Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Tamiya

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default trf201 shock rebuild.

I rebuild the rear shocks and it seems that they are not really smooth ,they are really stiff,
Same with new rubber rings,
The shocks are the greys ones with the normal silver shaft and for some reasons the Rings assembly combination does not match the one on the manual.
What I got is 2x rubber rings and 2xplastic rings.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-02-2012
mattybucks mattybucks is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,800
Default

I would recommend following Lee's guide on TRF Racing.

Do the plastic rings move freely on the shock shaft? You may need take a reamer to it, just to widen it a little.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-02-2012
muratti's Avatar
muratti muratti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria/EUROPE
Posts: 764
Default

Strange to hear as the TRF201 comes with gold shock bodies and shock shafts, did you get it second hand? Follow the manul exactly, maybe you mounted on of the plastic shims (i think the smaller one) in the opposite direction, i think there are 2 white plastic parts. One rod guide and 2 shims. It would be better to buy the Rod guide set and better Orings than the Tamiya ones, the rod guide set allows you to shim the O ring, makeing it smoother or harder just as you like, part number is 53979:

http://www.ebay.at/itm/Tamiya-53979-...item5adc4d7c81
__________________
Xray XB4 ‚18
My showroom: http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom.asp?id=10777
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default

yes the buggy was second hand and came with the grey shocks??
this what i have at moment,there is no space for anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-02-2012
mattybucks mattybucks is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,800
Default

Is it on both shocks, or just one? Also check that the shock shaft, or even the shock body is not bent.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-02-2012
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Probably someone has used the gold cylinders on their 511 and sold the 201 with the std cylinders. Nothing wrong with them. The shim set that muratti posts a link to replaces some of what you have. It comes with instructions. Sometimes you need to shave a fraction off the std guides so that it doesn't compress the oring quite so much.
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-02-2012
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattybucks View Post
Is it on both shocks, or just one? Also check that the shock shaft, or even the shock body is not bent.
Yea I have had a shock body ever so slightly oval too.
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich D View Post
Probably someone has used the gold cylinders on their 511 and sold the 201 with the std cylinders. Nothing wrong with them. The shim set that muratti posts a link to replaces some of what you have. It comes with instructions. Sometimes you need to shave a fraction off the std guides so that it doesn't compress the oring quite so much.
Shaving? I guess so because every ring will not fit.
By the look I'm missing 3 parts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-02-2012
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

No, the TRF201 has the rod guide set as standard. That´s what the manual is showing.
You have the "standard" aeration damper parts. You seem to have all those parts.

So the 2 thin plastic spacers and shim you see in the 201 manual are replaced with one thick spacer. And there is no spacer/guide at the bottom of the bottom cap.

So you put one o-ring in the bottom cap, then the thick spacer and on top of that the other o-ring.
In the shock body you put the thin spacer.

Have a look in this 511 manual. Page 13:
http://www.tamiyausa.com/pdf/manuals/42139ml.pdf

Is the thin plastic spacer warped? Or is it ok?

Also as already mentioned, use a reamer to slightly increase the hole size in the bottom cap:

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default

After some playing around I decide to shave a bit off from the guides and they seems to got way better. Every thing else seems to be OK.
Fredrik Emilsson can you tell me how many different shocks tamiya makes for the buggy and the difference between them ,pro and con ,thanx
I will rearrange the rings in the way you are saying,at moment I inserted the two rings together with plastic spacers on each side.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-02-2012
Rich D's Avatar
Rich D Rich D is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 2,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guinness View Post
After some playing around I decide to shave a bit off from the guides and they seems to got way better. Every thing else seems to be OK.
Fredrik Emilsson can you tell me how many different shocks tamiya makes for the buggy and the difference between them ,pro and con ,thanx

Just make sure that they dont leak. I did the same when i used the std orange o-rings and it made them feel much more smooth.
__________________
Richard Drury

See My Feedback

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default

They are much better now ,but I did reassembled in the wrong order , guide-ring-ring-spacer. Once home will rearrange to ring-guide-ring-spacer.
__________________
TRF416 TA05MS F104 TRF503 TRF201XMW TRF203
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-02-2012
Fredrik Emilsson's Avatar
Fredrik Emilsson Fredrik Emilsson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 513
Default

There are basically 2 versions. With or without coated shafts, shock bodies and rod guide set.
There are also 2 different piston lengths.
Coated only available in one length front/rear though.
201 comes with all options. 511 and 502X with the parts you have.

Coated shaft and shock bodies are supposed to have lower friction. Not sure if they are worth upgrading performance wise. Bit bling of course.
Maybe top guys notice the difference, who knows.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-02-2012
guinness's Avatar
guinness guinness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik Emilsson View Post
There are basically 2 versions. With or without coated shafts, shock bodies and rod guide set.
There are also 2 different piston lengths.
Coated only available in one length front/rear though.
201 comes with all options. 511 and 502X with the parts you have.

Coated shaft and shock bodies are supposed to have lower friction. Not sure if they are worth upgrading performance wise. Bit bling of course.
Maybe top guys notice the difference, who knows.
thanx for the info.
i did reassemble the shocks in the proper way and they seems to work ok now.
__________________
TRF416 TA05MS F104 TRF503 TRF201XMW TRF203
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com