oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   Team Associated (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   B5 and B5M... (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139852)

mattr 28-12-2013 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneKiwi (Post 825275)
and that ridiculous lipo :lol:

it does look like a solution looking for a problem...... saddles will do everything that will, and more.

dpackster1980 28-12-2013 11:14 AM

To be honest it looks good but it's nothing revolutionary. They've taken designs from everyone a put it in one kit. I wouldn't be bending over backwards to get one unless I was changing from a C4.1.

alex97 28-12-2013 11:22 AM

They should have gone for the b44.2 battery clip in stead of the thumbscrews. What the hell is going on with the battery.

racdeaf 28-12-2013 11:33 AM

Doe esc & rx placement look tight fit ? Compare c4.2 which seem loads space

I currently own c4.2 & I personally sticking with c4.2 as it decent car to suit my driving

PaulRotheram 28-12-2013 11:38 AM

There seems to be no battery adjustment. im not sure if there was any in the centro, however in the RB6 it's a tuning aid I use frequently.

And yes it does seem a tight squeeze!

racdeaf 28-12-2013 11:49 AM

On C4.2 there is lipo adjustment such as forward or rear position also stubby lipo fitment too
Then again I don't know about B5M

NeilD 28-12-2013 11:58 AM

According to Ryan Cavalieri via FB the screws are metric.

Origineelreclamebord 28-12-2013 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilD (Post 825299)
According to Ryan Cavalieri via FB the screws are metric.

If so... FINALLY! :)

The B5 seems to take a lot of design features from current cars (of their own and competitors). Imo, they don't have to feel ashamed in doing so though: Many brands have taken inspiration and/or copied design features from AE for years, and from there on other brands have set new standards with certain design features. Instead of stubbornly creating something completely different with a questionmark whether it will work better, they take their turn getting an up to date platform out there based on innovations that were made by other companies.

It seems the task was to get a truly up to date car, and the photos posted so far promise that the car will do a good job at that. The future will show if AE will try to regain the dominant market position again with innovative designs that push the boundaries - If you ask me they will, one does not release two dedicated kits at once if you don't have high ambitions :)

alex97 28-12-2013 12:47 PM

it still has ball diffs :thumbdown:

ASR 28-12-2013 01:08 PM

Where are you guys looking at the rear motor car!?, I can't seem to find any body off pics of that one, think my eyes must be painted on ! :confused:




Quote:

Originally Posted by OneKiwi (Post 825275)
lol that MM looks just like a yokomo, but the RM looks interesting, and that ridiculous lipo :lol:

It does look interesting I have to say, but the imperial screws are a pain, I wonder if they have updated and or beefed up the plastics

I like that the MM has a alu chassis


Origineelreclamebord 28-12-2013 01:10 PM

http://www.teamassociated.com/AREA51/B5

Or just click on the B5/rear motor car/left on the announcement page

NeilD 28-12-2013 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex97 (Post 825306)
it still has ball diffs :thumbdown:


Yeah, that's come as a bit of a surprise. One rumour I'd heard a while back was the rear car would have a ball diff and the mid a gear diff. I don't know why this was but in any case it's proved to be wrong.

stegger 28-12-2013 02:13 PM

Looks like on the Mid car there's about 5mm of room forward of that pack ! and I suppose a stubbie cell could be mounted fore or aft giving you more weight options. On the diff front I would sooner have the ball diff in the kit. As a gear diff is cheaper to buy.

southern racer 28-12-2013 03:45 PM

Fair play to AE at least it turns out both cars are genuinely new chassis and there wasn't just a hopped up b4.2/c4.2 underneath (as some thought from the first 'body on' shots). Clearly they've borrowed some design ideas from similar cars but not nessecarily a bad thing.

Factory Team version of the M would be good.

andys 28-12-2013 03:46 PM

Any speculation as to price - will it be sensible I wonder.
Hopefully closer to £200 than the £300 mark?

racdeaf 28-12-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andys (Post 825339)
Any speculation as to price - will it be sensible I wonder.
Hopefully closer to £200 than the £300 mark?

£280

OneKiwi 28-12-2013 04:13 PM

$260 at tower and around mid March they say

Richard Lowe 28-12-2013 04:16 PM

You can't tell 100% without having one in front of you to look at but all the geometry and component placement on the M looks identical to the Centro to me which is a good thing. It also makes sense to have a ball diff on both cars, the only situation where you'd want a geared diff in a 2wd IMO is when you would be running one of the front motor spazzy 2wd's.
I'm interested to see if the alloy chassis on the M is flat and the kickup is built into a plastic part, or if the chassis is bent up like the C4. If it's flat it'd be perfect for plopping on the front of a B44 and making a front motor car.

I know they aren't the Factory Team kits, but does anyone else think they look a bit 'RTR' with all the plastic?

Lee24h 28-12-2013 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Lowe (Post 825348)
You can't tell 100% without having one in front of you to look at but all the geometry and component placement on the M looks identical to the Centro to me which is a good thing. It also makes sense to have a ball diff on both cars, the only situation where you'd want a geared diff in a 2wd IMO is when you would be running one of the front motor spazzy 2wd's.
I'm interested to see if the alloy chassis on the M is flat and the kickup is built into a plastic part, or if the chassis is bent up like the C4. If it's flat it'd be perfect for plopping on the front of a B44 and making a front motor car.

I know they aren't the Factory Team kits, but does anyone else think they look a bit 'RTR' with all the plastic?

They are factory team cars it just seems the costs need cutting to make them a good price
And all the r and d needs paying for

mes 28-12-2013 05:55 PM

They are not factory team cars. FT kits will be released later on, which is a traditional policy with AE, but not one that I like. Racers will always want the factory version with the aluminum and titanium parts, IMHO there is no need for these 'team' versions. Nobody wants a tuned-down competition car for bashing nowadays. :thumbdown:


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com