oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   I Made This ! (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Look what I did today :D (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1180)

Richard Lowe 30-09-2006 10:59 PM

Look what I did today :D
 
I got bored today, so I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon and find a use for my old IRS TC3 chassis...

http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/6...overallvh0.jpg

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/174/b4cmtoplz2.jpg

Sorry for the appalling camera phone pictures.


Not bad for an afternoon with the dremel :)
Now it's only a proof of concept so there are, 'issues'. I fully expect it will snap in half if I land it too hard as I've had to take so much off the chassis at the back, those kind of issues :D

I've tried to keep all the heavy stuff as close togeather as possible and the weight distribution front to back is almost exactly the same as a standard car. If anything it's a bit heavier at the back than normal.
The gearbox and rear suspention are all un-altered, and a standard gear cover + bodyshell fit too. The wishbones are mounted to a carbon fibre T-plate with modified BJ4 suspention mounts, and by making the rear shock tower in two parts I can use a standard BJ4 rear shock tower too.

Just need a meeting to run it at now :rolleyes:

jimmy 30-09-2006 11:15 PM

awesome start there rich! I guess the losi is an easier car to start somethign like this since you have the hinge blocks that can mount onto a flat plate carbon chassis if you go that way. more more:D

Richard Lowe 30-09-2006 11:23 PM

This is just a cheap way of testing the layout before I get a carbon chassis made up, and I'm fed up of waiting to get hold of a GT2 front end :rolleyes:

I origonally got the Losi with the intention of turning the gearbox round as the B4 looked too hard to do. Now I've got a CR I ended up doing a B4 instead :p

DCM 30-09-2006 11:32 PM

Right, thats it, I am going to do mine mock-up this week.... turn this totaly on its head I think.

Northy 01-10-2006 08:31 PM

Any better pics Rich? Where and when are you going to run it?

G

Richard Lowe 01-10-2006 09:37 PM

I'll fire up the D70 tomorrow G, what do you want to see?

I'm going to run it whenever I can throughout the winter.

PaulRotheram 01-10-2006 09:45 PM

pics of how and where the rear end is mounted would be nice.. and the shock tower peices. :)

elvo 02-10-2006 08:27 AM

I like!

BenG 02-10-2006 09:08 AM

dude, how did you reverse the gear box? Got any pics of how you did it?:confused:

_sleigh_ 02-10-2006 09:27 AM

It ain't reversed

Richard Lowe 02-10-2006 09:58 AM

For the moment I just turned the gearbox 180 degrees, if the layout works well I'll look into flipping the layshaft over and having the motor spin the normal way.

Chris Doughty 02-10-2006 10:00 AM

good skills Richard!

looks a bit long though?

BenG 02-10-2006 11:46 AM

hmmm, I think I am gonna try this with my B4 soon. I am also gonna mod the chassis, and a new bodyshell and wing made;)

Richard Lowe 02-10-2006 11:49 AM

It's deceptive, the rear wishbones are now swept forward and the shocks/tower are on the other side, so there's a big gap where all that lot would be. I don't have another built up B4 to compare it with but it's more or less the same wheelbase as a CR.

BenG 02-10-2006 11:54 AM

got any more pics matey? This looks very swish, not a bad afternoon's work LOL

Richard Lowe 02-10-2006 09:26 PM

Here's some better pictures, be gentle :p

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/9063/overallsq0.jpg

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6408/chassismo0.jpg
I went a bit mad with the side of the chassis here, I could have left more on the vertical part of the tub and still had clearance for the motor.

http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/3117/spurmz1.jpg
A bit more chassis left here.

http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/866/tplateoa6.jpg
T-plate, the wishbones are as low as possible, level with the bottom of the chassis at the back.

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3...eelbasedl7.jpg
Lined up against a standard B4 (bottom), both chassis are level with each other. The mid car (top) is actually slightly shorter.


There's a lot of tidying up to do, especially stuff like how the gearbox ties into the top deck and the rear shock tower mount. The cut down u-brace for the rear toplinks will be carbon fibre eventually, and I'd like to mount the gearbox lower into the t-plate too.

If it works well I'm going to make a full double deck chassis using the GT2 truck front end, there will also be enough room for the radio gear on the chassis. As it is currently with the bracing ribs of the chassis I think I'm going to have to dump either the speedo or reciever on the top deck.

BenG 03-10-2006 06:58 AM

dued that is way cool. I am thinking about modding my B$. I have decided to mould an insert for where the layshaft normally goes out of the tranny box, and cut a hole in the other side, switching the slipper round, so it will work as norm.

May I ask, where did you get all those blue poles? and carbon fibre?

Thanks

BEn

Richard Lowe 03-10-2006 08:19 AM

The T-plate, lower rear shock tower and small piece that links the gearbox to the topdeck were an IRS TC3 chassis, the top deck was a B4 FT battery strap.
The blue spacers are from the IRS chassis (the thick ones) and an old BJ4 http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4407/smashud5.gif

xx4-nutter 03-10-2006 08:29 AM

that looks bloody great u recon u could be faster with it ?, because at the castle howard earlier this year u were flying with ur ft b4 in the final and won even though u had a 2 minuite time handy cap right?

cheers garry;)

elvo 03-10-2006 08:44 AM

You don't need to mod the tranny to make the motor spin the normal way. the lads who tested this, and claim that running the motor in reverse is 'not quite the same' were using V2 motors. V2 endbells are not symmetrical..... if you flip the endbell 180°, the timing is off by a couple of degrees. Hence the difference.

You don't need a GT2 front end either. The 2WD durango has a bent piece of metal (25°). Like the B3, in fact. Works fine.

Good thinkin' to use the BJ4 toe in blocks. Let us know how it handles! Can't be bad, really. the weight is right where it should be, and a little more aft than on the X-6.

Chris Doughty 03-10-2006 09:05 AM

Moulded carbon tub with the kick-up included in it would be dialled!

BenG 03-10-2006 09:31 AM

you sure about turning the timing 180 degrees? If so, that would make my mod a heck of a lot easier, as I was planning on slightly modding the gear box. I think to do the mod properly I may still mod the tranny anyway, as it will make installing motors easier in the long run. I am thinking about making a skinny chassis, can I use my B4 chassis? And just cut off sides, and re-enforce it?

Thanks

Ben

Cooper 03-10-2006 10:13 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by www.tyrc.co.uk (Post 12410)
I am thinking about making a skinny chassis, can I use my B4 chassis? And just cut off sides, and re-enforce it?

yeah but why would you do that? it's the ideal place to mount electronics low and it would give the car alot more flex around the axis in the lenght (let's call it X-axis) In the attachment you can see how Elvo and me reinforced our Saddle pack B4 prototype.

BenG 03-10-2006 10:16 AM

right, that looks good. I may do something like that, or consider taping them in;)

Richard Lowe 03-10-2006 10:17 AM

You'd be relying on the bracing that normally goes either side of the cells for strength, but it wouldn't be there :p

I don't see any advantage to having a super skinny chassis like the Durango, we don't have issues with the sides grounding anyway on the B4 as the chassis curves up at the sides :confused:

DCM 03-10-2006 10:55 AM

Cooper, I bet that still twists though, as the two carbon braces aren't tied to each other, though about doing a one peice topdeck??

TYRC, ther is no advantage, like Richard said, in chopping off the sides, the only way to go with that idea, to a narrow double deck carbon chassis....

Cooper 03-10-2006 11:08 AM

DCM: yeah but we don't want to waste expensive carbon for that :D

first test is to see if the concept works and can always be refined later, the braces used here are chopped carbon Losi baterry braces (recycling saves the planet!)

elvo 03-10-2006 11:21 AM

99% sure, yes. The brushes are not 90° to the screws.

A narrow chassis looks cool, but that's about it. If the sides are raised like on the B4, and you put the heavy stuff in the middle, that'll be fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by www.tyrc.co.uk (Post 12410)
you sure about turning the timing 180 degrees? can I use my B4 chassis? And just cut off sides, and re-enforce it?


BenG 03-10-2006 11:36 AM

well, I think I may have to go down the skinny carbon fibre chassis:D

BenG 03-10-2006 11:37 AM

is it possible to cut carbon fibre with a jig saw?

Richard Lowe 03-10-2006 11:48 AM

It's possible but you'll need a reasonably fine blade, one designed for aluminium would probably work. Be careful :o

BenG 03-10-2006 11:57 AM

yeah with all the dust and shards LOL. I think a C.F. chassis will be a future devlopment.

DCM 03-10-2006 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by www.tyrc.co.uk (Post 12425)
is it possible to cut carbon fibre with a jig saw?

A fret saw and a vacumn cleaner would be the easiest and cleanest way, just wear latex gloves, long sleeve top and a dust mask.

elvo 03-10-2006 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by www.tyrc.co.uk (Post 12425)
is it possible to cut carbon fibre with a jig saw?


Yes. Expect to change the blade every 10mm you cut.

fybre-lite would be the sensible option.....

BenG 03-10-2006 12:57 PM

whats a fret saw Steve?

Cooper 03-10-2006 01:10 PM

dremel ?

DCM 03-10-2006 01:23 PM

googles great.... http://www.tooled-up.com/Product.asp...ite&PID=138450

A jigsaw is a bit like taking tyles off a wall with a jackhammer, not exactly accurate and overkill. The fretsaw is far more accurate, and depending on the blade, can go around tight curves to. An essential item if you do lots of work.

elvo 03-10-2006 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCM (Post 12437)
can go around tight curves to. An essential item if you do lots of work.


I like to go around tight curves.... :D

DCM 03-10-2006 01:41 PM

me too, but the only chance I got at the moment, is doing bodyshells, lol

elvo 03-10-2006 03:44 PM

( o )( o )


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com