View Single Post
  #12  
Old 01-12-2012
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foggy444 View Post
Fully agree with everyone on the bodyshell proposal. I think we should all be able to go with our own schemes. But I do agree that lights should be depicted in all cases. Not so sure about grills, but that's because my painting skills are rudimentary at best and I despise stick on decals with a passion!

As to renaming the classes I agree with that, but think the rules need to be tougher on the 'production' class ie, control motor, speedo and battery as well as a control tyre.

A lot of people will disagree with this but it would make for a very cheap pure stock class, and might even encourage more take up at the national level.
assuming you have done a national , you would know that control tyre is a no go as both chassis use different shores to stop grip roll or even get grip, you could end up with one tyre and one of each car that suits the grip/tyre on the day
as for control speedo motor etc, that adds cost as the only way to police that is have a set motor/speedo/lipo, some racers use old speedos or given speedos to keep cost down and you will force them to buy a "spec" set
the idea is to have both classis run side by side
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote