oOple.com Forums
Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   The PlayGround (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   BRCA proposals (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13962)

Lee 12-09-2008 10:37 AM
BRCA proposals
 
I know people are talking about proposals for lipo etc, but has anyone else proposed anything?

I would like to see a dodgy step on every rostrum at a national even, just as a bit of a gamble really, it keeps things interesting.

It could also be ammended to say, if the given step does not give way at an event it should be carried over to the next event so you have 2. :thumbsup:

Would anyone second it?:lol:

stegger 12-09-2008 12:32 PM
I'll second it :thumbsup:will give me somebody else to laugh at instead of people laughing at me:lol::lol::lol: The amount of times i've fallen of a rostrum or pit chair, normally after a night out:woot:

stegger 12-09-2008 12:34 PM
Just thought about it Lee it could be called the THE ROSTRUM ROULETTE PROPOSAL :lol:

bert digler 12-09-2008 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stegger (Post 159053)
I'll second it :thumbsup:will give me somebody else to laugh at instead of people laughing at me:lol::lol::lol: The amount of times i've fallen of a rostrum or pit chair, normally after a night out:woot:
perhaps they could make it out of the same stuff as xx4 wishbones:lol: and paint it :thumbsup:

clarey 12-09-2008 03:20 PM
lol that would be funny :thumbsup:

telboy 12-09-2008 09:38 PM
Hmm, I can see Preddy opposing that one Lee!:p

MATTY 12-09-2008 09:47 PM
:lol::lol::lol::woot::lol::lol::lol:

Lee 16-09-2008 03:26 PM
SPAM???????^^^^^^^

clarey 16-09-2008 03:27 PM
thats what I thought too :thumbdown:

jimmy 16-09-2008 03:28 PM
Spam got deleted before you even replied! POWER!!! :lol:

clarey 16-09-2008 03:29 PM
wow that was quick work :thumbsup:

strobe 16-09-2008 06:54 PM
Bring back the BQ Helmet. (hat)

Lee 22-09-2008 09:03 PM
I have just been reading the proposals and i agree with most points made and the proposals, but one of the proposals i have a query with?

The one about adding 7 places to your best round score, but what happens if you get four 1's

would you get 7 places added to your fastest time but you then have another 3 1's which are then set in a slower time but then end up a better score.

can anyone clarify will you end up with 9 points or 2?

Garry Driffill 22-09-2008 09:30 PM
I remeber at Jarrow regional i slipped on the bottom step EVERY time LOL. First time i slipped and thought nothing of it, second time i walked slower and still managed to do it again :lol: and the third time i did it i went on my arse haha :lol: :lol:

= Retard.

LOL

stuartw 23-09-2008 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee (Post 162206)
I have just been reading the proposals and i agree with most points made and the proposals, but one of the proposals i have a query with?

The one about adding 7 places to your best round score, but what happens if you get four 1's

would you get 7 places added to your fastest time but you then have another 3 1's which are then set in a slower time but then end up a better score.

can anyone clarify will you end up with 9 points or 2?
Lee
Under Round by Round only 2 scores count and the other 2 are discarded.
So, in your example of someone achieving the perfect four ones, then seven places would be added to his fastest Time of the 4 making that an 8 so that would be discarded, his 2nd fastest time and his third fastest time would then come into effect so he would still have 2 points.

Lee 23-09-2008 08:45 AM
Thats what i thought Stuart, but i didnt know if the penalty had to be used.

thanks for clearing that up :thumbsup:

Lee 23-09-2008 04:05 PM
What do people think of the current proposals?

Im not sure about the top 33% gain F1 up to a maximum of 35? i think it should be one or the other.

Cockerill 23-09-2008 05:09 PM
It needs to be like that Lee in case numbers drop again, then if we had 35 F1's it could be half the series. That's why the % value keeps it proportional.

Lee 23-09-2008 05:13 PM
I understand that Tom, but why cap it at 35 if you want it to be proportional, its not like it would ever go over 50 really?

Northy 23-09-2008 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cockerill (Post 162446)
It needs to be like that Lee in case numbers drop again, then if we had 35 F1's it could be half the series. That's why the % value keeps it proportional.
Are you on crack? Read what you put - "in case numbers drop again" - if it's a percentage the number drops too.

G


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.
Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com