oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Race Chat (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   PT - What do you use (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=116026)

mikeyscott 29-11-2012 06:43 PM

PT - What do you use
 
I'm just interested in what PTs people use in their cars. I'm not interested in what is better and so forth.

Cosworth 29-11-2012 11:07 PM

Mrt....

My amb finally gave up after 6 years service so got the mrt purely because it's more aesthetically pleasing :lol:

mark christopher 30-11-2012 11:14 AM

mrt x 6 (but can only cast one vote) cloned to my personal number

had one go down which i think could have been user error, sent to mrt and thier 1st class service saw me with a new replacement within one week!

you can not get that with amb/mylaps

RogerM 30-11-2012 12:38 PM

1 original AMB, shared between all my cars, that I had to buy in order to be able to run 1/8th rallyX in about 2006 or so.

I actually left it unused for about 18 months as prefered to use the handouts until the rules were calrified on missed laps with PTs.

Hope I never have to buy another as it's been good this long, still on it's original lead and as I say gets swapped between cars as I only have one ... don't know what people are doing to kill them!

Adam F 30-11-2012 03:11 PM

Really? a poll on PT's?

fidspeed 30-11-2012 03:19 PM

i own 4 gen AMB's in various states of condtion

i just pick them up when commercially viable

Chequered Flag Racing 30-11-2012 03:43 PM

Have an original AMB which I had cloned to a few MRT's and is still working today. Have one MRT that's not cloned and possibly one other.

mark christopher 30-11-2012 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x313 (Post 717715)
Really? a poll on PT's?


makes good sence if his club is thinking of upgrading to rc4, and 1/3rd of racers use mrt, which could result in a loss of entrants.

just going on what op has posted prior to this...

haggis 30-11-2012 04:15 PM

mrt all the way, was the same price new as a second hand amb

mikeyscott 30-11-2012 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 717733)
makes good sence if his club is thinking of upgrading to rc4, and 1/3rd of racers use mrt, which could result in a loss of entrants.

just going on what op has posted prior to this...

Correct, market research etc.

Not a decision to be taken lightly.

Myself I use Harry PTs, but it's not about me.

Skye 30-11-2012 04:29 PM

The poll percentages are currently totalling 120.7% ......:eh?:

Coastal 30-11-2012 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyscott (Post 717740)
Correct, market research etc.

Not a decision to be taken lightly.

Myself I use Harry PTs, but it's not about me.

Interesting poll, like you I am thinking of upgrading our club to the RC4, but the majority of our members use MRT's and until it is confirmed they work OK with the new decoder like you I am holding fire.

In reality I cannot see why MRT's will not work as the RC4 will work right back to the AMBrc Handouts (which we use at the club)

Rob at BBK will be using the Decoder in parallel timing at this weekends Rug Racers, so hopefully we have more info then

Crazy L 30-11-2012 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x313 (Post 717715)
Really? a poll on PT's?

Hey, It's Mikey :thumbsup:

Alas, It's a necessary evil that affects how we race, like it or not. AMB for me, the MRTs weren't around when I bought my PT. MyLaps want an arm and a leg nowadays so if I were to do it again, I'd keep the money in the country and buy British. Cheaper too.

TARTMAN 30-11-2012 05:27 PM

both.
 
well. I have had both, but i have sold my MRT's and use the Harrys now, mainly they are small and easy to fit anywhere and unique, i had an MRT that was a clash, cant be having that!
So MyLaps for me now...... No more clashes......

interesting regarding the new system etc. and MRT's. Hopefully there all compatable....

Chequered Flag Racing 30-11-2012 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skye (Post 717741)
The poll percentages are currently totalling 120.7% ......:eh?:

it's coming down 119.81%

maybe Jimmy's upgraded the site to use a new decoder :lol:

mark christopher 30-11-2012 05:51 PM

Percentage is screwed as its a multi choice poll, so Dale has been able to vote for amb and mrt.

does not mean the percentages need to be looked at, just on numbers using each version a third roughly use mrt

mikeyscott 30-11-2012 05:52 PM

Rib me all you want, I'm not doing it for some bollocks post count.

It's about looking at what's out there, being used and so forth. Then what's best going forward etc.

I've had discussions with various people.

I like Darren have seen clashes re PTs. I'd like the best tech for the sport, but equally don't want to alienate racers.

As a racer I'd have RC4 tomorrow

fidspeed 30-11-2012 06:17 PM

chill mikey :lol:

its obvious the poll is nt totally accurate

your original post is however spot on and an excellent way of researching the viability of clubs up grading to RC4

kind regards fid

mark christopher 30-11-2012 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyscott (Post 717771)
Rib me all you want, I'm not doing it for some bollocks post count.

It's about looking at what's out there, being used and so forth. Then what's best going forward etc.

I've had discussions with various people.

I like Darren have seen clashes re PTs. I'd like the best tech for the sport, but equally don't want to alienate racers.

As a racer I'd have RC4 tomorrow

i think your doing the right thing by asking??

lordnikon 30-11-2012 06:29 PM

Right behind this 100%. Using an MRT and thats my only option, plus only really racing at TORCH I would need to know if they are going to work with RC4 or not. Would ideally like to know before renewing my membership as if they upgrade thats another £50+ on a transponder for the privilege of racing

hotrodchris 30-11-2012 07:44 PM

MRT as have 3 so cheaper!

knighthawk 30-11-2012 08:14 PM

3 x MyLaps Harry's
5 x AMBrc PT's

Not been greedy, These are for my two sons and myself, lol


I agree with Mikey, this is a great poll, clubs need to know how an upgrade is going to affect turnout at their meetings.

On another thought, is there any BRCA requirements about which decoder is to be used in a National or Regional Events ?

mark christopher 30-11-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knighthawk (Post 717809)
3 x MyLaps Harry's
5 x AMBrc PT's

Not been greedy, These are for my two sons and myself, lol


I agree with Mikey, this is a great poll, clubs need to know how an upgrade is going to affect turnout at their meetings.

On another thought, is there any BRCA requirements about which decoder is to be used in a National or Regional Events ?

there is no requirment for brca to use amb ( if another was to become available ;) ) or to which race programe is used

MattW 30-11-2012 09:46 PM

Well, the electric touring car rules to state AMB/Mylaps. The Off road section just references drivers must use personal transponders.

knighthawk 30-11-2012 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 717813)
there is no requirment for brca to use amb ( if another was to become available ;) ) or to which race programe is used

Mark, sorry chap, I don't mean about the type of program, I mean are BRCA going to say clubs need to be RC4 compatible to apply !!

Col 30-11-2012 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 717770)
Percentage is screwed as its a multi choice poll, so Dale has been able to vote for amb and mrt.

does not mean the percentages need to be looked at, just on numbers using each version a third roughly use mrt

Mark is correct - I have both original AMB and a MRT, so have voted for both.

mark christopher 30-11-2012 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knighthawk (Post 717826)
Mark, sorry chap, I don't mean about the type of program, I mean are BRCA going to say clubs need to be RC4 compatible to apply !!

thats what i put ;) brca dont stipulate in general rules that amb (now mylaps) must be used AMB make the timing equipment, bbk/rctiming do the race software.

Matt has pointed out that elec tc do state amb/mylaps, but not which software version

of road as matt has clarified dont stipulate either, so to me, they should all run (sections) what is currently proven to work! so as to qoute the brca motto "promote the sport of model car racing"

mark christopher 30-11-2012 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Col (Post 717827)
Mark is correct - I have both original AMB and a MTY, so have voted for both.

:woot: folk will talk again, :thumbsup::lol:

Jason A 30-11-2012 10:10 PM

I have always used mrt's and had 2 programmed on the same number never had a clash.

With every thing going off I must admit I jumped ship and now own 3 mylaps Harry's which seem future proof as they send rc2 and rc4 signals.

Crazy L 30-11-2012 11:09 PM

I understand Mikeys intent fully, it's for the greater good "the greater good"

I'll do what I can to keep racing.:thumbsup:

RudeTony 01-12-2012 07:59 AM

OMG
Its just a vote to get an idea of numbers.
Mike is right doing this pole - just vote - no life stories - that's on another thread.....

WiseOwl99 01-12-2012 09:26 AM

I race at Torch with my Dad so this post is relevant !!

2 x AMBrc

JonSmith01 01-12-2012 09:34 AM

Same as WiseOwl99
I race at Torch with my Dad

2 x AMBrc

stuartw 01-12-2012 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knighthawk (Post 717809)
On another thought, is there any BRCA requirements about which decoder is to be used in a National or Regional Events ?

For 1/10th Offroad Nationals, the section provide the Timing Equipment - currently BBK Software and an AMB RC3 Decoder.
For Regionals, the Host Club generally provide the Timing Equipment (either their own or borrowed from another club).

Stuart.

knighthawk 01-12-2012 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stuartw (Post 717900)
For 1/10th Offroad Nationals, the section provide the Timing Equipment - currently BBK Software and an AMB RC3 Decoder.
For Regionals, the Host Club generally provide the Timing Equipment (either their own or borrowed from another club).

Stuart.

Cheers Stuart for the reply !
Then the question next is, are BRCA going to upgrade to RC4 ??

mikeyscott 01-12-2012 10:25 AM

I expect they are looking at it and think should be left to do their investigation etc.

So back to the point please, this is a poll for now and can be discussed on the other thread.

knighthawk 03-12-2012 08:18 PM

http://www.bbksoftware.com/

Makes intersting reading and clear issues

mark christopher 03-12-2012 08:22 PM

So does this, 63. Racers were using mrt, all off which would not be able to compete

http://rcracechat.com/vb/showthread....989#post442989

knighthawk 03-12-2012 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 718621)
So does this, 63. Racers were using mrt, all off which would not be able to compete


Mylaps answered this for you !

Quote:

This demonstrates that all AMB/Mylaps transponders work reliably with the RC4 Decoders but MRT transponders do not, in fact only 1 in 5 PTX transponders recorded any laps at all. We have offered a trade in for MRT transponders in exchange for Harry transponders since April 2010 and continue to do so.2nd December 2012

mark christopher 03-12-2012 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knighthawk (Post 718637)
Mylaps answered this for you !

Nope that tells me
We have developed a new system that no one model car racing club or organization needs (as our bumph says its to improve accuracy for f1 etc) as what they have now works, oh and while we screw the clubs over, those racers who run another brand will have to return to our monopoly so win win for us, loose loose for racers and clubs.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com