oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   JConcepts (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Shocks off the Back!!! (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8127)

GPS1 11-02-2008 03:53 PM

Shocks off the Back!!!
 
Can anyone explain to me why I'm seeing people running their BJ4's with the rear shocks hung off the very back?! i.e, the wrong way round to the standard kit way. It looks like an easy job to do, re-mount the rear tower off the back brace, drill the wishbones on the rear and re-hang the shocks!!
But, what effect does this have on the handling of the car?

Lee 11-02-2008 04:20 PM

Never seen it personally mate but i would imagine its to stop the rear end collapsing. i dont know why they would do it though or what difference it will make

GPS1 11-02-2008 04:30 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If I didn't explain myself very well perhaps this picture will help!!

AndyM 11-02-2008 04:49 PM

they are that way round on an Atomic Carbon S4 aswell...

maybe Jonathan can enlighten us?

GPS1 11-02-2008 05:03 PM

You're quite right, the Atomic run's this way too! They're also like this on the Losi! I'v even seen it done on some Yok's?!

CraigM2610 11-02-2008 06:28 PM

i thought id seen on a yok
i think it just makes it more stable at the back

Northy 11-02-2008 06:32 PM

Is it because it looks better? :confused:

Chrislong 11-02-2008 06:54 PM

It moves the weight further back, not that 99% of us would ever feel that effect to be honest.

if the wishbones flex, then having the shocks on the rear mean the wishbones will never flex into a state of pro-squat... although with the materials used in todays kits - nothing flexs so much anyway.

Im trying to apply some logic, and can't think of any other reasons - other than taste and perhaps a slightly different mounting position but I can;t vouch for that.... Im sure somebody must know.

xx4-nutter 11-02-2008 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrislong (Post 93212)
It moves the weight further back, not that 99% of us would ever feel that effect to be honest.

if the wishbones flex, then having the shocks on the rear mean the wishbones will never flex into a state of pro-squat... although with the materials used in todays kits - nothing flexs so much anyway.

Im trying to apply some logic, and can't think of any other reasons - other than taste and perhaps a slightly different mounting position but I can;t vouch for that.... Im sure somebody must know.


thers many reasons for this but not as many reasons in numbers to mach the amount of sponsors in Chris Longs sig !!! LOL

must work, most of the top cars have this sort of set up

GPS1 11-02-2008 10:37 PM

So, other than perhaps for it's looks and a very,very,very slight chance it will handle a touch better, we saying we don't really know?!

xx4-nutter 11-02-2008 10:44 PM

id imagine at high speed corners you wouls feel a difference

Chrislong 11-02-2008 10:58 PM

No i don't think you would to be honest.

Imagine the shocks weighed 1kg combined, then moving them like this would perhaps reduce initial steering and increase pendulum effect. But they weigh a 10th if this at the most, and I really don't think it'll e felt.

This is also a mod done to Bosscats, and more recently to XXX4's (which I think it was designed to be done as a choice)

bigred5765 11-02-2008 11:21 PM

i have no idea
but have heard it moves the weight around so its all sprung weight between the shocks
help settle the car down
not from experience but over heard conversation

Northy 12-02-2008 08:39 AM

Does it alter wheel rate slightly? :confused:

The rear inner pivot point is wider than the front one due to the inboard toe-in. Elvo will tell us.

G

Richard Lowe 12-02-2008 09:17 AM

All it will do is move the weight very slightly, I can't see it making any other difference except as Chris has said about the wishbones flexing a tiny bit.

Rich Cree tried it at Southport and I think the conclusion was it made no difference :)

Northy 12-02-2008 09:22 AM

Rich,

But is the wheel rate affected by the inner pivot distance?

G

Richard Lowe 12-02-2008 09:35 AM

Since you have to drill your own holes to mount the shocks on the back of the wishbones I wouldn't think so ;)

Northy 12-02-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Lowe (Post 93471)
Since you have to drill your own holes to mount the shocks on the back of the wishbones I wouldn't think so ;)

But only if you cad'ed it all up and calculated where to drill the new holes to keep the wheel rate the same?

ELVO!!!!!!:confused:

G

Lee 12-02-2008 10:15 AM

I think G is right here, if you drilled the hole inline with the one at the front, i think you would be changing the wheel rate, i think it would give the feel if standing the shocks up more and without moving them out on the tower:eh?:.

Could this stop the arse end leaning so much?:confused:

Chris Doughty 12-02-2008 10:40 AM

if you drill the holes the same distance from the inner pivot on the wishbone the same as they are on the front the wheel rate wont change (the leverage will still be the same)

however, this distance on the back side of the wishbone will be wider appart than on the front of the wishbones due to the toe-in, so if you leave the upper location of the shocks the same, your rear shocks would be layed down more.

but I think the biggest thing you will notice is the rear weight, and also, if you do it right, the rear wing will be further back.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com