View Single Post
  #18  
Old 14-08-2012
Apricot Slice Apricot Slice is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
Do you. Want to protect the Speedo or alter the handling?

Is that a rhetorical question? Presumably you are suggesting that 2.4 thickness would be best.

When I was wondering about chassis thickness I had in mind a vision of an old Mardave Mini (the one with no suspension at the back) doing wild bouncy flexy things.
In my mind, a rigid chassis is best because the part that you have control over is the spring. Anything else doing the bouncy business mars the results of adjustment. Although in practice, something more flexible may be better.. I am unsure.
My guess is that Schumacher have got it right.
I have ordered a piece of each thickness so may as well try both.
__________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Reply With Quote