Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > KYOSHO

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2010
discostu's Avatar
discostu discostu is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Whitstable
Posts: 1,571
Default fs-fs2 diffrences

hi every one

just want to clarify the diffrences between the fs and fs2 as far as i can tell the body the rear shock springs the slipper clutch and am i corrrect in thinking the chassis is the same except without battery slots.

i appologise if this has been asked before muchly appreciate it

stu
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2010
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

The main differences are;

chassis moulded with closed battery slots
slipper clutch optional locking pin included
springs
body
some slightly tweeked hardware

but the main differences in terms of performance are

rear wishbones
rear hubs
rear driveshaft dogbones
rear driveshaft axles
optional LAW36/37 aluminium rear hinge pin hangers (with toe adjustment) in the box (I think .. best check with Neil first)


I am considering getting a brand new FS2 to replace my much used but still brilliant FS as the cost of the rear end components and body more than justify the additional cost over an FS kit and upgrade. Yes I know I have most of the bits but they are as well loved as the rest of the car.

Still not bad, not a single piece of drivetrain hardware changed due to wear in 2 years of running her ... like to see many other 4wd cars do that
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2010
discostu's Avatar
discostu discostu is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Whitstable
Posts: 1,571
Default

hi

so what is differnt between the fs rear arms hubs and driveshafts and the fs2.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2010
DaSloth's Avatar
DaSloth DaSloth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 602
Default

you also get given longer ball joints to use for the front steering knuckles so you get more bump steer.
__________________
www.insidelineracing.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2010
mikeyscott's Avatar
mikeyscott mikeyscott is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 7,223
Default

Perhaps I should have just got a FS2 to start with
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2010
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

To be clear ......

The FS is a VERY good car, my own car is still running to FS spec.

The FS2 was put together to give more rotation mid corner which suits certain people / tracks better.

If you have an FS in good order, can find a clean second hand FS (like your Mikey) or prefer a car with a more locked in rear end then stick with the FS ... you can always upgrade later if that is what you feel is best for you.

If you have to have the latest spec, like a car that rotates more mid corner or find the added bling and new body a must have then FS2 it is.

The reason I will be going FS2 is that I have all the FS bits to convert it back if I wanted to and I like to have the latest greatest.

Biggest bonus to a new FS2 driver though is the inclusion of the LAW36/37 as they are a few quid to buy separately but really worth every penny!

In summary get either car and you won't be disappointed ... if you want more specifically tailored info then post up with what you currently drive and how you like a car to feel and I will do my best to advise the optimum starting point for you personally.

Hope that helps.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-10-2010
sly's Avatar
sly sly is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: On earth somewhere
Posts: 1,110
Default

Chassis Length?

Is the FS chassis length the same as the FS2, but just the cell holes filled in?
Cheers.
__________________
Trader feedback:-http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78095

It was once said to me, if you light the blue touch paper you need to stand well back[/CENTER]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-10-2010
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Yes, a couple of subtle changes (I believe to improve impact strength) and the cell holes filled in otherwise the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com