Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Tamiya

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2011
kidcongo kidcongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 64
Default Lower front arms - what's the diff between them?

Can anyone explain the difference between these three front arms that fit my TRF buggy? I understand one is hard, one soft, but what is the third? Which is least likely to break?

51275 Lower Arm
51283 High Traction soft lower arm
51141 High Traction lower arm

They are all listed here at the bottom of page 4 from the TRF502X:
http://www.jtmodels.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2011
mattybucks mattybucks is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,800
Default

The 51275 are the strongest, I use them on my 511. If you do happen to break one you usually still manage to finish the run.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2011
kidcongo kidcongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 64
Default

Thanks for the advice. Much difference in handling with them?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2011
mattybucks mattybucks is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,800
Default

Lee uses them so I would say the handling difference is minimal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2011
bzb's Avatar
bzb bzb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 496
Default

more grip with the soft ones
__________________

BZB: The shortest name in rc..

BZB "i just can't, i just can't, i just can't control my feet" 2012 tour!!:

BZB4Holland

BZB4Belgium
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2011
Jamie.T's Avatar
Jamie.T Jamie.T is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Crosshands, SW Wales
Posts: 1,421
Default

We list 3 different types of front arms, a brief explanation of each:

1. 54141 is the high traction stiffer type front arm which doesn't flex and offers good grip, but is more prone to breakage when hit.

2. 54283 is a softer type which does allow a lot more flex and when it does break doesn't shatter but instead cracks.

3. 51275 is a medium grade arm but has 20-30% more material and is visibly thicker to look at. This is a good strong front lower arm that offers a compromise of the 2 above.

Hope this helps you in choosing a suitable part.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2011
craigosh's Avatar
craigosh craigosh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: liverpool
Posts: 445
Send a message via MSN to craigosh
Default

Just to confuse matters a little more there is also

51311 - DB01 Original front arm

These are a little softer than 51275 but same amount of material
I've broken them, but they only ever go a bit at the inner hinge-pin.
Never snapped one in half and usually been able to finish a run!

I cant tell any difference in handling but usually a tad cheaper to buy.
__________________
Southport P.R.O. / Photographer of semi-naked girls
www.srcc.co.uk - www.craigmagee.co.uk
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com