Quote:
Originally Posted by Meath77
I'll go to the next meeting anyway Kev.
So, is this what normally happens:
- Someone wants a rule change.
- Stick it on the agenda/proposal
- Word it differently in the meeting, so it's passed without any fuss
- Turns out the rule change is rubbish.
- Have to wait till next year to change it back, in the meantime the nationals suffer!
|
What are u on. If u want i can post the proposal from the agm if you want it made clearer. The rule had one change to It 2.0 to 2.4 for all areas off the main straight.
It's not a rubbish change it was done for a reason it just happens now that the track the club have proposed to run with doesn't suit the guidelines. Some people made a complaint to the rccaoi committee and from what I can see the club committee choose not to make an attempt to alter the track to bring it more in line with the track specs. The rccaoi are stuck in a difficult position because what is voted in by the driver present at the agm is the guideline they are are asking to run with as it's not the committee who make up the rules. If there is a issue as clearly some drivers had then what do they do forget the handbook altogether. Why have a rule book then.