Quote:
Originally Posted by Northy
The point is this is a BRCA series, and therefore must be run to the rules in the BRCA rule book, *some* of these are allowed to have a 'regional variation', but it's not possible to just go making new ones up *I THINK* <-- that last bit is my opinion and is not an official statement from the BRCA (no matter what it says in my sig) and is in case I am wrong - I have been wrong before, 1998 I think it was...... 
I'm sure Stu is talking to the people he needs to to sort this out, but I feel for him, his new job is not an easy job when things are going smoothly. |
True, but BRCA rules can be changed just like any other, and if there is a demand to do so that can happen. I know it needs to be proposed, seconded, voted etc but remember we are talking 2013 series here. Rules have to change to adapt to circumstances and if enough people feel that way and vote that way they will.
Sly - I know about Batley and Keighley, but that sort of shows up my point. The series is down to 3 clubs as it is and one is quite remote from the other two (good though it is). If Bury or Southport decided the same as Batley and pulled out the whole thing would fold......