Okay new question?
what would all the members of this club prefer?
a) a club that listens to its members
b) a club that ignores the thoughts of its members and dictates to them!
Shane - I would seriously reconsider if you are suggesting we ban additive from TC too!
I think you need to remember this is not a business in which you are 100% share holder.
This is a club in which people choose to support and attend for thier enjoyment.
Sorry - strong words but I cannot believe after everyones post you would ignore and try an ultimate ban on additive - apologies if this isnt your call I'm just going on the evidence I have to hand.
I started this post to see if other users thought the same as me, and then if so we could act. And at every opportunity I said a decision should only be reached if its shared decision.
What is now apparently being suggested is very frustarting for me as it contradicts everything I have partioned for. What a waste of my time.
Personally, I feel TC cannot operate without additive - this view is shared by every other TC driver.
However, Stox we do not need additive. again a view shared.
Therefore, it is not unreasonable to ask Stox users not to use additive. BUT IT IS unreasonable to TELL TC users they have to go without.
As Gunter has said, years of TC use with additive hasnt caused the damage, the stox additive has. Therefore, for now I suggest only placing the burden of the ban on the Stox and see how that goes.
I'm not saying never ban addtive for TC - as if everyon agreed the track ultimately needed it then we'd all agree to ban TC additive too. BUt for now, lets see how the non-use of oil based additive does to the track.
Again, why act drastically and anger members when this is supposed to be for fun - you have the committment of others (stox users) thanks to the way I approached the subject - lets not exploit this and ban ALL additive use (yet)!
|