BRCA proposals

[Lee]

I know people are talking about proposals for lipo etc, but has anyone else proposed anything?

I would like to see a dodgy step on every rostrum at a national even, just as a bit of a gamble really, it keeps things interesting.

It could also be ammended to say, if the given step does not give way at an event it should be carried over to the next event so you have 2.

Would anyone second it?

[stegger]

I'll second it will give me somebody else to laugh at instead of people laughing at me The amount of times i've fallen of a rostrum or pit chair, normally after a night out

[stegger]

Just thought about it Lee it could be called the THE ROSTRUM ROULETTE PROPOSAL

[bert digler]

Originally Posted by stegger

I'll second it will give me somebody else to laugh at instead of people laughing at me The amount of times i've fallen of a rostrum or pit chair, normally after a night out

perhaps they could make it out of the same stuff as xx4 wishbones and paint it

[clarey]

lol that would be funny

[telboy]

Hmm, I can see Preddy opposing that one Lee!

[MATTY]

[Lee]

SPAM???????^^^^^^^

[clarey]

thats what I thought too

[jimmy]

Spam got deleted before you even replied! POWER!!!

[clarey]

wow that was quick work

[strobe]

Bring back the BQ Helmet. (hat)

[Lee]

I have just been reading the proposals and i agree with most points made and the proposals, but one of the proposals i have a query with?

The one about adding 7 places to your best round score, but what happens if you get four 1's

would you get 7 places added to your fastest time but you then have another 3 1's which are then set in a slower time but then end up a better score.

can anyone clarify will you end up with 9 points or 2?

[Garry Driffill]

I remeber at Jarrow regional i slipped on the bottom step EVERY time LOL. First time i slipped and thought nothing of it, second time i walked slower and still managed to do it again and the third time i did it i went on my arse haha

= Retard.

LOL

[stuartw]

Originally Posted by Lee

I have just been reading the proposals and i agree with most points made and the proposals, but one of the proposals i have a query with?

The one about adding 7 places to your best round score, but what happens if you get four 1's

would you get 7 places added to your fastest time but you then have another 3 1's which are then set in a slower time but then end up a better score.

can anyone clarify will you end up with 9 points or 2?

Lee
Under Round by Round only 2 scores count and the other 2 are discarded.
So, in your example of someone achieving the perfect four ones, then seven places would be added to his fastest Time of the 4 making that an 8 so that would be discarded, his 2nd fastest time and his third fastest time would then come into effect so he would still have 2 points.

[Lee]

Thats what i thought Stuart, but i didnt know if the penalty had to be used.

thanks for clearing that up

[Lee]

What do people think of the current proposals?

Im not sure about the top 33% gain F1 up to a maximum of 35? i think it should be one or the other.

[Cockerill]

It needs to be like that Lee in case numbers drop again, then if we had 35 F1's it could be half the series. That's why the % value keeps it proportional.

[Lee]

I understand that Tom, but why cap it at 35 if you want it to be proportional, its not like it would ever go over 50 really?

[Northy]

Originally Posted by Cockerill

It needs to be like that Lee in case numbers drop again, then if we had 35 F1's it could be half the series. That's why the % value keeps it proportional.

Are you on crack? Read what you put - "in case numbers drop again" - if it's a percentage the number drops too.

G