Sorry steve
i edited when you posted:eh?:
you need to read the post previous....cheers

Every car is developed and evolves, which costs money. There will be plenty of SX and SX2 still running in 2011. Great.

I'll be purchasing one and that's my choice. Kyosho wasn't for me and I didn't slate it off. I have other thoughts about other cars, but I'll keep them to myself

Most cars have evolved with yearly changes etc.

I'd rather see R&D progress. What about the PC purchased last week which is now out of date and so forth?

get help rebelrc...tell the doctor you are schizophrenic and can't cope any more. you started this so you must like the attention.....:p

Quote : Rebel
Has this car a servo saver?
Cant see it listed in the spec
And steve i am not the first to say the car is not for me so stop shooting me...NOW
If it wasnt for negative debate then we would never progress
Now i put this to you Steve
If this car doesnt have a servo saver and i kick up a fuss, the next one will......understand?


Yes you are probably not the first one and not the last.
The RC world is massive and to get an RC car out in the market which will fit every ones needs is never going to happen and you are one of them at the present time.
And yes i do agree a debate is good if done corectly if not the RC market would not be where it is today.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

LOL
And again

Toy car tinkers lol

Lay Off the alcohol Scott

On a positive note. Schumacher have done a great job on this car and will be one to watch this year for sure.

LOL Grow up Ben

It is a public forum, it's just that people have disagreed with you,
or isn't that allowed to happen?

Step away from the keyboard Scrott.

as grown up as the guy slagging off a new car!

TOY CAR BEN!
OR Peetbee i have disagreed with everyone that the car is ace and thats not allowed to happen
tit for tat
and ben alchohol has nowt to do with it....i am not 17

Sorry Jimmy

sadly this thred has gone from a debate about the pros and conns of the schumacher R&D department and the schumacher marketing machine(with a few toung in cheek comments)...to a bun fight:bored: shame

Just to make sure I'm understood, I am no great fan of schumacher as a company at the min, and it's not only because of the sx3, BUT I by no means am wanting to have a pop at the team drivers, they wouldn't have a drive for long if they did anything but promote the product. If i were to have a team drive, I would be no diffrent;)

1000th post...yay, must spend more time with my family:lol:

Gettting back to the point of the thread, love the changes to the drive only down side is that its shell is to similar to te b44:thumbdown:

And again

Why does it need a servo saver?

Hello mossy
I don't know. Why wouldn't it?is it beneficial not having one?
Civilised disscution
I actually think the sx3 is a nice car and from a painting point of view the new shell is alot better . Lining up a design on the old one with the undertray was a pain

Never broke a servo in my SX2, nice and direct steering :)

Only servo I have broken was in a B4 with the servo saver glued up.

It's also a case of matching the right servo to the car :) Savox 1258 perfect in the SV and SX, 1251 perfect in the TRF511, Sanwa perfect in the 410R :D

Savox 1257 perfect in the Losi XXCR Kinwald

In my opinion, yes it is beneficial not to have one. A servo saver can cause problems with the steering, as in high load situations the saver will flex instead of the wheels turning. Hence why many drivers glue or remove servo savers on several cars.

Maybe they should make one aftermarket for people like me that are really fast between crashes:) and the likes of most of there customers cannot drive like you and mossy do