Quote:
Originally Posted by LiamD
When you submit a motor to the EB, do you need to send every possible armature on sale, for that particular can & endbell? I don't know for sure, but I doubt it.
So if one Novak sintered rotor is made legal (for example), why should all the other rotors need to go through the EB again?
I think this is Mark's point... which I agree with.
|
First point -
Manufacturers and Importers should note, that if a range/type of motor is to be retailed with a choice of armature design, then a sample of each armature design (up to a maximum of three) must be submitted. The design samples are required to accompany the motor when it is submitted for homologation. All variants homologated must be available for retail purchase.
They don't supply each wind but the different web designs - torque or rpm which have different web thicknesses.
The all have different rotor designs and some even have specific rotors for winds!
What Mark is suggesting that they are all just allowed across the board regardless if the manufacturer supplies them with the motor. They will have to be submitted by LRP and Nosram. Look at all the Stock motors - they individually homologated despite coming out of the same factory in the Far East.