![]() |
Want a fast saloon - any advice?
Hi all, i currently drive a 2005 Mazda6 diesel and I can't fault it: its done 88,000 miles, sips fuel and never misses a beat (touch wood).
Im looking to change it this year for a performance saloon, for less than £5k and less than 60K on the clock. I would prefer a pre-2006 model as theese are cheaper and don't carry £400 + per year in road tax. My shortlist is as follows: Subaru Legacy 3.0R (4wd might be just out of my price range though) Ford Mondeo ST220 BMW 330i (not my favourite, but they are rear wheel drive) Saab 95 HOT Aero - probably the cheapest and quickest, but 250Bhp through the front wheels!! :woot::woot: Do any of you folks drive any of these cars? which would be your choice? are there any areas to stay clear of? are there any cars that should be on the list but aren't? |
The question is, how many miles do you do a week to justify the fuel costs. I own a BMW 530i sport (petrol), currently averaging 24mpg was doing 19mpg in the winter months.
I dont use it for communting anymore and only do around 100 miles every 3 week, but when i was communting doing around 160 miles a week, it was costing £50 a week to run, and that was before the fuel prices went silly. |
And my choice would be a BMW 330i sport, but i dont think you would get a decent low mileage one for that price tho. Followed by the moondog st220, these in petrol format are getting cheap as chips now and are probably cheaper to up keep than the unrealible diesel shat version. I wouldnt waste a good fart in the other 2 tho. :lol:
|
Cheers for the info Daz - im not doing the high milage I used to (less than 10K a year now) so am not too concerned about the higher fuel consumption. With my last job I was commuting 300 miles a week and was costing me a fortune - even with a frugal diesel.
Looking on autotrader, there does seem to be an abundance of pre-2003 BMWs (both 330 and 530) with a low milage - they seem to be quite cheap now so might be able to bag a bargain |
No worries, dont forget tho 10000miles a year is nearly 200 miles a week. That would cost me 70-80 quid a week to run, in mine. But if thats what you want, go for it. I sold a Mondeo tdci what was doing 50 mpg for a big barge. Just cos a wanted one and couldnt stand driving a bag of shat diesel. Diesels in my eyes are for people who have given up on life and brag about how much fuel they save a year, but when it goes wrong they go all quite and realise that the petrol equivalant is actually cheaper to run in the long term.
|
The St220 is a good car. I loved mine when I had it hugely practical saloon and the engine is great. Little bit more exclusitivity than the bimmer if you ignore the ST diesels. Recaros in leather are nice to :thumbsup:
|
Audi a4 3.0 tdi
Bmw 330d |
I'm biased but a 330d is a fantastic car.
|
Cheers for the comments guys - there certainly seems to be a lot of love for the Mondeo and the BMW.
Has anybody had much experience with the Saab or Scooby? I have also looked at the 330d but im going to struggle to find a low-milage one for my budget. From what i've read I shouldn't be disappointed with any of the above. The Beemer seems to be the best engineered, best drivers' car, there are plenty of them out there to choose from and would be a sensible choice, but lacks the exclusivity that the others have and am worried about the price of parts (a mate has also told me that Subaru parts are quite expensive too). |
My favourite car I've ever owned (not the best mind you) was an old school Saab 900. For me after the early to mid nineties Saabs were just rebadged GM crap, just pale imitations of the the real thing. I'm still thinking about getting an older non turbo 90016vS as a bit of a weekend car.
I'd still say that once you've owned the 3 litre BMW diesel (my best not my favourite mind you) your hooked for a long time and it's very difficult to go back to anything else. It still puts a smile on my face after more than a year. |
No love for the Mazda 6 MPS?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bit over priced but that could be knocked down. Loved my 6 143 Diesel, got a 3 2.0 Sport Petrol, which i love even more. :wub |
Quote:
|
I have a Saab 9000 running 320BHP through the front wheels, and it's fun. It's an old shed now, but a facking quick one :thumbsup:
I'd imagine the 95 HOT would be pretty much the same. It will suck the fuel down if you boot it of course, but I get 34 mpg on a steady run which ain't bad all things considered.. |
Quote:
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...85qn?logcode=p |
I like it. Lot of car for the money. You either like Saab's or you don't. I've had mine for 8 years so no surprises which camp I'm in..
They are generally well built with loads of torque so feel faster on the road than the figures suggest, if that makes sense. To be fair, there's so many good cars around I don't think you can go far wrong with any of your choices.. |
I owned an ST220 estate for 18 months and only got rid of it cuz of the ridiculous fuel economy - other than that I would put it in my top 3 cars owned (and i've owned a few!)
It had plenty of torque and no blowers so there was always instant power. The handling was amazing for a big car, it was comfy on motorways, had plenty of room and all the kit you'd ever need (leather, auto lights, auto wipe, cruise, air con etc). The BMW will probably be a great car, but you'll no doubt get a much lower mileage Ford for your money. |
Honda accord type R?
|
Quote:
|
What about an Alfa? The monster depreciation will have leveled out for a 2006 car and play right into your hands.
Every car fan should own one at one point in their lives, it's a box that needs to be ticked. You could also go a bit wildcard and get a Volvo S60. |
Quote:
|
what about a VR-4 saloon?? You can get them for £4k for a minter 280bhp twin turbo goodness!!
|
Quote:
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi.../vr4?logcode=p Might have to search long and hard for one with fewer miles but what a car!!!!! |
have you considered the mazda rx-8....cracking car for very little money these days........would it be big enough for you thought,i quess thats the question......
also the last vectra vxr's and signum 2.8 turbos can be a steal for the money these days |
Quote:
1) Not really enough space - the wife and I go camping around Europe every year and we struggle to fit everything in the 6 2) The rotary engine - if the previous owner has looked after it correctly then they fine but they can be a nightmare if they haven't |
Thems the bad boys!! Heres mine!!
http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/n...lie600/vr4.jpg Currently under lock and key in my mates garage as pictured behind it. Super VR-4 1 of 24 ever made in red with 400 bhp at the wheels, and plenty mods! Still just gets 20mpg if you drive like a tart, single figures if you get silly!! Will make most evo and scooby owners shrink into non existance! |
have you looked at skoda octavia vrs? massive boot for all the camping gear.10mpg better on feul then st220 and quicker and i bet the build quality is up with the rest
|
Quote:
Steelie - that VR4 looks ace, I like the fact that the power in the brocure is stated as "280" bhp because Japan won't allow the marketing of anything more powerful, even though it blatantly has so much more!. What advice would you give to somebody looking for one? |
service history!!
Car is pretty much bullet proof ALTHOUGH if you get the tip tronic, the gearbox oil need changing every 10,000 miles no particular hardship, but must use the right oil. if the torque converter is juddering its usually cos the wrong oil has been used. The gearboxes are pretty much indestructible. Only other things are centre diffs thru neglect by not changing the oil on service intervals (£100 for a good second hand one and 2 hrs to fit! Piss easy job) and the active rear diff again thru not servicing. Basically service it properly and they live for ever OH and do 180 mph!! (well if you turn the boost up a touch they do) |
Cheers for that advice - the Mitsubishi is definately one to look out for, particularly as exclusivity is pretty high on my list (not to mention doing 180mph!)
|
The Volvo S60 T5 is also a contender (thanks dad!), nearly fell of my chair when I saw this one on autotrader :lol::lol:(although I can afford it):
http://pictures2.autotrader.co.uk/im...?id=1638549020 |
Went for a spin in my mates Audi A6 2.7 twin turbo. He booted it up the dual carriageway and got it down to 5.4MPG :lol:
|
Thats good going, I only managed to get a Dodge Viper down to 6MPG (and that was on a track too:woot:)
|
|
I wouldnt touch the RX-8 Chris.
I think the Mondeo fits your bill perfectly although the Volvo also looks nice! Mondeo 0-60 7.4 seconds Volvo 0-60 6.9 seconds The Volvo ticks all the boxes for performance according to parkers website, but the mondeo is rated better for being more practical and less costly. |
but there both fords and both shit slow!! My vr-4 will get to 60 in about 4.5ish if I launch it right! And bear in mind the saloon VR-4's are lighter so theoretically faster!
Just to tease you some more this is the Saloon SUPER vr-4 (mine is the estate version), they only made 18 red ones and are rare as hens teeth!! http://www.clubvr4.com/forum/vbpgima...1&d=1302412829 and the view the chavs will get in the corsa's and 106's http://www.clubvr4.com/forum/vbpgima...5&d=1302412862 |
Whats wrong with Fords? :p
EDIT: Just seen your pics afterwards. The Vr-4 is nice, but will cost more to run and maintain etc. Also depends if Chris wants a slightly newer car with a more modern feel. For outright speed, yeah get the vr-4, for something a bit more modern and pokey rather than balls out speed, Mondeo or Volvo, |
Quote:
|
the Mitzis drive like a new car mate! I was amazed when I bought mine cos I was looking at an evo or a scooby but the vr-4 drives soooooooo nice. Dont have to drive like a twat, can use it as a big luxo barge because it drives like a tight 5 series/e class, but will destroy them all except the mcLaren mercedes (I tried and got made to look silly!!)
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com