oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   R/C Graphy! (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Canon 450D - and Lens for RC Photography (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10882)

neiloliver 16-05-2008 08:44 PM

Canon 450D - and Lens for RC Photography
 
I am looking at getting a 400D or 450D. I want to use it for landscape, familiy and RC car photography. What would people advise re a lens other than the 18-55 bundled? My total budget is around £700.

Neil

Stu 16-05-2008 08:46 PM

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-EOS-400D...713.m153.l1262

+

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-EF-S-17-...713.m153.l1262

+

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-EF-70-20...713.m153.l1262

mole2k 16-05-2008 08:52 PM

You could probably squeeze a 2nd hand 70-200 f4L into that budget, its a fantastic lens for the money and would be very good for getting close into the action.

Stu 16-05-2008 09:01 PM

Sound advice.

Neil, don't rush anything - come see me or Jimmy at Talywain.

neiloliver 16-05-2008 09:14 PM

thanks guys, i have a lot of research to do I think. The 400 really has come down in price. I wont me at Tally Stu :( unless i come down for the day to watch

I was looking at this Tamron lens -

http://www.jessops.com/Store/s66320/...)/details.aspx

hero or zero?

N

Stu 16-05-2008 09:19 PM

Tamaron (& Sigma) suff is good - but if you can afford proper Canon lenses (and it seems you can afford Canon L at that) then get proper Canon ones.

For what you say you want the camera for 300mm is OTT.

As Mole says - the 70-200 F4 L is ace - it's what I use for all the RC & rally stuff, and I suspect Mole uses his for all the rally stuff also.

Try to avoid the Canon 17-55 lense that often comes with the kit - it's crap. You can afford the 17-85 instead which is much better.

JCJC 16-05-2008 09:33 PM

Canon Outlet is back on eBay they have some of these, worth a look
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet-D...742.m153.l1262

thats 400d with the 18/55 stock lens at £299 + £5.99 post, or others you can bid on. also 70-200 F4 L's to bid on

http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet-E...742.m153.l1262

Stu 16-05-2008 09:36 PM

Good skills Jordan.

JCJC 16-05-2008 09:54 PM

Hi Stu, its Jordans dad, we found a second hand 70/200 f4 L late last year , great lens, and great advise from you last year, will use it at Swindon on Sunday.

Look at these, someone had a couple of good buys:

http://search-completed.ebay.co.uk/s...p=1%26fsoo%3D1

Stu 17-05-2008 08:24 AM

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet-D...713.m153.l1262

That will be a super buy.
The 350 is essentially the same as the 400/450. It has a smaller screen and a lower pixel count (that makes no difference) plus a few other unimportant things.
What is important is it comes with the much better 17-85 lens - instead of the 18-55.

Canon are ace - they bring out new models almost every day, generally with gimmiky extras that make little difference to the photographs produced. It keeps the prices in Jessops sky high, and the cost of the 'old' models drops like a stone.

Canon outlet's ace - I think I'm gonna get a 5d from there, hopefully they will bring out a 6d, then I can cash in on the price crash.

neiloliver 17-05-2008 07:16 PM

Stu,

I have been looking at the Canon lenses on this page. On the first two in the list, what is the difference between EF and EF-S ?

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/cate...=3077&brand=37

I am thinking of either the 400D or 450D with the 18-55 lense and then getting one of these 55-200mm lenses. Is that a better choice than 75-300?

I sound a right noobie! :(

Stu 17-05-2008 07:33 PM

You have a £700 budget man - you can do better than that.

Forget the 18-55 lens - it's crap.

You can afford a body with a 17-85 lense - which is much better.

You can also afford a 70-200 F4 L - which is, as stated above, ace.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet-D...713.m153.l1262
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-EF-70-20...713.m153.l1262

Both those two shops are good - I've had stuff from the both on more than one occasion.

jimmy 17-05-2008 07:39 PM

I think the EF is normal full-frame format lens, the EF-S is for compact sensors like the 300D/450D 20D-40D etc etc. I think.
Agree with Stu, the sort of setup he's shown is great.

Stu 17-05-2008 07:39 PM

You may be able to afford a 30d - which is better class of body.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Canon-Outlet-D...713.m153.l1262

mole2k 17-05-2008 07:42 PM

EF-s lenses are made for 1.6 crop camera's like the 20/30/40D and 350/400/450D, they wont work on full frame cameras.

As stu said above deffinately go for the 17-85 and 70-200 instead of the kit 17-55 and 55-200. The lenses are a world of difference its like comparing toy camera's to professional gear.

Jonathan 17-05-2008 07:50 PM

(ok, Im too slow, you had a couple of answers to this already !)
EF-S lenses only fit digital cameras with cropped sensors / are specifically designed for the smaller non full frame sensor. However you still have to multiply the quoted zoom by 1.6 to give the equivelant focal lenght.

Ive had an EFS 17-85 IS on my 20d for nearly 4 years. Turns your SLR into a great walk arround / travel camera and can take a nice picture but it is limiting in creative and low light action photography.

Its nice to have the wide angle though.


Quote:

Originally Posted by neiloliver (Post 124860)
Stu,

I have been looking at the Canon lenses on this page. On the first two in the list, what is the difference between EF and EF-S ?

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/cate...=3077&brand=37

I am thinking of either the 400D or 450D with the 18-55 lense and then getting one of these 55-200mm lenses. Is that a better choice than 75-300?

I sound a right noobie! :(


neiloliver 17-05-2008 09:00 PM

Thanks all, The ~£330 (inc postage) for the EF 70-200 F/4.0 L USM is far better than the £450 in Jessops. I will try to get down to Tally' to take a look at people gear, in the mean time i will continue my research.

Cheers
Neil

tjpMT2 17-05-2008 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 124872)
Forget the 18-55 lens - it's crap.

You can afford a body with a 17-85 lense - which is much better.

You can also afford a 70-200mm F4 L - which is, as stated above, ace.

The original 18-55 lens was crap, there were rumors that it cost canon a couple of quid to make :thumbdown: The new IS version is meant to actually be alright for 'happy-snappy' use and small prints. The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is meant to be a great lens. People have said its a EFS lens with L class glass :thumbsup: but it will put you over budget though... If your budget ends up being stretched which everyone’s ends up doing have a look at the EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM is a great lens its got to be the best for RC use. Takes great shots and as its a L lens which means its 100% sealed so no dust getting in I’ve got a 400D and use the EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM (MK 1 is pictured not MK 2!)which was recommended to me by the photographer for the MaxBashing magazine (its a RC Mag I promise :lol:) and its been great for RC and every day use, however slightly poor in low light.

Heres a few pics, all are by me and first 4 are of same event,

Canon40D w/70-200

Canon 400D w/28-105

Be careful of Honk Kong sellers a lot of the stuff over there is fake. Make sure it has the little Gold label on the camera. A great place to pick up a cheep 70-200 is from a seller who is located in Scotland on eBay. I can't seem to find him now but ill go and find a link to him, in the item name it norm says *IN SCOTLAND*. Edit: Cant find him anymore seems he no longer sells as his link comes up as invalid, but THIS is in the UK and is the same price as the one from HK...

I hope Jimmy doesn't mind me linking to other forums but a great forum for cameras is DPreview...

mole2k 17-05-2008 10:38 PM

I think the scotland seller you are talking about is called Ian kerr or Kerso. He sells a lot of stuff on a photography forum I frequent (www.talkphotography.co.uk) comes very well recommended.

tjpMT2 17-05-2008 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mole2k (Post 124949)
I think the scotland seller you are talking about is called Ian kerr or Kerso. He sells a lot of stuff on a photography forum I frequent (www.talkphotography.co.uk) comes very well recommended.

Yes thats him :D

losixxx 27-06-2008 10:21 AM

just ordered my 70-200 F4 L from kerso...will work out at £305 with canon cashback offer:thumbsup:

Chris Green 27-06-2008 11:18 AM

Nice one. I ordered my 55-250IS from him yesterday.

Couldn't afford the L lens though. :(

losixxx 27-06-2008 11:32 AM

I can't but still ordered one:woot:

neiloliver 01-07-2008 04:26 PM

Just got my 70-200 F4 USM... oh she is gorgeous!!!

With the hood on it looks like a Saturn IV rocket. :)

losixxx 01-07-2008 04:50 PM

spooky mine just arrived as well, just havent got the camera yet:cry:

neiloliver 01-07-2008 08:39 PM

so basically, all you have is an expensive telescope! :p

Where did you get it from? mine was from Hong Kong.. but I got stung for Duty :(

losixxx 01-07-2008 09:11 PM

kerso on talkphotography, £355 shipped less £40 cashback so £315 in total, chris green just bought a lense from him, quick service...
he doesnt have a physical shop but just mail him anything your after and he will qoute you the best price in uk by far..
bugger you got stung..

losixxx 01-07-2008 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neiloliver (Post 138792)
so basically, all you have is an expensive telescope! :p

tell me about it, my new toy should arrive 2morrow though:thumbsup:


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com