Put it this way then Chris:
How many people have voiced their opinion on a public forum = LOTS.
How many people have voiced their opinion trackside = LOTS
And how many people have spoken to the WRCA directly = Little if at all anyone
My point is that despite discussing on a public forum is less than ideal, at least it gets people talking, and it gives the WRCA committee something to read and get the general feeling. At the AGM proposals were asked for, and very little were given, this just proves my point.
People will not and do not speak via the appropriate channels anymore, the internet and forums is where most matters take place. I spoke with H last year and agreed that discussing on a public forum is not good, but after the poor showing at the AGM, it seems at least discussing it on a forum is better than not discussing at all.
The past few threads which have been closed also prevented any progress, moderating the content would have been a better idea. Despite the discussion being quite heated, at least it was progress and you could get a feel for how people felt.
Ask those same people to e-mail you with their thoughts and i doubt youd receive 1 e-mail.
|