Dude, not a lot of what's happened on this thread is ideal. The fact that I think at this point that it's for Vega to tell us what's going on doesn't mean I think it's their "fault" or anything like that.
For what it's worth, I think if the brca or a brca official has an issue with a car, they should discuss it in private with the manufacturer rather than say something publicly before they know for sure. Then it's for the manufacturer to to communicate as necessary with us customers.
FOR THE SAME REASON though, I think that's still what the brca should do, and therefore that it's still for vega to tell us. I just don't see how it would help for someone from the brca to post that it's illegal for example, let vega deal with it, so they could simultaneously announce what they're doing to fix it...hopefully it's legal anyway though!
With G, even he's admitted it was an error to post originally, I don't think anyone is saying it was done well, and IF he can post on here (which we don't know) you can argue either way whether he should say more. None of that justifies attacking his integrity though, sorry, in my view anyway, it just winds me up to see that part of it!
Remember, I'm a customer here, I have a spare shell so may lose money on 2, so if despite all that I think it's gone too far against him, maybe that should give everyone pause for thought!
