View Single Post
  #493  
Old 12-06-2013
Shimmy Shimmy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 94
Default

So I tried to figure it out myself, pretty sure it's still mostly wrong and missing bits but...
I know it's probably no use for the RB6, just wanna know what I'm getting myself into/trying to understand the progression of the buggies and the differences they made.

I'm assuming the longer arms help with steering and forward bite and stability over bumps and higher roll resistance?
While the std/shorter arms lock the rear end with more side bite/less steering, also having a lower roll resistance?

To my understanding the different length arms also require different length bones.

Arms (MID=mid arm shock mounting)?
UM503 (RB5, short/std front, rear?)
UM521 (SP, 2x shock mounts)
UM521-1 (SP-TYPE B-MID, rear arms 2mm longer )
LAW43-01 (NCG/MID arms, from conversion kit LAW43)
UM566 (SP2 WC-MID, 2mm longer arms)
UM713 (RB6 Rear)
UM712 (RB6 Front)

Hubs
UM519 (SP, Type B)
UM519-2 (SP2, Type B2, Camber Links 2mm further out)
Alloy hubs have combined mounting positions?
LA244-0 (RB5-Middle, same camber positions as UM519 but with vertical adjustment)?
LA244-05 (same as above but .05 toe).


Suspension mounts
UM567 (SP2 WC, "Type C", to be used with UM566)
Reply With Quote