oOple.com Forums - sintered rotors

Page 3 of 3

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)

- Electrics (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - sintered rotors (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2081)

mark christopher

26-01-2007 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cockerill (Post 22438)

Just having another quick look at the rules as I said in the Lipo thread.

EB Rules State:

Manufacturers and Importers should note, that if a range/type of motor is to be retailed with a choice of armature design, then a sample of each armature design (up to a maximum of three) must be submitted. The design samples are required to accompany the motor when it is submitted for homologation. All variants homologated must be available for retail purchase.

Your argument is that a brushless motor has a rotor not an armature. Well a quick search of wikipedia shows that:

In electrical engineering, an armature is one of the two principal electrical components of an electro-mechanical machine--a motor or generator. The other is the field winding or field magnets.

So using a brushless motor as an example would mean the armature is the magnet, also known as the rotor, and the field winding is the wire/can which is the second principle component.

let me guess you race tourning cars too?:D

Cockerill

26-01-2007 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 22437)

brushless from my experience has leveled the field on power and cut down on maintanence cost.

the motors are legal (that have been homlogated) and as from april so are the rotors, it makes sence to allow the two two be used togeter by all

i blew a nosram std rotor to bit, and its being replaced by a sintered (which wont be used till april) you do know the sintered are less liable to fail and to over heating? makeing them even better value!

First Point: I totally agree. Mine has run faultlessly and I love the not skimming every run.

Second Point: I'm sure they will be allowed to be used together, when a motor is homl that is homl with a sintered rotor.

Third Point: Are sintered less liable to fail or is that hear say? I have heard stories of sintered rotors failing as well as bonded. I have never seen either only what I have read, so don't take this to mean much.

Sintered are also apparently a must for touring cars, but the first major race to allow sintered rotors was run with a brushless using a bonded rotor.

Cockerill

26-01-2007 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark christopher (Post 22439)

let me guess you race tourning cars too?:D

Nope

mark christopher

26-01-2007 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cockerill (Post 22443)

Nope

Dam wrong again not doing to well am i :(

i have ben runing touring at BIWS where lipo, brushless and sintered are allowed, seen std rotors go but no sintered and i have not seen or heard of sintered failing, to be honest i have also been told sintered are more important in the lower winds ie 5.5 and 4.5 cuz of the rpm,(which prob rings true to tc) but that all do benifit from running em.
the way sintered is made makes then more durable
some site are claiming if you run sintered the blue temp wire on novak an be removed to prevent thermalling
defo my mamba has them and they do go well

MattW

26-01-2007 10:30 PM

Mark, you seem to be missing my point :confused: :wtf: I said that if all motors are available with both sintered and bonded rotors, then there is no problem - weather they have to be resubmitted - or if the EB change the list to suit does not matter a s@!*.

What does matter though, is if they do not make their range available for sale with sintered rotors throughout. If the only LRP/Nosram that is available with a sintered rotor continues to be a 4.5, then i'm not convinced that you should be allowed to take a sintered rotor and run it in a 6.5 - as that means you have to pay for a motor, take rotor out and buy another one. I'm not convinced this should be allowed.

From what i have been told, sintered rotors should be more reliable than bonded, but it seems that they are not 100% bomb proof. I have heard of some failing.

super__dan

26-01-2007 11:09 PM

Once again the voice of reason and clarity is an 18 year old who by rights, main priority should be looking at porn.

Tom - respect ;)

Chrislong

27-01-2007 12:04 AM

Im trying not to laugh, but, I have to. :D

Northy

27-01-2007 10:46 AM

lmfao :p :p

Northy

27-01-2007 10:47 AM

Dan, you make ace posts, you should post more! :cool:

G

super__dan

28-01-2007 12:55 AM

LOL!

:)

Stu	28-01-2007 10:47 AM

I suspect the person on the keys has some sort of hairy face.

Quote:

Originally Posted by super__dan (Post 22463)

Once again the voice of reason and clarity is an 18 year old who by rights, main priority should be looking at porn.

Tom - respect ;)

Northy

28-01-2007 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 22585)

I suspect the person on the keys has some sort of hairy face.

Never trust a man with a beard, you never know what he's doing behind there, maybe a 10th scale replica of the titanic or mixing liquid hydrogen and liquid nitrogen in a controlled manner......

G

super__dan

28-01-2007 04:52 PM

Stu, no I think that's Tom, not Papa Smirf

vader

29-01-2007 10:26 AM

The force is strong in that one.

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Page 3 of 3

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page