Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > General Race Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16-05-2007
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Lee-Mag
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: More north than Northy!!
Posts: 6,943
Default Fluid Guru?

Northy

Seen as you are "the meat" when it comes to fluid dynamics there is one thing i have been thinking about, now if we can make out fluid flow through the pistons in a laminar flow rather than turbulent then surely they will work more efficiently. I have thought also that if we tapered the holes slightly (but not open the holes any wider, Hard to do i know) then i think this would work to a point?

I dont know if this has been tried before or maybe i am just talking crap, what are your thoughts or findings?

Lee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-05-2007
MattADH MattADH is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,038
Default

Xray already have tapered pistons for their 1:8 rallycross buggy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-05-2007
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Lee-Mag
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: More north than Northy!!
Posts: 6,943
Default

There was me thinking i was clever


What were the findings then?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-05-2007
Chris Doughty Chris Doughty is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,693
Default

turbulant flow is a tuning aid.

its not a matter of making them work more 'efficiently' turbulant flow is good to help 'soft' damping pack up when landing a big jump.

small holes + light oil work well on tracks with big jumps.

big holes heavy oil work well on 'rippled' tracks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-05-2007
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Lee-Mag
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: More north than Northy!!
Posts: 6,943
Default

Ok cheers chris,

So there is no point in tapering a hole?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-05-2007
Chris Doughty Chris Doughty is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,693
Default

if you think it would give you what you wanted...

personally, I can reduce pack (or turbulant flow) enough using heavier oils and bigger holes for what I need.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-05-2007
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Lee-Mag
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: More north than Northy!!
Posts: 6,943
Default

I understand chris,

I imagine if the car has extra weight then the shocks would "pack" easier maybe this would be the reason why Xray use them on the 1/8th cars?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-05-2007
elvo's Avatar
elvo elvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 913
Default

A taper on one side gives asymmetric damping. (lighter on rebound, or vice versa) Which feels funny when used on the front end of a 2WD.
On the rear, light bump and heavy rebound damping keeps the rear end planted, but makes it more difficult to get jumps right.

After a bazillion experiments, I'm still not sure whether it's a good thing to have tapered or chamfered holes or not. All I know is that it's NOT good to mix them with normal, straight holes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-05-2007
Chrislong's Avatar
Chrislong Chrislong is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury
Posts: 4,196
Default

How about holes drilled at 45 degree's, so making the oil swirl in the shock as the piston moves through the oil?

Personally, im happy with less complications and im comfortable with the convension shocks - until something is found which clearly thrashes it ofcause.

Chris
__________________
JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares JESpares
www.jespares.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com