View Single Post
  #6  
Old 22-08-2007
Jonny Aird Jonny Aird is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCM View Post
wishbones were not beefed up accordingly after issue's with the Mi2, bulkheads are very heavy, steering arrangment is 'awkward', they use the silly 'mount the suspension on the bulkheads' philosophy, which, ok, give almost infinite adjustments, but to 99.9% or racers, just adds confusion, the layshaft needs a beefier support system etc etc etc.... and now Schumacher being Schumacher, are now releasing softer wishbones (but still not beefed up), new chassis, new topdeck, ne bulkheads, nearly a new car.

At least the S400 looks like a solid and simple car to work with, which is the better option always.
Wishbones I find are fine. Not broken 1 yet.

Bulkheads are heavy but what problem does that really create? You just have to add less weight to the car.

The infinite adjustments give people the opportunity to change anything they like, and lets customers have the same cars as the top drivers.

Layshaft needs a beefier support? I don't understand this one? Again, what is the problem with the layshaft?

Softer wishbones also can be used as a tuning aid on low grip tracks. Again, I don't understand why you have a problem with them?

Tamiya's TL01 is a solid and simple car, hardly any adjustments, maybe give it a try? Just joking, but nothing is meant to cause any offense in this post. Just expressing my views on the car and having a discussion with you regarding it
__________________
XRAY - Hudy - Spektrum - Moorespeed - GM Racing - Dynamite - MB Models - APE
Reply With Quote