Quote:
Originally Posted by Click
The only problem I have is my poor memory  
I still maintain there was some discussion about this rule change, again as I keep saying, from memory, I thought it was agreed that the 2.4m would be applied where possible and/or it would be an aspirational width if the location allowed.
I think we should all just move on, it's water under the bridge 
We have a good thing going in the Naul, long may it last |
Think we will have to get a film crew in and tape next agm Kev. So we can back track on what was said.