This rule has got to be kicked out. Its made for ferrari who dont have the best reliability
driver a wins 9 races at random but fails to finish any other races =90pts
driver b wins 6 races = 60 points then comes 2nd in 3 races =24pts
he comes 5th in 4 races =16pts and fails to finish the rest = 100pts surley driver b has won the championship for being the more consistant driver.
as mention in an earlier post the season could be over after 9 races then will the sponsers still see F1 as a good investment when they realise that just maybe millions of viewers worldwide wont be bothered to watch the rest of the races as they will have become no more than a sunday church outing.. Would any team care about the rest of the season or more likely put all their efforts into next years cars Why waste money on lost cause if theres nothing to race for
|