oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   Atomic Carbon (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Slim 2 (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1044)

Rob Fitzgerald 14-09-2006 09:34 AM

Slim 2
 
Can anyone tell me anything about the Slim 2 ?

any spy shots Jimmy ?

jimmy 14-09-2006 09:38 AM

I agreed to not show anything too revealing, this and the slim4 are really interesting projects and I can't wait to get my oOple hands on them for some reviewage.

OldTimer 14-09-2006 11:11 AM

Rob there are some photos of the two Slim2 prototypes on Racechat ;).

Rob Fitzgerald 14-09-2006 02:18 PM

LOL

Nudey pics ?

I think I might know where now ...

<scuttles off>

jimmy 14-09-2006 02:22 PM

Is the slim2 on a backburner at the moment with the Slim4 taking centre stage ? or are you developing both at the moment ?

BenG 14-09-2006 02:32 PM

slim 2 looks nice;)

Col 14-09-2006 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldTimer (Post 10918)
Rob there are some photos of the two Slim2 prototypes on Racechat ;).

Call me stupid and slap my knackers! I can't find the pics anywhere - got a link to them?:)

OldTimer 14-09-2006 06:27 PM

The slim2 is a long term project like the Slim4, which has been in development for over 1 year, so the slim2 is at a early stage ;)

BenG 20-09-2006 11:19 AM

more pics here http://www.doughtyuk.net/forum/index...opic=1743&st=0

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

That car is SWEEEEEEET:D

jimmy 20-09-2006 11:21 AM

Don't be scared, but this is a Slim2 thread, and those are photos of the slim4 !
:rolleyes:

bigred5765 20-09-2006 11:30 AM

i cant get on race chat, so it would be nice to see the pics on here me thinks,

BenG 20-09-2006 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 11569)
Don't be scared, but this is a Slim2 thread, and those are photos of the slim4 !
:rolleyes:

lol, oops thanks for that:D

OldTimer 20-09-2006 11:44 AM

Photos of the two current Slim2's with diffrent cell layouts, please note that these are the 1st builds off autocad, so i would guess once i have decided which cell layout to go with, they would change from these photos. But early days yet.

http://www.gforceimages.net/4wd/slim2_specA.jpg


http://www.gforceimages.net/4wd/slim2_specB.jpg

BenG 20-09-2006 11:52 AM

thats very good;) Excellent quality, although that spur gear has an output stuck out, will that be removed?

Northy 20-09-2006 11:57 AM

Jonathan, which layout is the favourite at the moment?

G

Southwell 20-09-2006 01:46 PM

I like Spec A layout most but wouldn't that mean you would need cells for 2wd and 4wd?....if you ran slim 2+4.

Northy 20-09-2006 01:58 PM

Spec B looks like it would be better ballanced to me.

Mmmm, interesting....

G

BenG 20-09-2006 02:06 PM

I like the idea of having a *top deck on the spec B* spec B looks better IMO

PaulRotheram 20-09-2006 03:20 PM

spec A has a top deck too though? :confused:

PaulRotheram 20-09-2006 03:23 PM

I like Spec B, but the placement seems to be too far back and not enough weight at the front to give additional steering.

All the weight towards the rear, cells + motor could make the car handle bad when traction is low as it could make the car want to 'swing' more.

Spec A seems to have abit more weight further forward, and more centralised than B. but as already said surely you would need two lots of cells to run both the S2+4?

jimmy 20-09-2006 03:25 PM

I guess a few people do already though. I know I do.
The latest cells are for 4wd and the old ones for 2wd.

Northy 20-09-2006 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulRotheram (Post 11590)
All the weight towards the rear, cells + motor could make the car handle bad when traction is low as it could make the car want to 'swing' more.

As opposed to the motor hanging out of the back Paul! :o

G

super__dan 20-09-2006 04:36 PM

I don't think there is actually that much weight differece balace front to rear between the two, but Apec B looks more balanced side to side and the fact the cells are same config as 4wd surely would appeal to more people.

Dan

jimmy 20-09-2006 04:37 PM

Witht he X6 dan, do you find tho it might not have as much weight over the rear that the slide is easier to control ? or ?

super__dan 20-09-2006 04:39 PM

Would the motor have to run in reverse on Spec B?

Northy 20-09-2006 04:55 PM

He's ignoring you Jimmy!

G

Northy 20-09-2006 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by super__dan (Post 11597)
Would the motor have to run in reverse on Spec B?

Dan, couldn't you just turn the diff round? :confused:

G

Southwell 20-09-2006 04:59 PM

That would work, but with the diffs being the wrong way round arn't they susseptable to loosening?

jimmy 20-09-2006 05:01 PM

you can on some shaft boxes (ooer) but the tc3 gearbox is moulded for one way around so you cant swap the diff round.
Wonder if you could stick it upside down.

but you are right G, he basically blanked me there! :o

Northy 20-09-2006 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Southwell (Post 11604)
That would work, but with the diffs being the wrong way round arn't they susseptable to loosening?

Ian,

When you build your Pred you'll see that the two diffs are different ways round, if they're tight (thread locked) they're fine.

If you think about it, if they were the same way the car would try and pull itself apart, or shortern itself! :o

G

Northy 20-09-2006 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 11606)
but you are right G, he basically blanked me there! :o

I love it when I'm right! :D

G

OldTimer 20-09-2006 05:30 PM

I have raced the Spec B car at a regional and it was very good indeed, i came up with the Spec B car as you find that you get torque steer with spec A as a lot of the weight is over one side.

The spec B car is very well balanced, and fly's extremely well, the rear gearbox is mounted upside down so there is no need to adjust motors etc, with both cars there is a need for a little more weight towards the rear, the spec B car corners like a 4wd and can carry a lot higher cornering speed than a normal 2wd.

Things i need to work on are, better slipper adjustment: As with any mid car when you go on a low grip area it shows up a lot more than a normal 2wd, i would guess the X6 guys would of noticed this.

Alternative front end: maybe a option to use the B4 still looking into this, but this would then make the front and rear ends AE.

Tub chassis: :D with some different machining of the S4 blank chassis this could be used, this would elimante the need for a top deck.

Southwell 20-09-2006 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northy (Post 11614)
Ian,

When you build your Pred you'll see that the two diffs are different ways round, if they're tight (thread locked) they're fine.

If you think about it, if they were the same way the car would try and pull itself apart, or shortern itself! :o

G

Aye, i was more refering the b4's and xxx's, as they can loosen if their on the wrong way..:confused:

Ive seen someone do that to a pred XK5, gearboxes obliterated themselves :eek: :bom:

Southwell 20-09-2006 05:59 PM

I would have thought more people would prefere B4 parts, being as more people run b4's.

PaulRotheram 20-09-2006 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northy (Post 11592)
As opposed to the motor hanging out of the back Paul! :o

G

It depends.. but it is only my view. ill admit im not the most engineering mindly based person, far from it but if all the weight is toward to rear end then wouldnt that make it worse than having 1 motor hanging out the back and cells laying centralised with elecs side by side?

i don't mind if i'm wrong, this stuff just interests me :p

Northy 20-09-2006 06:09 PM

I don't know to be honest, all I know is that from what I have seen the mid motor cars struggle for traction in low grip conditions. A quick fix for that would be more weight to the rear, but it might not be the correct fix.....

G

Chris Doughty 20-09-2006 06:39 PM

mid motor cars you will find they might snatch loose grip, but on the flipside they will also regain their grip after a slide, there is not so much pendulum motion going on.

also, you can turn in harder into the corner because you don't have to worry about your motor on the trailer at the back trying to overtake the front end coming into a corner. this can work as a counter productive behaviour though, if the grip is low and you want to hand bag it into hairpins.

the closer the heavy bits are to the CoG, the less inertia they pick up when the car is moving/sliding/jumping so the easier it is to stop that motion.

as with most things, this can be a good thing and a bad thing, and this is the reason for the snap loss of grip, but also the snap re-gain of grip.

when I say 'snap' loss of grip, I don't mean blink and the car is facing the wrong way, you have to drive it/see it to get my drift (like that ;) ) properly :D

BenG 27-10-2006 03:16 PM

Hows the S2 coming along?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com