oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   Team Associated (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   come on people when is this C4.1 out (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73433)

TheReferee 21-06-2011 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 517871)
The rules don't actually say what you think they are intending to say. I believe you are reading too much into it.

i think they say what i think they say whether what i think they say is what i think they intend to say is of course two completely different things.
i think that clears it up:woot:.

in other words your right Jimmy (i think)

adey 21-06-2011 04:45 PM

speaking of rules, i dont think its a good idea allowing the small lipos to be used. What i mean is that lipos should be either stick or saddle and the same size regardless of maker. I am refering to the small lipo used in the tlr 22. Cars have as long as i can remember been designed around the electrics used, not designing the electrics around the cars. I dont expect many to aggree with me on this.

peetbee 21-06-2011 06:49 PM

On that basis we would never have had saddle packs. Or even worse, does anyone else remember the Tamiya 'hump' packs - we could have been stuck with that!

adey 21-06-2011 07:13 PM

i take it you do you not think there should be any control over battery size then. I didnt think many would agree with me but it makes me wonder what buggies will be like in 10 years time in terms of changing the dimensions of the battery placement.

mark christopher 21-06-2011 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by racingdwarf (Post 517883)
few years ago when the RC8 first came out I think it did close to a full national season with the team drivers before the genral public could get hold of one;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by adey (Post 517954)
speaking of rules, i dont think its a good idea allowing the small lipos to be used. What i mean is that lipos should be either stick or saddle and the same size regardless of maker. I am refering to the small lipo used in the tlr 22. Cars have as long as i can remember been designed around the electrics used, not designing the electrics around the cars. I dont expect many to aggree with me on this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by peetbee (Post 518031)
On that basis we would never have had saddle packs. Or even worse, does anyone else remember the Tamiya 'hump' packs - we could have been stuck with that!


Quote:

Originally Posted by adey (Post 518039)
i take it you do you not think there should be any control over battery size then. I didnt think many would agree with me but it makes me wonder what buggies will be like in 10 years time in terms of changing the dimensions of the battery placement.

there are max dimensions, the smaller packs will fit in a car designed for bigger packs!

neiloliver 21-06-2011 08:00 PM

[QUOTE=The bodyshell we're currently using)[/QUOTE]

..does this mean the final C4.1 will have another shell? not the S2 shell?

Neil

AndyG 21-06-2011 08:37 PM

When Cragg on the Worlds, didn't he only have 5 of the 6 cells wired up? ... To reduce the punch on the loose dirt ... Or am I talking out of my arris?

daz 21-06-2011 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyG (Post 518070)
When Cragg on the Worlds, didn't he only have 5 of the 6 cells wired up? ... To reduce the punch on the loose dirt ... Or am I talking out of my arris?

Not sure about the Worlds, but a few used to do this at the Tiverton national track.

ben 21-06-2011 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyG (Post 518070)
When Cragg on the Worlds, didn't he only have 5 of the 6 cells wired up? ... To reduce the punch on the loose dirt ... Or am I talking out of my arris?

Correct :)

gazhillAE 27-06-2011 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonestar (Post 517247)
it isn't that unfair when you think about it - the reason why these 5 or 6 guys get to run such prototypes when us mere mortals don't is that they've proven countless times that they're above the rest to start with... so, B4.1 or C4.1 they'd still whoop your rear anyway ;)

Now I'd rather have them test it fully before releasing it to the public anyway than push a lemon on the market (DNX408 anyone?)

Paul

Cat sx2 anyone! :thumbdown:

westie 11-07-2011 10:12 PM

Any news on when this is out?
Have put my name down :thumbsup:

styleone 11-07-2011 11:10 PM

centro
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by westie (Post 525814)
Any news on when this is out?
Have put my name down :thumbsup:

I pre-ordered mine today with Mark at MKRacing :thumbsup:...I hear that they will drop at the end of August...its like a big cocktail of S2 and newschool ali chassis madness that is waiting to burst!! :drool: Can't wait!

Richard Lowe 12-07-2011 10:12 AM

It's going to be well worth the wait!

I've got nothing but good things to say about the car after Oswestry, I managed my best ever 2wd national result with essentially zero running before the meeting, roll on Southport :drool:

Crash 12-07-2011 04:47 PM

Trying not to sound a complete donkey here but what's going to be included in the C4.1 kit?
Chassis
Gearbox
Rear bulkhead and shock tower

Anything else??

mark christopher 12-07-2011 06:03 PM

id say a body too and poss the extra idler gear, in fact knowing cml, everything bar the b4/4.1

neiloliver 12-07-2011 07:45 PM

Pre-Ordered. Cant Wait :) :thumbsup:

You must also get the wing mounts, lipo tray, the battery strap, the brass fixing posts for the front bulkhead... and hopefully some CML C4.1 stickers (CML... if you have not done these then you have about a month to do so please :).

and a very small instruction manual?

oh, and very narrow velcro?

styleone 14-07-2011 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neiloliver (Post 526186)
Pre-Ordered. Cant Wait :) :thumbsup:

You must also get the wing mounts, lipo tray, the battery strap, the brass fixing posts for the front bulkhead... and hopefully some CML C4.1 stickers (CML... if you have not done these then you have about a month to do so please :).

and a very small instruction manual?

oh, and very narrow velcro?


....oh and some window masks that have window surrounds already cut in them ;)..oh...and the last thing but by no means the least....oh!..no thats the lot thanks :thumbsup:

RobW 26-07-2011 10:27 AM

Anyone in the know about a latest release date or are we still looking end of August?

Starting to build up bits of a B4.1 already so I can get it to the track that little bit quicker!! So sad.

Rob

millzy 26-07-2011 04:59 PM

Still End of August I have been told by the CML rep

styleone 01-08-2011 11:12 PM

not long left guys
 
Well, first of August and only about 28 days to wait if what people are hearing is correct. I hope that CML do the right thing and release a full box content/tech spec before the release for all who have pre-ordered ...keep those fingers crossed guys cuz if the rumor mill is correct...only 28 sleeps to go ;)

Not that we are fiending or anything you must understand :blush:

RobW 02-08-2011 08:31 AM

I reckon it's going to be a race between the C4.1 and the new Durango to get released first.

Be fun if they get released at the same time - we can all turn up at our tracks the first weekend and try and work out if we've bought the right car:D

Rob

styleone 07-08-2011 12:27 AM

race for release
 
As much as I am dying for a good look at both (I have pre-ordered my C4.1 :thumbsup:) I think the rango will drop first purely due to the fact that they have been developing it for a real long time and they must be very near full production quota. CML will know that the longer they hold out for final 'ironing out' the closer Cragg may get to taking the 2wd Nationals...therefore the bigger the demand as far as the consumers desire for the C4.1. I also feel that due to the fact that the C4.1 is a collaborative project between several parties, that the final stages of design and production will take a little longer than a department in a solo company.

Either way...can not wait to see them both...but C4.1 is going to be epic I feel :wub

tyreman 07-08-2011 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by styleone (Post 536772)
As much as I am dying for a good look at both (I have pre-ordered my C4.1 :thumbsup:) I think the rango will drop first purely due to the fact that they have been developing it for a real long time and they must be very near full production quota. CML will know that the longer they hold out for final 'ironing out' the closer Cragg may get to taking the 2wd Nationals...therefore the bigger the demand as far as the consumers desire for the C4.1. I also feel that due to the fact that the C4.1 is a collaborative project between several parties, that the final stages of design and production will take a little longer than a department in a solo company.

Either way...can not wait to see them both...but C4.1 is going to be epic I feel :wub

Neil can't be beaten for the 2wd title, i think Bradders can tie with him though.

Dudders 11-08-2011 04:49 PM

As the B4.1 front end is used on the X6 and Vega, the C4.1 rear will do for me! Just ordered mine :thumbsup:

arransmith27 14-08-2011 08:10 AM

The only 2wd buggies that I have raced have been rear motored.

How much differently will a mid motored car handle here in the UK?

Just looking to gather some info, as i'm keen to give the c4.1 a go (when it finally appears that is :woot:)

styleone 14-08-2011 11:56 PM

mid motor
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arransmith27 (Post 539794)
The only 2wd buggies that I have raced have been rear motored.

How much differently will a mid motored car handle here in the UK?

Just looking to gather some info, as i'm keen to give the c4.1 a go (when it finally appears that is :woot:)


As you may imagine, having the motor mass over or ,in front in most cases, of the rear axles gives us a number of massive benefits. The cars benefit from bags of straight line traction, they carry more speed in the corners and generally sit down and play ball a lot easier on british medium to high grip astro etc. The mid configuration negates the pendulum effect at the cars arse end and pushes all the rotational energy of the rear end across the centre of the chassis, hopefully making the cars go where you point the nose (in most cases anyway lol)

Most mid buggys also benefit from 4 gear transmissions that are set up with a neutral idler gear, this allows for the extra gear required for spinning the gear boxes around inside not to effect the out put gear ratio.

In summary, bags of grip, no crazy sloppy arse end :) and rotational mass in the centre of the chassis. If you havnt driven mid motor then get on it, as you can see by manufacturers moves in the past couple of years, its just streets ahead on high grip british surfaces. Hence a lot of buggys being released with both configurations possible out the kit box.

Let's not forget though that Lee Martin still drives MOA (motor out the arse) and he is not exactly slow :), if you find yourself ever on loose dirt then the old school format is still king (as shown in this years worlds)

The C4.1 is going to be a corker so get your pre order in hy

styleone 14-08-2011 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arransmith27 (Post 539794)
The only 2wd buggies that I have raced have been rear motored.

How much differently will a mid motored car handle here in the UK?

Just looking to gather some info, as i'm keen to give the c4.1 a go (when it finally appears that is :woot:)


Oh yeah, and they look as cool as Jack Frosts shoes lol ;)

Pownabown 15-08-2011 02:44 PM

Ive heard that they maybe releasing the new c4.1 start of next month i believe now

RobW 15-08-2011 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pownabown (Post 540325)
Ive heard that they maybe releasing the new c4.1 start of next month i believe now

Let's hope so. I'm amazed at the lack of info on this. The CML site announced it in March saying more details to follow and since then nothing, zip.

Sure it'll all be worth it and I guess CML think they don't really need to spend any time hyping it up before the launch given the results.

Starting to think the first I'll hear anymore about it is when MK e-mail me to say the kits are in and they want some money!!

Rob

Dave Dodd 15-08-2011 03:15 PM

I have just been in touch with Cml and they say hopefully end of the month/ early September :)

but still no price yet :eh?:

Aran 15-08-2011 03:33 PM

My bet is around £145-£160 :)

MK Racing 15-08-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aran (Post 540349)
My bet is around £145-£160 :)

Think rrp closer to £170 is more realistic ;)

markwilliamson2001 15-08-2011 04:10 PM

£380 for a 2wd buggy? Are we joking???

MK Racing 15-08-2011 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markwilliamson2001 (Post 540372)
£380 for a 2wd buggy? Are we joking???

Yes it is a lot but NO different to a Vega or X-Factory X-6 conversion (before they released a complete car).....and lots of people are running them.

Marc

Martijn 15-08-2011 05:11 PM

Is the C4.1 also good on dirt tracks?

arransmith27 15-08-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by styleone (Post 540107)
As you may imagine, having the motor mass over or ,in front in most cases, of the rear axles gives us a number of massive benefits. The cars benefit from bags of straight line traction, they carry more speed in the corners and generally sit down and play ball a lot easier on british medium to high grip astro etc. The mid configuration negates the pendulum effect at the cars arse end and pushes all the rotational energy of the rear end across the centre of the chassis, hopefully making the cars go where you point the nose (in most cases anyway lol)

Most mid buggys also benefit from 4 gear transmissions that are set up with a neutral idler gear, this allows for the extra gear required for spinning the gear boxes around inside not to effect the out put gear ratio.

In summary, bags of grip, no crazy sloppy arse end :) and rotational mass in the centre of the chassis. If you havnt driven mid motor then get on it, as you can see by manufacturers moves in the past couple of years, its just streets ahead on high grip british surfaces. Hence a lot of buggys being released with both configurations possible out the kit box.

Let's not forget though that Lee Martin still drives MOA (motor out the arse) and he is not exactly slow :), if you find yourself ever on loose dirt then the old school format is still king (as shown in this years worlds)

The C4.1 is going to be a corker so get your pre order in hy

Thanks :thumbsup:

Just need to wait and see when it finally comes out lol

styleone 15-08-2011 06:47 PM

c4.1 price
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcKnight (Post 540407)
Yes it is a lot but NO different to a Vega or X-Factory X-6 conversion (before they released a complete car).....and lots of people are running them.

Marc

I agree Marc, its a close total price to building either vega or x6 squared. As always the conversion will be mainly targeted at existing b4.1 owners, those who want to create a centro but are not associated owners can pick up a cheap 2nd hand roller, in fact if you actually itemise the b4.1 parts needed to do most mid conversions, people could just order the parts and a centro and away you go. The most expensive individual part (full retail price) will prob be the diff.

Either way I think its fair to say that most top flight conversions are around the same price these days if you already own the transplant car then bonus

KRob 16-08-2011 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobW (Post 540334)
Let's hope so. I'm amazed at the lack of info on this. The CML site announced it in March saying more details to follow and since then nothing, zip.

Sure it'll all be worth it and I guess CML think they don't really need to spend any time hyping it up before the launch given the results.

Starting to think the first I'll hear anymore about it is when MK e-mail me to say the kits are in and they want some money!!

Rob

Hi Rob,
We've not confirmed anything with pictures yet as we don't have any of the specific parts finished in production form (yet).

Although I can confirm all the parts are now going through the production process.

All the cars we've run have been subtely different and have changed along the way and there is no point putting anything up about those, other than it is work in progress.
Jimmy has covered the car in some of his race reports though so photos are out there and we've given it an article about every three weeks or so (as it wins another national) so it hasn't been forgotten on the news pages.

Hoping for about 2-3 weeks but obviously that could change.

This is the first time I've seen a project like this being run, and whilst I'm not involved in it directly I am aware of what is going on and it's really opened my eyes with regard to how it's much more time consuming it is then I ever thought it would (or even could) be!!
But trust me - it's worth waiting for.

RobW 16-08-2011 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRob (Post 540760)
Hi Rob,
We've not confirmed anything with pictures yet as we don't have any of the specific parts finished in production form (yet).

Although I can confirm all the parts are now going through the production process.

All the cars we've run have been subtely different and have changed along the way and there is no point putting anything up about those, other than it is work in progress.
Jimmy has covered the car in some of his race reports though so photos are out there and we've given it an article about every three weeks or so (as it wins another national) so it hasn't been forgotten on the news pages.

Hoping for about 2-3 weeks but obviously that could change.

This is the first time I've seen a project like this being run, and whilst I'm not involved in it directly I am aware of what is going on and it's really opened my eyes with regard to how it's much more time consuming it is then I ever thought it would (or even could) be!!
But trust me - it's worth waiting for.


Thanks, Keith, I wasn't really have a go , but you know how you get when you want your new toy, even old gits like me who probably won't go any faster anyway:)

When are you going to get back down to TORCH and show us how to set our C4.1s up then? We could supply the biscuits:thumbsup:

Rob

super__dan 16-08-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRob (Post 540760)
This is the first time I've seen a project like this being run, and whilst I'm not involved in it directly I am aware of what is going on and it's really opened my eyes with regard to how it's much more time consuming it is then I ever thought it would (or even could) be!!

Though this thread is nothing to do with me I can empathise entirely with this, sometimes it's the smallest details, being let down by external companies that really sets you back etc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com