Quote:
Originally Posted by Click
It saddens me to see this situation unfold as it has.
I was at the RCCAOI AGM when a member proposed the change, I and others enquired if these were written in stone or just guidelines, from memory we were told they were guidelines, aspirational rather than dictates.
It seems now they are being regarded as dictates, this was not my understanding at the AGM.  |
Anyone know how this changed from a guideline to a rule? Did whoever updates the 1:10th rules mishear it and think it was a track width was to be set in stone?
Because if whatever was said in the AGM was written down differently in the rulebook is surely void?
I don't know how these things work, but if we're not using the naul because someone wrote something down wrong at a meeting it's a bit over the top. This is remote control car racing, not the Lisbon treaty. It should be changed easily enough
