oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tamiya (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   New updated Tamiya TRF 511! (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18957)

DaveG28 18-03-2009 11:42 AM

Hi guys,

Yeah back to the old shock bodies (although they look a little darker), I'm swapping the option ones off my 501 on to it!

Steering is the same, I've used the 501x Ali hopups as the standard part numbers are all the same!

Slipper is standard but with the new spring, I built a double slipper once and didn't like it tbh!

What effect does rear camber link position have? The kit setting is furthest inboard but there's a chance it will make the ballcup foul on the bulkhead (not assembled the arms below to work out the angles yet!), so was wondering what it would do if I moved it out 1 position?

jimmy 18-03-2009 11:48 AM

Shame about the shock bodies. I was wondering about the slipper also - I use the slipper a lot on my cars and a double slipper sounds like it could be a good idea for me - but it costs a lot of cash for something I'd want to try out. Shame the car doesn't come with it.

DaveG28 18-03-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 219992)
Shame about the shock bodies. I was wondering about the slipper also - I use the slipper a lot on my cars and a double slipper sounds like it could be a good idea for me - but it costs a lot of cash for something I'd want to try out. Shame the car doesn't come with it.

I know what you mean, but the one I built really did seem odd!! Plus you can't use the centre one way with it!

Another q, did anyone ever use the 12 degree castor blocks? Wondering what effect they had as they are the only bling set I have!!

Recycle 19-03-2009 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fredrik Emilsson (Post 219689)
I use the Azarashi undertray with the Tateego body.

I'm sure the Azarashi undertray with the Tateego body is fit to 511 with minor dremel work on rear to overcome the balllink and drill extra hole on undertray for fasten(511 now has 6 no. of bolt and nut to hold the undertray in position). But it is a gap at front part of body, it seems require some work to dust-off.
I know it because I mount Tateego body on 511 already.

DaveG28 19-03-2009 09:05 AM

A more difficult night last night! First one of the ball studs sheared off as I screwed it in, they are using new very shiny ball studs which feel soft, possibly to protect the inner camber links I guess!?

Secondly, this car is not Lipo friendly!!! The only legal pack that will fit will be the TP3200's as the centre bulkhead blocks higher packs. To run other packs will mean either mounting them further back, along with a new rear battery bar mount, or sit them further out sticking outside the chassis!

jimmy 19-03-2009 10:38 AM

I'm a bit surprised they didn't do more for lipo on this car Dave - looks like you might have to dremel the posts to fit a square pack in there like I did on the 501X as well? I hope not.
Just got my car this morning, can't beleive I paid so much for a car without shell or wheels! :lol:

DaveG28 19-03-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 220329)
I'm a bit surprised they didn't do more for lipo on this car Dave - looks like you might have to dremel the posts to fit a square pack in there like I did on the 501X as well? I hope not.
Just got my car this morning, can't beleive I paid so much for a car without shell or wheels! :lol:

I think the posts are ok on cells up to about 137.5mm combined, which is most, but you do need spacers underneath to lift the posts up for virtually all of them except TP. It did surprise me they haven't narrowed those posts though, from the looks of it they've completely ignored Lipo!!

Luckily the undertray is quite a bit wider than the chassis which gives some room to play with!

Let us know if you spot anything obvious in the build! It is scary expensive for what it is isn't it!?

jimmy 19-03-2009 02:40 PM

big s
 
Yeah - I really expected some more stuff - I'm surprised it doesnt have the new shock bodies, the dual slipper, the low friction seals, the machined pistons etc etc.
A big disapointment is the lack of rear diff cover - like the optimized one. I have one but I don't think it'll fit this new design from looking at it - which is a massive shame as it'll make the car harder work in poor conditions. :(

DaveG28 19-03-2009 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 220387)
Yeah - I really expected some more stuff - I'm surprised it doesnt have the new shock bodies, the dual slipper, the low friction seals, the machined pistons etc etc.
A big disapointment is the lack of rear diff cover - like the optimized one. I have one but I don't think it'll fit this new design from looking at it - which is a massive shame as it'll make the car harder work in poor conditions. :(

I agree, I think Tam have been a bit cynical with this one!

Rear diff cover, if you run the shock tower and bulkhead reversed so the shocks are at the back, I think it would then cover quite well, but as standard it's worse than the 501!!

I'm going to look tonight at how to have an additional body section at the back to run the shocks at the back, and may make that my standard setup.

Chris 19-03-2009 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 220387)
Yeah - I really expected some more stuff - I'm surprised it doesnt have the new shock bodies, the dual slipper, the low friction seals, the machined pistons etc etc.
A big disapointment is the lack of rear diff cover - like the optimized one. I have one but I don't think it'll fit this new design from looking at it - which is a massive shame as it'll make the car harder work in poor conditions. :(

To make the TRF511 equal to the TRF501X WE, regarding optional parts, which optional parts are needed?

-sway bars?
-machined pistons?
-alu uprights?
-Alu castor blocks?
-Damper Rod Guide Set ?
-Damper HTC Piston Rods ?

DaveG28 19-03-2009 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 220457)
To make the TRF511 equal to the TRF501X WE, regarding optional parts, which optional parts are needed?

-sway bars?
-machined pistons?
-alu uprights?
-Alu castor blocks?
-Damper Rod Guide Set ?
-Damper HTC Piston Rods ?

All of the above, though not sure everyone agree's the Ali bits are better!? I think the way to think of it is to compare it to the original 501. It's a new car, but with no frills!

Setup wise, does anyone know what setup any team drivers run? Have they been using 12 degree blocks or reversed rear shocks or anything? Other than Hupo do they have any team other than Japan?

AaronR 19-03-2009 07:49 PM

Another LiPo battery option will be the Intellect 30C 4200mAh. I just looked up the specs... 69x46x23mm.

The Trakpower 3200 specs are 71x47x22mm, so one more millimeter in height for the Intellect pack shouldn't be a problem... I hope. :eh?:

Dave, did you test fit a TP 3200 in your car?

pugs 19-03-2009 08:41 PM

Hi Dave, dont know if it helps but the ip4200 lipo fits between the standard 501x battery posts without any mods.

Chris 19-03-2009 09:10 PM

Can anybody upload a scan of the manual?

Thanks in advance.

DaveG28 19-03-2009 11:18 PM

On the 511 there is @68.7mm between posts. The problem guys is the height though, and the rear of the centre bulkhead! So sorry, but 23mm is too high, mine are 22.8 and are too high!! To get round it you either need to move the battery back (which will mean it covers the screw hole for the rear battery post) or sit it further out over the undertray to the side! No way round it!

Maybe a pack that's short enough will have space to move back and still have A battery post (not the Tamiya as it's too thick!) there, or just put the rear battery post in the holes further back for screwing the undertray to the car. The latter is my prefered option but it would need longer carbon battery straps and I don't have any carbon to try!

Will post pics tomorrow of what I mean!

BTW, I need to check but I think the battery's are further forward in the 511 and that's why the bulkhead becomes an issue? I'll check on my 501!

DaveG28 20-03-2009 12:52 AM

Just check and the problem is indeed that the battery is further forward on the 511, hence the bulkhead problem!

DaveG28 20-03-2009 09:52 AM

Does anyone know what diameter the standard piston holes are?

I have the 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 machines option ones, but don't know which equate to the standard parts from the 501?

AaronR 20-03-2009 11:45 AM

Dave, I don't see how the 23mm height Intellect Lipo pack cannot fit. NiMH cells are 23mm in diameter. From the pics I see around the web, it looks like the cells mounted in the 511 are clearly lower than the top deck/rear of center bulkhead area.

http://www.redrc.net/wp-content/uplo...yatrf511-3.jpg

I do, however, see how the lipo pack may come in contact with that center bulkhead, but I would think you can slowly and carefully Dremel the lipo casing to possibly make it fit, or Dremel off the end screw hole on the bulkhead and only use 2 screws to mount the rear top deck to the center bulkhead.

jimmy 20-03-2009 11:57 AM

:woot: Dremeling a brand new TRF511 to fit lipo! :cry:

Gayo 20-03-2009 12:09 PM

Dremeling a lipo :o:o:wtf:


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com