Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > General Race Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-12-2009
mattlynch's Avatar
mattlynch mattlynch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edinburgh Scotland
Posts: 76
Default brca weight limits

just a thought, with everyone going over to li-po / brushless set ups would it be of advantage if the brca reduced weight limits? i think the advantage of doing so could be good, less weight = less mass= less breakage longer run times and lower costs, but would you miss the ability to balance your car with the extra weight that is currently being piled on as balast, opinions and thoughts please.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-12-2009
bedsrcmcc's Avatar
bedsrcmcc bedsrcmcc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 498
Default

I know that the 1:10th Touring Cars are being reduced in 2010 to 1350g, so I guess the same could be for off-roaders too, though not sure what the weight is.

Interesting thing is, I have a new Xray T3 designed for LiPo but I still can't even get down to that weight once the car is balanced. My weight at present is 1385g so I guess it depends on the equipment you buy. Some LiPo packs are lighter than others.

Personally I thought the drop to 1350g was too far, but I guess in time I'll find ways to get closer to that weight...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-12-2009
bigred5765's Avatar
bigred5765 bigred5765 is offline
Lion-O - King of the Thundercats
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chorley
Posts: 8,474
Send a message via MSN to bigred5765 Send a message via Skype™ to bigred5765
Default

i doubt it would help as most people are adding weight and lots of it
__________________
Mattys the driver,my names carl
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-12-2009
coolcars782's Avatar
coolcars782 coolcars782 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South - West
Posts: 972
Default

And remember most brushless systems are heavier than there equivlent brush system
__________________
~Carl Davis

~Tiverton Radio Control Car Club-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-12-2009
RogerM's Avatar
RogerM RogerM is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The middle of off-road nowhere ----- Cheltenham
Posts: 4,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred5765 View Post
i doubt it would help as most people are adding weight and lots of it
Most back to NiMh weight ... tried my RB5 with LiPos and no weight @ PDA tonight, was scary to drive ... loading it with lead before next week, or maybe put some proper batteries back in her!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-12-2009
Kopite's Avatar
Kopite Kopite is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellesmere Port
Posts: 1,641
Default

Maybe off-road could comply to a weight range?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-12-2009
Mad-Wolfie's Avatar
Mad-Wolfie Mad-Wolfie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Stoke on Trent (UK)
Posts: 308
Default

to be fair it's a minimum weight limit.. there isn't a maximum, so gone are the days of a LiPo with tons of lead weight stuck on the side, which i imagine would be a safety risk.

Even on the old limit of 1500g with regular cells (as in heavy), i've had to add about 70g of weight to the cars i race to reach the minimum limit. The big problem now though i think with the weight removed will be the balancing, all the weight will be on the electrics side of the car, the battery side will be very light & will still need a few weights to even out the weight distribution even though the cars will be "legal" without adding any weight.

I must say i've never been a fan of the excessive weight limits & frankly can't see the point as they hinder performance, i mean the manufacturers must spend a fortune of R&D money on improving their cars & employ skilled technicians with physics degree's to work on a part of the chassis that will be making it stronger, improve the performance of the car & in the process shaving off a few grams here & there - only for some regulator to come along & slap a weight limit on the regulations so that means all the hard work of the highly qualified & skilled technicians has gone up the wall thanks to a bright idea by someone who quite frankly hasn't a clue! Yes, impose weight limits as ballast to slow down the top drivers to make the competition tighter, but as a technical point it's a step backwards in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-12-2009
bedsrcmcc's Avatar
bedsrcmcc bedsrcmcc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad-Wolfie View Post
to be fair it's a minimum weight limit.. there isn't a maximum, so gone are the days of a LiPo with tons of lead weight stuck on the side, which i imagine would be a safety risk.

Even on the old limit of 1500g with regular cells (as in heavy), i've had to add about 70g of weight to the cars i race to reach the minimum limit. The big problem now though i think with the weight removed will be the balancing, all the weight will be on the electrics side of the car, the battery side will be very light & will still need a few weights to even out the weight distribution even though the cars will be "legal" without adding any weight.

I must say i've never been a fan of the excessive weight limits & frankly can't see the point as they hinder performance, i mean the manufacturers must spend a fortune of R&D money on improving their cars & employ skilled technicians with physics degree's to work on a part of the chassis that will be making it stronger, improve the performance of the car & in the process shaving off a few grams here & there - only for some regulator to come along & slap a weight limit on the regulations so that means all the hard work of the highly qualified & skilled technicians has gone up the wall thanks to a bright idea by someone who quite frankly hasn't a clue! Yes, impose weight limits as ballast to slow down the top drivers to make the competition tighter, but as a technical point it's a step backwards in my opinion.
As I said about my Xray T3, it's built for LiPo racing but just to balance it I still need to add weight!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-12-2009
Col's Avatar
Col Col is offline
Awesome Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: York
Posts: 4,571
Send a message via AIM to Col
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad-Wolfie View Post
to be fair it's a minimum weight limit.. there isn't a maximum, so gone are the days of a LiPo with tons of lead weight stuck on the side, which i imagine would be a safety risk.

Even on the old limit of 1500g with regular cells (as in heavy), i've had to add about 70g of weight to the cars i race to reach the minimum limit. The big problem now though i think with the weight removed will be the balancing, all the weight will be on the electrics side of the car, the battery side will be very light & will still need a few weights to even out the weight distribution even though the cars will be "legal" without adding any weight.

I must say i've never been a fan of the excessive weight limits & frankly can't see the point as they hinder performance, i mean the manufacturers must spend a fortune of R&D money on improving their cars & employ skilled technicians with physics degree's to work on a part of the chassis that will be making it stronger, improve the performance of the car & in the process shaving off a few grams here & there - only for some regulator to come along & slap a weight limit on the regulations so that means all the hard work of the highly qualified & skilled technicians has gone up the wall thanks to a bright idea by someone who quite frankly hasn't a clue! Yes, impose weight limits as ballast to slow down the top drivers to make the competition tighter, but as a technical point it's a step backwards in my opinion.
Alternative way of looking at it is this: the weight limits for off-road are fairly standard around the world and have been around alot longer than most (any?) current production cars, so the cars have been designed around the weight limit.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-12-2009
Big G's Avatar
Big G Big G is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 2,696
Send a message via MSN to Big G Send a message via Skype™ to Big G
Default

I think my B44 tips the scales around the 1670g mark (lipos/brushless) and that's only got 50g of weight so still a fair few grammes off the limit (1588g). I did install a blue alu screw set which shaved 10g off the total weight hehe.

I only put the weight in to try and stop it nose diving so much over jumps.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-12-2009
Mad-Wolfie's Avatar
Mad-Wolfie Mad-Wolfie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Stoke on Trent (UK)
Posts: 308
Default

Col you make a very good point, the off-road weight balance is more evident because of course a car with a heavy front will always land hard on it's front wheels so needs to be strong - making a car stronger usually adds weight & likewise a car will roll to the side on landing if all the weight is running all along one side, so the designers have to take this into account no doubt.

Even on older Tamiya buggies such as the Grasshopper / hornet etc i remember all the weight was running evenly along the centre of the car with the battery dead centre & usually slung low... on the more modern off-roaders all the drivetrain, bulkhead blocks & the points for mounting the electrics are central to spread the weight around to get the weight footprint & the centre of gravity even. You don't tend to get that layout on tourers (apart from perhaps TA-04's & HPI Sprint 2's) so to balance the weight around you need to add weights to the lightest side, which when running cells was the electric side, but since LiPo's have come along it's now the battery side.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com