a shorty pack and Cream battery stopper in the rear of the car. I'm still running too stiff a damper setup so it's lacking a bit of rear grip currently, yet I don't find my car that edgy (I run shorter front links than him, it might be down to that). Once I soften the setup on the car it shouldn't be far off from the other two mid-motors I just mentioned.

My Conclusion: I'm not implying any of these cars is best - it's down to setup and preference of driving style. However, I do want to point out mid-motor can be an excellent choice on low bite, and I chose a mid-motor over a rear-motor because:

- I found the MM is more gentle and will warn you when you tend to step over the line. It will feel sort of comfortable even when the setup is not optimal (Which also makes it harder to spot where you can find the edge in your setup).
- I found RM has more of a temper and you don't know when it's going to fight you. Also, the car can feel pretty dreadful to drive when the setup is not there yet (Which also should make it easier to spot what setup changes will make the car feel better and quicker).
__________________


3D Printing Upgrade Parts - FF210 Buggy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-09-2013
Neil Skull's Avatar
Neil Skull Neil Skull is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,047
Default Its Wet and loose!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Elworthy View Post
As the title suggests I'm just wondering what people feel is the best current 2wd on wet/low grip astro or wet/worn grass tracks?

I've noticed the current trend with new chassis being very much designed with high grip conditions in mind at the expense of rear grip, the Rb6 (that I run) and the Team C TM2 are particular examples.

From my knowledge the X-Factory X-6 seems to generate good grip when it gets loose and slippy but are there any others?

What is your opinion on the subject from your experience of car's on wet/slippy astro in particular.


Chris
Chris The RB6 was mostly designed On low grip dirt tracks in rear motor. The mid motor option is great for UK and the shorty layout means you can shove the battery right back when grip is down or right up front when its up. The TM2 and DB1/2 are specifically for the High Grip! as well as the other mid motor conversions like the Centro.

I think any car that can get the weight at the back when grip gets low will work fine if you find your self in that situation.
__________________


Kyosho UK

www.kyoshoeurope.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-09-2013
racingdwarf's Avatar
racingdwarf racingdwarf is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norfik
Posts: 2,910
Default

I drove my B4 then a vega back to back on our very low grip dirt track, both cars had the same tyres and I had spent a fair amount of time with many setups on the B4, The vega was far far better, but I also ran a very modified mad monkey at the time, and that was also better than the B4. I sold both for a vega TBH I never could work out why everyone says rear motor is so good in low grip we also tried our rear motored 22, that was shocking!

I ran the B4 on grass for 5years before that so it's not like I didn't know the car
__________________
Dave

www.norfolkbuggyclub.moonfruit.com

kyosho optima,Bosscat,Boomerang,,RB5 Vega,RB7,,RC12 5.2, TLR22-4,MP9,HB807T
Flask of tea & a rollup
Anglia model centre & CT Models
http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28117
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com