oOple.com Forums

oOple.com Forums (http://www.oople.com/forums/index.php)
-   Team Associated (http://www.oople.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   TEAM ASSOCIATED "B44" (http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4476)

Richard Lowe 23-11-2007 01:08 PM

I still don't know why people have problems with AE shocks?!

On the latest set I built for my new BJ4 they have changed the spacers that you put in the body with the o rings which are thinner, so you don't have to skim a bit of thickness off the middle one like it says to do in Elvo's guide to get them free. The shock tops seem to get harder to thread onto the shock body the first time with each set I build, but if you put a slight angle on the inside of where the thread starts before you put them on for the first time it's no problem, takes all of 5 seconds with some sandpaper.

Bleeding them is easy too, fill to the top of the shock body with the shaft fully out, screw the top on slightly, push the shaft all the way in and tighten the cap fully, easy :)

c0sie 23-11-2007 01:55 PM

Richard,

What is this 'Elvos Guide' and do you have a link at all?

Thanks

Southwell 23-11-2007 01:58 PM

http://users.pandora.be/elvo

MK999 23-11-2007 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 72478)
Bladders have been around for many years so there's a reason the AE and Tamiya 501X and Losi shocks don't have them - goodness knows what it is tho.
The AE shocks are in desperate need of an update if you ask me - an easier way to install / remove the orings would be my only real wish.

Guessing it's because bladders don't actually eliminate air in the shock they just move it behind a bladder, so the shock isn't 100% filled with oil and under the displacement of the piston this will compress by differing amounts depending how fast the piston moves, probably only a small difference but certainly from an engineering point of view the AE shocks are more 'correct' than others on the market, whether this actually makes a major difference considering they're ridiculously hard to build consistently is debatable though

delanobe 23-11-2007 04:29 PM

Little question.

When building the gearbox of the B44 the manual states not to use any grease in it.

Should I use grease in it??

sosidge 23-11-2007 04:35 PM

Bladder shocks will always have rebound when assembled, it is in the nature of the design.

An emulsion shock like the AE one can be built without any rebound if that is what you prefer in terms of handling. But the downside is that there will always be that tiny squeak of air bubbles.

I think a shock without rebound will generate more grip and perhaps handle the bumps a bit better? Maybe this is why it is the hot setup for offroad?

I assume you could also fit Yokomo bladders and caps onto the AE shocks if you really wanted to, maybe the AE touring bladders would fit too?

I recall fitting bladders onto my old Lazer ZX-5 shocks, although they were a lot easier to build, the car didn't seem quite as settled on the track, but that could have been in my head!

frogger 23-11-2007 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northy (Post 72511)
Follow the link \/ :D

I've tried to buy some mate and it dies as soon as I try to make the Paypal payment :confused: Just gives me an error message.

sly 25-11-2007 06:59 PM

Any concrete dates on the release yet.

losixxx 25-11-2007 07:14 PM

rumor is this friday or monday the 3rd

josh_smaxx 25-11-2007 07:43 PM

Ive never had a problem building AE shocks :confused: and its not like i have much experiance building shocks in genral, mine are always full, bled properly and work well, dont ever have a problem.

c0sie 25-11-2007 11:56 PM

I should have mine next week, late next week hopefully.
I loosely heard that CML think the CML boat will have arrived by then too..fingers crossed!

I saw a B44 (unfinished build) on Friday night and let out some of that 'sex-wee' from that other thread all over it.
I dont think Wes noticed...*evil laugh*

rich_cree 26-11-2007 05:46 AM

http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n...e/CIMG1027.jpg

http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n...e/CIMG1026.jpg

Thanks Tel (of tels shells!)

Chris Doughty 26-11-2007 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rich_cree (Post 73064)

so dialled!

GRIFF55 26-11-2007 09:23 AM

Nice!!!

Richard Lowe 04-12-2007 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rich_cree (Post 73064)

Traitor! :p :p :p

rich_cree 05-12-2007 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Lowe (Post 74867)
Traitor! :p :p :p

Now now, don't be jealous :)

I know I'm jealous that your off to florida and I'm stuck here!!!!

Oliv996 27-12-2007 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy (Post 72478)
Bladders have been around for many years so there's a reason the AE and Tamiya 501X and Losi shocks don't have them - goodness knows what it is tho.
The AE shocks are in desperate need of an update if you ask me - an easier way to install / remove the orings would be my only real wish.

Quote:

Originally Posted by stefke (Post 72508)
although I like the Tamiya shocks very much, I think there can be no discussion : Losi shocks are in many ways the best. PERIOD. Mostly because they are by far the easiest to work on. Changing pistons or fitting internal limiters is sooooo easy. Bleeding is a no-job

AE shocks were good 20 years ago, but they seriously need updating !

The Kyosho shocks on the ZX5 were also easy to work on, but I couldn't prevent them from leaking.

I agree with you Jimmy and Stefke, AE shocks delivered with 1/10 offroad kits, need an update. They are still the same since the begin of 80's !

Quote:

Originally Posted by MK999 (Post 72528)
Guessing it's because bladders don't actually eliminate air in the shock they just move it behind a bladder, so the shock isn't 100% filled with oil and under the displacement of the piston this will compress by differing amounts depending how fast the piston moves, probably only a small difference but certainly from an engineering point of view the AE shocks are more 'correct' than others on the market, whether this actually makes a major difference considering they're ridiculously hard to build consistently is debatable though

So I wonder why AE shocks for RC8 are built with bladders and thoses for RC10Bxx without?

frogger 27-12-2007 12:59 PM

I'm going to guess the shocks have not been updated because they are probably good enough and Associated can save money or focus on other things to make better?

Anyway, could anyone confirm wether these are the Yokomo caps and bladders that fit the Associated shocks please:

#YS-8D Diaphram Shock Cap Set

PodiumRC has them for £7.99 a set

Northy 27-12-2007 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliv996 (Post 80133)
So I wonder why AE shocks for RC8 are built with bladders and thoses for RC10Bxx without?

There is a current mod I have read about to drill a hole in the shock cap on the RC8 to let the air out from behind the bladder, otherwise they don't work well.

I think you'll find they haven't changed due to saving $$$, no other reason.

G

elvo 27-12-2007 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northy (Post 80151)
There is a current mod I have read about to drill a hole in the shock cap on the RC8 to let the air out from behind the bladder, otherwise they don't work well.

I think you'll find they haven't changed due to saving $$$, no other reason.

G

Of course! Bladders don't work if there is a closed chamber of air behind them.

Northy 27-12-2007 01:32 PM

From the master! :cool:

G

MattW 27-12-2007 02:16 PM

It is true that you need escape for air behind the bladder. That said, i really can't think of any good reason why a bladder shock wouldn't work for 10th off rd. Touring car shocks all use bladders, and seemingly 1/8 may do as well.

You can build a bladder shock with no re-bound if you want to - it's easy!! In fact i find bladder shocks easier to "tune" for rebound, so i can't see any reason not to use them!!

Oliv996 27-12-2007 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattW (Post 80163)
It is true that you need escape for air behind the bladder. That said, i really can't think of any good reason why a bladder shock wouldn't work for 10th off rd. Touring car shocks all use bladders, and seemingly 1/8 may do as well.

You can build a bladder shock with no re-bound if you want to - it's easy!! In fact i find bladder shocks easier to "tune" for rebound, so i can't see any reason not to use them!!

Thank you Matthew, that's exactly what I wanted to hear ;)

I mounted VCS2 kit (ASC31120) on my body shocks and as you said, it's really easy to fill and tune the rebound (according the position of the piston in the body when the bladder is mounted). Moreover in the plastic cap, there's a tiny hole to let the air come in and out between bladder and cap. Once assemblied, the shocks are so smoooooth, without any bubble, just oil inside :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com