Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino_D
The dimec +8 chassis is still better on low to med grip surfaces. It is more flexible and forgiving. The aluminum will be more responsive on high bite surfaces.
As for the -2 LRC hanger. You will need to use the 0-3 rear front hanger, which will give you 2 degrees squat and 3 toe. If you use the 3-3, you will have 5 degrees of anti squat.
|
Lowering the RR hanger 2mm adds 3 degrees of anti-squat. So if they changes nothing on the chassis or RF hanger, it'll be 3-6 degrees of anti-squat. I only run MM4 and I only really run 0 and 1.5 degrees - I've run 3 degrees on carpet just once, the rest of the time the car needs the 0 deg - particularly with the HRC, but with the LRC I think the car (for my tracks and setups) will still be best off with a mild anti-squat setting.
As for the DIMEC chassis, I understand the whole idea of flex, but flex is not the way to gain grip on low-bite tracks - I'm sure it helps, but it doesn't do as much as dialled in shocks, or a ball diff over a gear diff. In addition, a plastic chassis results in a light car, and with the bumpy tracks I drive on you need a heavy car to soak up the bumps. Lastly, I have yet to witness someone breaking an alu DEX210 chassis, and the DIMEC doesn't quite have the same reputation